A comparison of the performance of high resolution lithographic tools is presented here. The authors use extreme ultraviolet interference lithography, electron beam lithography, and He ion beam lithography tools on two different resists that are processed under the same conditions. The dose-to-clear and the lithographic contrast are determined experimentally and are used to compare the relative efficiency of each tool. The results are compared to previous studies and interpreted in the light of each tool-specific secondary electron yield. In addition, the patterning performance is studied by exposing dense lines/spaces patterns, and the relation between critical dimension and exposure dose is discussed. Finally, the lumped parameter model is employed in order to quantitatively estimate the critical dimension of lines/spaces, using each tool specific aerial image. Our implementation is then validated by fitting the model to the experimental data from interference lithography exposures and extracting the resist contrast.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2016
Research Article|
November 03 2016
Comparative study of resists and lithographic tools using the Lumped Parameter Model
Roberto Fallica;
Roberto Fallica
a)
Paul Scherrer Institut
, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert Kirchner;
Robert Kirchner
Paul Scherrer Institut
, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Yasin Ekinci;
Yasin Ekinci
Paul Scherrer Institut
, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Dominique Mailly
Dominique Mailly
Laboratoire de photonique et de nanostructures
, CNRS, Route de Nozay, 91460 Marcoussis, France
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: roberto.fallica@psi.ch
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 34, 06K702 (2016)
Article history
Received:
August 04 2016
Accepted:
October 24 2016
Citation
Roberto Fallica, Robert Kirchner, Yasin Ekinci, Dominique Mailly; Comparative study of resists and lithographic tools using the Lumped Parameter Model. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1 November 2016; 34 (6): 06K702. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4967183
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Future of plasma etching for microelectronics: Challenges and opportunities
Gottlieb S. Oehrlein, Stephan M. Brandstadter, et al.
Novel low-temperature and high-flux hydrogen plasma source for extreme-ultraviolet lithography applications
A. S. Stodolna, T. W. Mechielsen, et al.
Vertical silicon nanowedge formation by repetitive dry and wet anisotropic etching combined with 3D self-aligned sidewall nanopatterning
Yasser Pordeli, Céline Steenge, et al.
Related Content
Lithographic performance of ZEP520A and mr-PosEBR resists exposed by electron beam and extreme ultraviolet lithography
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B (November 2017)
Combined helium ion beam and nanoimprint lithography attains 4 nm half-pitch dense patterns
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B (October 2012)
Apparatus for combined nanoscale gravimetric, stress, and thermal measurements
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (August 2018)
Lithographic performance evaluation of a contaminated extreme ultraviolet mask after cleaning
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B (July 2010)
Lithographic characterization of the flare in the Berkeley 0.3 numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet microfield optic
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B (April 2006)