One of the main challenges in laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) of metal powders is to determine the correlation between the key process parameters and physical properties of the produced components. Additionally, unlike conventional manufacturing processes, LPBF, as one of the many additive manufacturing processes, involves a large number of process parameters hindering the use of conventional factorial design approaches for optimization. In this paper, a modified Plackett-Burman method supported by an experimental analysis is proposed to identify the most significant parameters on the surface roughness quality of the LPBF-made Hastelloy X coupons using an EOS 290 machine. Among more than 100 process parameters, 23 parameters are chosen for this study including laser power and speed for core, skin and contour scans as well as layer thickness, geometry, orientation, location, etc. The surface roughness values (Sq) are measured using a confocal microscope (VK-X250, Keyence, Japan). Then, the roughness measurements are statistically analyzed in Minitab® to determine the most significant process parameters affecting the roughness of the LPBF printed samples. Results of the statistical approach show that the skin thickness, geometry, and layer thickness are the most significant parameters affecting the surface roughness of Hastelloy X components made by the LPBF process.

1.
E.
Herderick
, “
Additive manufacturing of metals: A review
,”
Mater. Sci. Technol. Conf. Exhib. 2011, MS T’11
, vol.
2
, no.
176252
, pp.
1413
1425
,
2011
.
2.
D.
Herzog
,
V.
Seyda
,
E.
Wycisk
, and
C.
Emmelmann
, “
Additive manufacturing of metals
,”
Acta Mater.
, vol.
117
, pp.
371
392
,
2016
.
3.
J.
Schmelzle
,
E. V.
Kline
,
C. J.
Dickman
,
E. W.
Reutzel
,
G.
Jones
, and
T. W.
Simpson
, “
(Re)Designing for Part Consolidation: Understanding the Challenges of Metal Additive Manufacturing
,”
J. Mech. Des.
, vol.
137
, no.
11
, p.
111404
,
2015
.
4.
K. H.
Low
and
K. F.
Leong
, “Review of Selective Laser Melting process parameters for Commercially Pure Titanium and Ti6Al4V,”
Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Adv. Res. Virtual Rapid Prototyp.
,
pp. 71–76
,
2014
.
5.
Haynes International Gas Turbine Alloys
,”
2017
.
6.
W. E.
Frazier
, “
Metal additive manufacturing: A review
,”
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
, vol.
23
, no.
6
. pp.
1917
1928
,
2014
.
7.
F.
Wang
,
X. H.
Wu
, and
D.
Clark
, “
On direct laser deposited Hastelloy X: dimension, surface finish, microstructure and mechanical properties
,”
Mater. Sci. Technol.
, vol.
27
, no.
1
, pp.
344
356
,
2011
.
8.
Y.
Bai
,
Y.
Yang
,
Z.
Xiao
,
M.
Zhang
, and
D.
Wang
, “
Process optimization and mechanical property evolution of AlSiMg0.75 by selective laser melting
,”
Mater. Des.
,
2017
.
9.
N.
Read
,
W.
Wang
,
K.
Essa
, and
M. M.
Attallah
, “
Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: Process optimisation and mechanical properties development
,”
Mater. Des.
, vol.
65
, pp.
417
424
,
2015
.
10.
P. B.
Bacchewar
,
S. K.
Singhal
, and
P. M.
Pandey
, “
Statistical modelling and optimization of surface roughness in the selective laser sintering process
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf.
, vol.
221
, no.
1
, pp.
35
52
,
2007
.
11.
Material data sheet - EOS NickelAlloy HX
,” Munchen,
2015
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.