FIG. 6.1 Dot diameter dependence of principal E_g values for Si ( Al-Douri et al., 2011 ). More about this image found in Dot diameter dependence of principal E_g values ...

FIG. 12.5 Comparison between the true values and the estimates of average fracture width, fracture width at the wellbore, and fracture length ( Siddhamshetty et al., 2018 ). More about this image found in Comparison between the true values and the estimates of average fracture wi...

FIG. 12.12 Comparison of leak-off rates predicted from the DNN and actual values calculated using ( 12.23 ). More about this image found in Comparison of leak-off rates predicted from the DNN and actual values calcu...

FIG. 9.2 Frequency response of a linear generator for (a) different values of the input force (Y₀) and (b) different values of the parasitic damping (ρ_m) which changes the open circuit quality factor. More about this image found in Frequency response of a linear generator for (a) different values of the in...

FIG. 10.3 Model predictive control using the proposed OASIS algorithm. x_e represents the estimated concentration values and x_m represents the measured temperature values. More about this image found in Model predictive control using the proposed OASIS algorithm. x...

FIG. 9.7 Three-day prediction with the resulting full model. The solid trajectories represent actual values, the dashed trajectories are predicted values, and the dotted trajectories are the setpoint. More about this image found in Three-day prediction with the resulting full model. The solid trajectories ...

FIG. 23.1 Estimates of the universal gravitation constant from replicated experiments used in the 2014 determination of reference values ( Mohr et al., 2016 ). More about this image found in Estimates of the universal gravitation constant from replicated experiments...

FIG. 11.8 (a) Comparison of experimental effective mobility values with scattering theory at 77 and 300 K. The dotted line shows the additional mobility required to explain the measured values at 300 K, (b) output characteristics of a β-(Al_0.17Ga_0.83)₂O₃/Ga₂O₃ thin spacer MODFET, and (c) transfer characteristics of the β-(Al_0.17Ga_0.83)₂O₃/Ga₂O₃ thin spacer MODFET measured at V_D = 5 V. Reproduced with permission from Kalarickal et al., J. Appl. Phys. 127 , 215706 (2020). Copyright 2020 AIP Publishing LLC. More about this image found in (a) Comparison of experimental effective mobility values with scattering th...

FIG. 3.4 The CH₄ solubility in [EMIM][Tf₂N] and [EMIM][Tf₂N] + H₂O under different temperatures. Points, experimental values; line, predicted data by UNIFAC-Lei model. Reprinted with permission from Yu et al., Energy Fuels 31 (2), 1429–1439 (2017). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. More about this image found in The CH₄ solubility in [EMIM][Tf₂N] and [EMIM][Tf...

FIG. 3.9 Color-filled IGM maps for different complexes. The isovalue of IGM is 0.01, and the surface sign (λ₂)ρ value is represented according to the color-filled column at the bottom ranging from −0.05 to 0.05 au. Reprinted with permission from Gui et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9 (17), 6033–6047 (2021). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society. More about this image found in Color-filled IGM maps for different complexes. The isovalue of IGM is 0.01,...

FIG. 3.9 Color-filled IGM maps for different complexes. The isovalue of IGM is 0.01, and the surface sign (λ₂)ρ value is represented according to the color-filled column at the bottom ranging from −0.05 to 0.05 au. Reprinted with permission from Gui et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9 (17), 6033–6047 (2021). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society. More about this image found in Color-filled IGM maps for different complexes. The isovalue of IGM is 0.01,...

FIG. 2.3 Results of the path analysis part of SEM models 1–4 show how the relationship between gender and physics identity is mediated through self-efficacy, interest, and perceived recognition (P.R.). (a) In model 1, there are only covariances between each pair of constructs: self-efficacy, P.R., and interest. (b) In model 2, self-efficacy predicts interest and P.R., and interest predicts P.R. (c) In model 3, interest predicts self-efficacy and P.R., and self-efficacy predicts P.R. (d) In model 4, P.R. predicts interest and self-efficacy, and self-efficacy predicts interest. The dashed lines represent residual covariances between constructs. The solid lines represent regression paths, and the numbers on the lines are standardized regression coefficients (β values), which represent the strength of the regression relations. Each regression line thickness qualitatively corresponds to the magnitude of the β value. Regression coefficients with p < 0.050 are indicated by superscript ***, p < 0.010 are indicated by superscript **, and p ≤ 0.001 are indicated by no superscript. For clarity, we have removed the statistically insignificant regression paths from gender to identity or gender to P.R. and self-efficacy in models 2 and 3. More about this image found in Results of the path analysis part of SEM models 1–4 show how the relationsh...

FIG. 5.3 (a) Lattice parameters, a and c, and (b) sublattice spacing, d_IL and d_IS, of PZT and SRO measured from HRTEM image ( Jia et al., 2007 ). The dotted lines indicate the location of the PZT/SRO interface. The open and filled symbols denote the experimental and calculated values, respectively. (c) Schematic illustration of PZT and SRO unit cells with the definition of d_IL and d_IS. Panels (a) and (b) were reproduced with permission from Jia et al., Nat. Mater. 6 , 64–69 (2007). Copyright 2007 Springer Nature. More about this image found in (a) Lattice parameters, a and c, and (b) ...