A systematic study of low temperature (LT) annealing III1-xMnxV of (Ga1-xMnxAs and Ga1-xMnxAs1-yPy) thin films in situ with different capping layers (Se, Te, or As) was carried out without exposure to the atmosphere. Experimental results show that a correct in situ annealing approach can lead to significant increases of the Curie temperature, carrier concentration, and magnetic moment, similar to the ex situ LT-annealing experiments achieved in earlier studies. Moreover, this approach allowed us to successfully deposit high-quality semiconductor layers on top of such in situ annealed films, demonstrating great potential for designing high quality III1-xMnxV-based multilayers for spintronic applications optimized by the benefits of the LT-annealing.

Considerable effort has been devoted to the study of III1-xMnxV magnetic semiconductors due to their potential for applications in spintronic devices.1,2 It is already well established that the ferromagnetic interaction between magnetic ions in these materials is mediated by holes, and that point defects such as Mn interstitials (MnI) play a crucial role in determining the magnetic properties of the III1-xMnxV alloys.3 Earlier experimental studies have shown that the Curie temperature of Ga1-xMnxAs epilayers can be further increased by postgrowth heat treatment, i.e., by low-temperature (LT) annealing.4,5 Specifically, channeling Rutherford backscattering and channeling particle-induced x-ray emission experiments revealed that LT-annealing leads to out-diffusion of the highly mobile MnI defects from the specimen bulk, accumulating at the free surface of the film.6 Such removal of MnI from the bulk then leads to increases of the Curie temperature TC, of the carrier concentration p, and of the average magnetic moment of the Mn content through.6,7 Annealing experiments on Ga1-xMnxAs epilayers were typically carried out ex situ, in air or in nitrogen gas, or in situ under As or Sb capping, at different annealing temperatures and for different annealing times.4,5,8–10 This approach typically involves surfaces terminated with an oxide or with MnAs(Sb) clusters, which automatically inhibits further overgrowth on top of the annealed Ga1-xMnxAs film.11,12

In this work, we carried out a systematic study of annealing III1-xMnxV films (Ga1-xMnxAs and Ga1-xMnxAs1-yPy) in situ, i.e., without removal from the molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) chamber, with different capping layers (e.g., As, Se, or Te). Our results show that a correct in situ LT-annealing approach can lead to increases of TC, p, and the magnetic moment, as in the earlier optimized ex situ annealing experiments. Importantly, however, this approach also allows deposition of high-quality semiconductor layers directly on top of such in situ annealed films, demonstrating great potential for designing high quality III1-xMnxV-based multilayers for spintronic applications, that take advantage of the benefits of the annealing process.

In order to systematically investigate the effects of in situ annealing on structural and magnetic properties in III1-xMnxV films, we grew by MBE two series of samples on GaAs (100) substrates: 12 nm thick Ga1-xMnxAs films and 10–50 nm thick Ga1-xMnxAs1-yPy films,13 with Mn concentrations ranging between 4 and 8%, and P concentrations of about 15%. High-purity Ga and Mn elemental fluxes were provided by standard effusion cells, and As2 and P2 fluxes were generated by cracker cells. The growth was monitored by in situ reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED), which shows that the RHEED of GaMnAs or GaMnAsP epilayers is of the (1 × 2) type, and LT-AlGaAs shows (1 × 1) pattern (no reconstruction), indicating that the grown films are monocrystalline.14 Epi-ready GaAs semi-insulating (100) substrates from AXT, Inc., are used in this study. The background residual pressure in the MBE chamber is below 1 × 10−9 Torr. The substrate temperature is measured by a thermocouple which was carefully calibrated at the melting points of indium and at the temperature of oxide desorption from the GaAs surface. After being placed in the preparation chamber, the GaAs substrates were cleaned in situ by oxide desorption, by heating to 600 °C. The completion of the cleaning process was recognized by monitoring the RHEED pattern. The procedure for MBE growth of the GaMnAs or GaMnAsP was as follows. First a GaAs buffer of thickness 100–200 nm was grown at high temperature, TS ∼ 600 °C (i.e., under normal GaAs growth conditions). Then the substrate was immediately cooled down to a temperature of 250 °C for LT growth. Using As2:Ga beam equivalent pressure ratio of 20:1, the GaMnAs or GaMnAsP layers were then grown at this lower temperature. After growth, the films were cooled to room temperature, and the in situ annealing procedure was carried out as follows. An amorphous capping layer of As, Se, or Te was first deposited in MBE vacuum chamber to thickness of a few tenths of a nanometer. The substrate temperature of the film was then gradually increased to 200 °C and then to 300 °C in a two-step annealing process, with 15 min per step, without removal from the MBE chamber. During annealing, RHEED showed the recovery of a (1 × 2) streaky RHEED pattern of the III1-xMnxV films after desorption of amorphous capping layer. For comparison, a sample without a capping layer was also annealed by the same procedure, which we will refer to as “vacuum-annealed.” Additionally, we grew a III1-xMnxV sample with a AlGaAs capping layer on such in situ annealed III1-xMnxV film. Such overgrowth by high-quality semiconductor layers on top of in situ annealed films demonstrates great potential for designing high quality III1-xMnxV-based multilayers for spintronic applications, which take advantage of the benefits of LT annealing of the constituent ferromagnetic layers.

Magnetization measurements on the III1-xMnxV films obtained by this process were carried out as a function of magnetic field and temperature using a Quantum Design superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer. X-ray diffraction (ω-2θ) measurements were also performed to calculate the corresponding out-of-plane lattice constants. Resistivity was measured as a function of temperature in order to examine the effects of annealing on the hole concentration. Finally, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out on the in situ Se-annealed GaMnAs/AlGaAs heterostructure. After the spectrum was measured, the surface was bombarded in situ by Ar+ ions accelerated to 1.4 keV for 10 min at 5 × 10−6 mbar. The relevant high resolution core line spectra of the bombarded surface, e.g., Al 2p level, Mn 2p3/2 level, and Se 3d level, were repeatedly collected seven times to probe the compositional profile of the specimen.

In Table I, we list the structural parameters of the GaMnAs films obtained under various annealing processes. Note that sample A* and E* are parts from samples A and E, respectively. All samples were investigated by SQUID magnetometry. The magnetic parameters, such as the Curie temperature TC and saturation magnetization Ms are also obtained by SQUID measurements, are also listed in Table I. Hysteresis loops at T = 5 K along the [100] crystallographic direction for samples A, A*, B, and C are shown in the top panels of Fig. 1. The hysteresis loops of samples D and E (not shown) are similar to that of sample A except for their magnitude; the hysteresis loop for sample E* (not shown) is similar to that of sample A*. The corresponding temperature dependences of magnetization measured in a 10 Oe field applied along the [100] direction is shown in the bottom panels of Fig. 1. Note that all annealed samples have a higher Curie temperature and a higher magnetization, clearly indicating that the overall quality of the ferromagnetic order is enhanced by the in situ LT-annealing process. Note also that the LT-annealing in vacuum without the amorphous capping layer does not have such dramatic effect, indicating that the amorphous Se capping layer plays an important role in the annealing process. Moreover, it should be pointed out that we have achieved a high Curie temperature (TC ∼ 133 K) in a 12 nm GaMnAs/12 nm AlGaAs heterostructure (sample B). Interestingly, hysteresis loop of the latter sample appears to be modified by AlGaAs overgrowth compared with that of sample C, which remains to be investigated. To further investigate the electrical properties of in situ-annealed GaMnAs samples, electrical transport measurements were performed on both as-grown and annealed specimens. During the measurements, the specimen was loaded into a Janis closed-cycle helium flow cryostat with a temperature range between 12 and 270 K. Temperature-dependent sheet resistivity for GaMnAs samples (B, C, D, and E) are shown in Fig. 2. The resistivity data for sample A (not shown) are similar to those of sample D.

Table I.

Structural and magnetic parameters of 12 nm GaMnAs films after various annealing conditions.

Sample No.Sample structureIn situ annealingEx situ annealingTC (K)Ms (emu/cm3)
Ga0.94Mn0.06As   51.4 13 
A* Ga0.94Mn0.06As  LT-annealed at 260 °C in N2 99.4 19 
Ga0.94Mn0.06As Se-annealing  129.3 44 
Ga0.94Mn0.06As/Ga0.85Al0.15As Se-annealing  133.3 72 
Ga0.92Mn0.08As   72.4 39 
Ga0.92Mn0.08As Vacuum-annealing  78.4 51 
E* Ga0.92Mn0.08As Vacuum-annealing LT-annealed at 260 °C in N2 99.3 56 
Sample No.Sample structureIn situ annealingEx situ annealingTC (K)Ms (emu/cm3)
Ga0.94Mn0.06As   51.4 13 
A* Ga0.94Mn0.06As  LT-annealed at 260 °C in N2 99.4 19 
Ga0.94Mn0.06As Se-annealing  129.3 44 
Ga0.94Mn0.06As/Ga0.85Al0.15As Se-annealing  133.3 72 
Ga0.92Mn0.08As   72.4 39 
Ga0.92Mn0.08As Vacuum-annealing  78.4 51 
E* Ga0.92Mn0.08As Vacuum-annealing LT-annealed at 260 °C in N2 99.3 56 
Fig. 1.

[(a)–(d)] Hysteresis loops measured at 5 K with magnetic field applied along the [100] direction measured on the control sample (as-grown 12 nm GaMnAs, sample A); ex situ annealed control sample (sample A*); in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs (sample B), and in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs/12 nm AlGaAs heterostructure (sample C). [(e)–(h)] Corresponding magnetization results as a function of temperature measured in a magnetic field of 10 Oe applied along the [100] direction.

Fig. 1.

[(a)–(d)] Hysteresis loops measured at 5 K with magnetic field applied along the [100] direction measured on the control sample (as-grown 12 nm GaMnAs, sample A); ex situ annealed control sample (sample A*); in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs (sample B), and in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs/12 nm AlGaAs heterostructure (sample C). [(e)–(h)] Corresponding magnetization results as a function of temperature measured in a magnetic field of 10 Oe applied along the [100] direction.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

(Color online) Temperature-dependent sheet resistivity ρxx under zero magnetic field for as-grown 12 nm GaMnAs (sample D), vacuum-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs (sample E), in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs (sample B), and in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs/12 nm AlGaAs heterostructure (sample C).

Fig. 2.

(Color online) Temperature-dependent sheet resistivity ρxx under zero magnetic field for as-grown 12 nm GaMnAs (sample D), vacuum-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs (sample E), in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs (sample B), and in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs/12 nm AlGaAs heterostructure (sample C).

Close modal

All of the samples show a clear resistivity maximum point Tρ, which can be regarded as an estimate of TC (usually slightly higher than TC).15 Curie temperatures obtained from the ρ-T curves are in good agreement with those measured by SQUID. In addition to the enhancement of TC, in situ Se-annealing leads to lower sheet resistivities because of the removal of MnI from the sample bulk. Note that after Se-annealing, ρ at low temperature becomes smaller than ρ at room temperature, indicating that the material has undergone a transition from a semiconductorlike type to a metallic type.

The above results indicate that in situ LT-annealing (i.e., without removal from the MBE chamber) with amorphous Se capping layers leads to an increase of TC, of magnetic moment, and of p (the latter resulting in a semiconductor-to-metallic transition), similar to findings in earlier optimized ex situ annealing experiments. It is widely accepted that such LT-annealing leads to the removal of Mn atoms from interstitial positions MnI. It is also well known that the interstitial MnI ions are positively charged double donors and are thus attracted to the negatively charged substitutional Mn acceptors MnGa to form MnGa–MnI pairs. Theoretical calculations16 showed that the MnI atoms do not contribute to the ferromagnetic coupling mediated by free holes and, furthermore, that the MnGa–MnI pairs are coupled antiferromagnetically through superexchange interaction, so that they do not contribute magnetization. As a result, the increase of the hole concentration p (measured by the electric transport), as well as the increase in saturation magnetization and the increase of the Curie temperature observed on annealed samples all serve to corroborate that in situ Se-annealing results in the removal of a significant fraction of Mn interstitials in GaMnAs.17 

Figure 3 shows changes in the XPS spectra arising from the Ar-ion etching of the surface of in situ Se-annealed GaMnAs/AlGaAs heterostructure. Noticeable intensity changes of the core lines were observed in high-resolution XPS spectra for a sequence of etchings. The arrow in the figure indicates the interface between GaMnAs and AlGaAs. Figure 3 shows the Al 2p, Mn 2p3/2 and Se 3d core level spectra. Al 2p peak centered at 73 eV, whose intensity decreases dramatically after 40 min of Ar-ion etching, corresponding to the appearance of Mn 2p3/2 peak centered at 639 eV. As shown in Fig. 3, a Se 3d core level peak located at 53.8 eV appears only at the interface between GaMnAs and AlGaAs. This indicates the presence of a Se-related compound at the interface, although we have observed the desorption of Se during the LT-annealing process. We speculate that the removal of MnI is assisted by a Se related solid–solid reaction occurring on the surface of GaMnAs, similar to what occurs during ex situ LT-annealing, where the GaMnAs surface is passivated with an oxide.

Fig. 3.

(Color online) XPS spectral changes obtained by Ar-ion etching on the (001) surface of in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs/12 nm AlGaAs heterostructure (sample C). The high-resolution core-line spectra of (a) Al 2p level, (b) Mn 2p3/2 level, and (c) Se 3d level. The etching sequence from bottom to top shows each spectrum after Ar-ion-etching times from 0 min (as-received sample), 10 to 70 min with a 10-min step.

Fig. 3.

(Color online) XPS spectral changes obtained by Ar-ion etching on the (001) surface of in situ Se-annealed 12 nm GaMnAs/12 nm AlGaAs heterostructure (sample C). The high-resolution core-line spectra of (a) Al 2p level, (b) Mn 2p3/2 level, and (c) Se 3d level. The etching sequence from bottom to top shows each spectrum after Ar-ion-etching times from 0 min (as-received sample), 10 to 70 min with a 10-min step.

Close modal

For completeness, we have fabricated a series of GaMnAsP under in situ annealing process with various amorphous capping layer. Table II listed the structural of GaMnAs films under various annealing process. Note that, sample G* is part piece from sample G. All samples are investigated by SQUID magnetometry and XRD. The obtained magnetic parameters such as Curie temperature TC and saturation magnetization Ms are also listed in the table.

Table II.

Structural and magnetic parameters of GaMnAsP films under various annealing process.

Sample No.StructureIn situ annealingEx situ annealingTC (K)Ms (emu/cm3)
50 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15   48.2 30 
G* 50 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15  LT-annealed at 260 °C in N2 60.3 32 
10 nm Ga0.95Mn0.05As0.85P0.15 Se-annealing  99.8 61 
32 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15 Se-annealing  75.3 45 
50 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15 As-annealing  55.3 28 
50 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15 Te-annealing  67.3 40 
Sample No.StructureIn situ annealingEx situ annealingTC (K)Ms (emu/cm3)
50 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15   48.2 30 
G* 50 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15  LT-annealed at 260 °C in N2 60.3 32 
10 nm Ga0.95Mn0.05As0.85P0.15 Se-annealing  99.8 61 
32 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15 Se-annealing  75.3 45 
50 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15 As-annealing  55.3 28 
50 nm Ga0.96Mn0.04As0.85P0.15 Te-annealing  67.3 40 

Hysteresis loops at T = 5 K along the [001] axis for samples G, I, J, and K are shown in the top panels of Fig. 4. The corresponding temperature dependence of magnetization measured in a 10 Oe field applied along the [001] direction is shown in the bottoms panels of Fig. 4. Note that all annealed samples has the higher Curie temperature and much square hysteresis loops, indicating that the overall quality of ferromagnetic order is enhanced by LT-annealing process with As, Se, and Te amorphous capping layer, indicating that the amorphous capping layer plays an important role in annealing process. The 2θ-ω coupled XRD scans (not shown) were also carried out on every sample. Without significant changes to the intensity of peaks, it is noted that the diffraction spectrum from the LT-annealed epilayers is shifted to the right by about 0.21° compared with that measured for the as-grown sample, from 66.36° to 66.57° for 2θ at the (004) reflection. This indicates that the value of the out-of-plane lattice constant is reduced from 5.630 to 5.614 Å, thus suggesting the elimination of interstitial Mn atoms in GaMnAsP samples by the annealing process.

Fig. 4.

[(a)–(d)] Hysteresis loops measured at 5 K with magnetic field applied along [001] measured on the control sample (as-grown 50 nm GaMnAsP, sample G), in situ Te-annealed 50 nm GaMnAsP film (sample K), in situ As-annealed 50 nm GaMnAsP film (sample J), and in situ Se-annealed 50 nm GaMnAsP film (sample I). [(e)–(h)] Corresponding magnetization as a function of temperature measured in 10 Oe magnetic field applied along [001].

Fig. 4.

[(a)–(d)] Hysteresis loops measured at 5 K with magnetic field applied along [001] measured on the control sample (as-grown 50 nm GaMnAsP, sample G), in situ Te-annealed 50 nm GaMnAsP film (sample K), in situ As-annealed 50 nm GaMnAsP film (sample J), and in situ Se-annealed 50 nm GaMnAsP film (sample I). [(e)–(h)] Corresponding magnetization as a function of temperature measured in 10 Oe magnetic field applied along [001].

Close modal

The in situ annealing effect on magnetic properties of ternary alloy Ga1-xMnxAs and quaternary alloy Ga1-xMnxAs1-yPy on GaAs (100) substrate is explored. We discovered that the in situ annealing has the similar effect on III-Mn-V as the ex situ annealing, provided that an amorphous cap layer of As, Se, or Te is deposited at room temperature first before the low-temperature annealing. XPS spectra analysis suggests that the effect of low temperature annealing on III1-xMnxV might be due to the diffusion out of “high mobility” Mn interstitials MnI which is driven by the solid–solid reaction between Mn ions and the elements (As, Se, or Te; O in ex situ case) on surface below 300 °C. Importantly, in situ Se annealing enables us to fabricate the heterostructures (e.g., modulation doping heterostructure) with the embedded high quality GaMnAs layers.

This work was supported by the NSF Grant No. DMR14-00432, Basic Science Research Program through the NRF of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2015R1D1A1A01056614), and a grant from Korea University. P.S. and S.P. acknowledge the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under the Award No. DE-FC02-04ER15533 (No. NDRL No. 5200).

1.
T.
Dietl
,
H.
Ohno
,
F.
Matsukura
,
J.
Cibert
, and
D.
Ferrand
,
Science
287
,
1019
(
2000
).
3.
T.
Jungwirth
,
J.
Sinova
,
J.
Mašek
,
J.
Kučera
, and
A. H.
MacDonald
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
78
,
809
(
2006
).
4.
T.
Hayashi
,
Y.
Hashimoto
,
S.
Katsumoto
, and
Y.
Iye
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
78
,
1691
(
2001
).
5.
S. J.
Potashnik
,
K. C.
Ku
,
S. H.
Chun
,
J. J.
Berry
,
N.
Samarth
, and
P.
Schiffer
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
79
,
1495
(
2001
).
6.
K. M.
Yu
,
W.
Walukiewicz
,
T.
Wojtowicz
,
I.
Kuryliszyn
,
X.
Liu
,
Y.
Sasaki
, and
J. K.
Furdyna
,
Phys. Rev. B
65
,
201303(R)
(
2002
).
7.
I.
Kuryliszyn
 et al.,
Acta Phys. Pol., A
102
,
659
(
2002
).
8.
B. S.
Sørensen
,
P. E.
Lindelof
,
J.
Sadowski
,
R.
Mathieu
, and
P.
Svedlindh
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
82
,
2287
(
2003
).
9.
M.
Adell
 et al.,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
86
,
112501
(
2005
).
10.
O.
Yastrubchak
,
T.
Wosinski
,
L.
Gluba
,
T.
Andrearczyk
,
J. Z.
Domagala
,
J.
Żuk
, and
J.
Sadowski
,
J. Appl. Phys.
115
,
012009
(
2014
).
11.
D.
Chiba
,
K.
Takamura
,
F.
Matsukura
, and
H.
Ohno
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
82
,
3020
(
2003
).
12.
J.
Adell
,
I.
Ulfat
,
L.
Ilver
,
J.
Sadowski
,
K.
Karlsson
, and
J.
Kanski
,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
23
,
085003
(
2011
).
13.
H.
Lee
 et al.,
AIP Adv.
7
,
055809
(
2017
).
14.
H. K.
Choi
,
J. S.
Lee
,
S. W.
Cho
,
W. O.
Lee
,
S. B.
Shim
, and
Y. D.
Park
,
J. Appl. Phys.
101
,
063906
(
2007
).
15.
S.
Yuldashev
,
H.
Im
,
V.
Yalishev
,
C.
Park
,
T.
Kang
,
S.
Lee
,
Y.
Sasaki
,
X.
Liu
, and
J.
Furdyna
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
82
,
1206
(
2003
).
16.
J.
Blinowski
and
P.
Kacman
,
Phys. Rev. B
67
,
121204(R)
(
2003
).
17.
I.
Kuryliszyn-Kudelska
,
J. Z.
Domagała
,
T.
Wojtowicz
,
X.
Liu
,
E.
Łusakowska
,
W.
Dobrowolski
, and
J. K.
Furdyna
,
J. Appl. Phys.
95
,
603
(
2004
).