Search Results for parameter

FIG. 5.5 Flow chart of Parameter identification method. More about this image found in Flow chart of Parameter identification method.

FIG. 16.2 Brandon's matrix category of non-manipulative parameter measurement and examination questions about the electromagnetic spectrum. More about this image found in Brandon's matrix category of non-manipulative parameter measurement and exa...

FIG. 5.21 (a) ADF-STEM images and (b) lattice parameter (c) maps under 0 kV/cm and ±13.8 kV/cm. (c) Relationship between Δa and electric field and (d) relationship between Δc and electric field ( Sato et al., 2020 ). Δa and Δc correspond More about this image found in (a) ADF-STEM images and (b) lattice parameter (c) maps und...

FIG. 9.6 Lattice parameter of the (Tb,Dy)Fe₂ phase in as-cast and heat treated Tb_xDy_1−xFe_1.95 alloys ( Palit et al., 2012 ). More about this image found in Lattice parameter of the (Tb,Dy)Fe₂ phase in as-cast and heat tr...

FIG. 6.41 (a) Equivalent circuit and (b) s-parameter results of the Ohmic SPDT switch. More about this image found in (a) Equivalent circuit and (b) s-parameter results of the Ohmic SPDT switch...

FIG. 5.16 Solar flux distribution simulations using identified parameters at summer solstice solar noon based on the specific aiming strategies: (a) original aiming strategy; (b) improved aiming strategy; and (c) flux density performance. More about this image found in Solar flux distribution simulations using identified parameters at summer s...

FIG. 5.17 Solar flux distribution simulations using identified parameters at equinox 14:00 based on the specific aiming strategies: (a) original aiming strategy; (b) improved aiming strategy; and (c) flux density performance. More about this image found in Solar flux distribution simulations using identified parameters at equinox ...

FIG. 3.13 (a) Substrate and film with lattice parameters a s and a 0 , respectively, where a s < a 0 . (b) Pseudomorphic growth with compressive strain. (c) Misfit dislocation of thin-film growth beyond critical thickness. More about this image found in (a) Substrate and film with lattice parameters a s and a 0...

FIG. 5.3 (a) Lattice parameters, a and c, and (b) sublattice spacing, d_IL and d_IS, of PZT and SRO measured from HRTEM image ( Jia et al., 2007 ). The dotted lines indicate the location of the PZT/SRO interface. The open and filled More about this image found in (a) Lattice parameters, a and c, and (b) ...

FIG. 8.20 Closed-loop state trajectories under P control with K = −3 with a depolarizing error parameter of 0.05 in the simulations labeled “0.05, Noise” a depolarizing error parameter of 0.005 in the simulations labeled “0.005, Noise,” and a depolarizing error parameter of 0.0005 More about this image found in Closed-loop state trajectories under P control with K = −3...

FIG. 8.16 Closed-loop state trajectories under P control with K = −3 with a depolarizing noise parameter of 0.05 in the simulation labeled “Quantum, Noise,” with 1 shot. More about this image found in Closed-loop state trajectories under P control with K = −3...

FIG. 8.17 Closed-loop input trajectories under P control with K = −3 with a depolarizing noise parameter of 0.05 in the simulation labeled “Quantum, Noise,” with 1 shot. More about this image found in Closed-loop input trajectories under P control with K = −3...

FIG. 8.18 Closed-loop state trajectories under P control with K = −2 with a depolarizing noise parameter of 0.05 in the simulation labeled “Quantum, Noise,” with 1 shot. More about this image found in Closed-loop state trajectories under P control with K = −2...

FIG. 5.2 HRTEM image of PZT/SRO interface ( Jia et al., 2007 ) showing the measured lattice parameters in the film and substrate. The thick arrow denotes the interface. d_IL and d_IS are the shift parameters as defined in Fig. 5.3(c) . Reproduced More about this image found in HRTEM image of PZT/SRO interface ( Jia et al., 2007 ) show...

FIG. 5.12 Solar flux distributions produced by a relatively good heliostat. (a) and (b) indicate the actual distribution. (c) and (d) compared the identification results through solar flux distribution simulations using identified and designed parameters. More about this image found in Solar flux distributions produced by a relatively good heliostat. (a) and (...

FIG. 5.13 Solar flux distributions produced by a badly deteriorated heliostat. (a) and (b) indicate the actual distribution. (c) and (d) compared the identification results through solar flux distribution simulations using identified and designed parameters. More about this image found in Solar flux distributions produced by a badly deteriorated heliostat. (a) an...

FIG. 8.19 Closed-loop state trajectories under P control with K = −3 with a depolarizing error parameter of 0.05 in the simulations labeled “1 Shot, Noise” and “10 Shots, Noise.” These two simulations use 1 shot and 10 shots, respectively. More about this image found in Closed-loop state trajectories under P control with K = −3...

FIG. 13.1 Comparison of semiconductor material parameters highlighting Ga₂O₃ main advantages: low conduction and switching losses, high-voltage capability, and high-temperature operation (low leakage). More about this image found in Comparison of semiconductor material parameters highlighting Ga₂...