FIG. 24.1 Scree plot of the first 15 items on the FCI (black line). The red line presents the parallel analysis for 15 items. More about this image found in Scree plot of the first 15 items on the FCI (black line). The red line pres...

FIG. 2.4 System boundary of (a) integrated system (blue dashed line) and (b) methane reforming subsystem (red dashed line). More about this image found in System boundary of (a) integrated system (blue dashed line) and (b) methane...

FIG. 8.7 Line where the mesh independence test was performed. More about this image found in Line where the mesh independence test was performed.

FIG. 9.3 Trajectories of the building space during the training period, where the temperature setpoint trajectory is generated to excite the system dynamics (the setpoint trajectory is denoted by the dashed line). More about this image found in Trajectories of the building space during the training period, where the te...

FIG. 3.4 The CH₄ solubility in [EMIM][Tf₂N] and [EMIM][Tf₂N] + H₂O under different temperatures. Points, experimental values; line, predicted data by UNIFAC-Lei model. Reprinted with permission from Yu et al., Energy Fuels 31 (2), 1429–1439 (2017). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. More about this image found in The CH₄ solubility in [EMIM][Tf₂N] and [EMIM][Tf...

FIG. 2.3 Results of the path analysis part of SEM models 1–4 show how the relationship between gender and physics identity is mediated through self-efficacy, interest, and perceived recognition (P.R.). (a) In model 1, there are only covariances between each pair of constructs: self-efficacy, P.R., and interest. (b) In model 2, self-efficacy predicts interest and P.R., and interest predicts P.R. (c) In model 3, interest predicts self-efficacy and P.R., and self-efficacy predicts P.R. (d) In model 4, P.R. predicts interest and self-efficacy, and self-efficacy predicts interest. The dashed lines represent residual covariances between constructs. The solid lines represent regression paths, and the numbers on the lines are standardized regression coefficients (β values), which represent the strength of the regression relations. Each regression line thickness qualitatively corresponds to the magnitude of the β value. Regression coefficients with p < 0.050 are indicated by superscript ***, p < 0.010 are indicated by superscript **, and p ≤ 0.001 are indicated by no superscript. For clarity, we have removed the statistically insignificant regression paths from gender to identity or gender to P.R. and self-efficacy in models 2 and 3. More about this image found in Results of the path analysis part of SEM models 1–4 show how the relationsh...

FIG. 8.4 ECDF vs TCDF derived from the KS test. The black line indicates the ECDF directly evaluated from the simulations, while the blue line indicates the theoretical CDF fitted as a Poisson process. More about this image found in ECDF vs TCDF derived from the KS test. The black line indicates the ECDF di...

FIG. 5.10 Diffraction peaks of (200) and (020) before and after strain annealing [(a)–(c)] the relationship between T_c and lattice constants at room temperature (d). The inset shows T_c vs orthorhombicity a/b; the solid line is the result of fitting by a function of (a/b)² ( Awaji et al., 2015 ). More about this image found in Diffraction peaks of (200) and (020) before and after strain annealing [(a)...

FIG. 3.6 Solubility of CH₄ in seven pure ILs at a temperature of 273.15 K. Lines, results predicted by the Mod. UNIFAC-Lei model; scattered points, experimental data. (red up triangle) [EMIM][BF₄]; (black square box) [BMIM][PF₆]; (green down triangle) [BMIM][BF₄]; (blue circle) [OMIM][PF₆]; (magenta star) [BMIM][Tf₂N]; (blue diamond) [OMIM][BF₄]; (white square box) [OMIM][Tf₂N]. Reprinted with permission from Yu et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57 (20), 7064–7076 (2018b). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. More about this image found in Solubility of CH₄ in seven pure ILs at a temperature of 273.15 K...

FIG. 3.5 Solubility of CH₄ in pure [BMIM][PF₆] (a), [OMIM][PF₆] (b), [EMIM][BF₄] (c), [BMIM][BF₄] (d), [OMIM][BF₄] (e), [BMIM][Tf₂N] (f), and [OMIM][Tf₂N] (g) at different temperatures. Lines, results predicted by the Mod. UNIFAC-Lei model; scattered points, experimental data. (black square box) 353.15 K; (red circle) 333.15 K; (green up triangle) 313.15 K; (blue down triangle) 293.15 K; (rose square box) 273.15 K; (blue circle) 258.15 K; (purple triangle) 243.15 K. Reprinted with permission from Yu et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57 (20), 7064–7076 (2018b). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. More about this image found in Solubility of CH₄ in pure [BMIM][PF₆] (a), [OMIM][PF...

FIG. 3.5 Solubility of CH₄ in pure [BMIM][PF₆] (a), [OMIM][PF₆] (b), [EMIM][BF₄] (c), [BMIM][BF₄] (d), [OMIM][BF₄] (e), [BMIM][Tf₂N] (f), and [OMIM][Tf₂N] (g) at different temperatures. Lines, results predicted by the Mod. UNIFAC-Lei model; scattered points, experimental data. (black square box) 353.15 K; (red circle) 333.15 K; (green up triangle) 313.15 K; (blue down triangle) 293.15 K; (rose square box) 273.15 K; (blue circle) 258.15 K; (purple triangle) 243.15 K. Reprinted with permission from Yu et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57 (20), 7064–7076 (2018b). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. More about this image found in Solubility of CH₄ in pure [BMIM][PF₆] (a), [OMIM][PF...