We show the first results from a newly-operation advanced x-ray stepper, and describe an improved type of x-ray mask for use on it. The Mod 5C is the newest x-ray stepper developed by JMAR (JSAL Nanolithography). It is configured for installation at the Center for NanoTechnology (CNTech) on a synchrotron radiation port of the Aladdin storage ring. The alignment system is based on a new IBBI detection system with demonstrated subnanometer resolution. For this system, three microscopes are used for detecting the misalignment between wafer and mask marks with the error signal fed back in the mask positioning stage with the mask locked to the wafer stage through the use of a high-resolution laser interferometer. Both field-by-field and global alignment techniques are possible, and multiple wafer sizes can be used with a NIST format mask held in a kinematic mount, with a gap setting capable of adjustment between 2 and 50microns. A novel beam scanning system was installed to deliver a uniform exposure over a field of 35×35mm2 field. The high power from the storage ring allows exposure times in chemically amplified resists of 510s for the CNTech-designed beamline; shorter exposure times could be achieved with a refocusing beamline, and the stepper can be configured for an x-ray point source. To achieve sub-35nm resolution requires very small gaps. A new type of mask had to be developed, on the basis of the mesa mask originally developed at MIT. A very high flatness is required to maintain a parallel mask-wafer exposure environment. Currently, for low cost and easy manufacturing, we employ gold-plated absorber masks with a silicon nitride membrane. From the initial exposures, the resolution achieved is below 50nm with exposure conditions described. The issues of the resolution of the exposure tool are addressed and compared to the outcomes from detailed modeling.

1.
F.
Cerrina
,
J. Phys. D
3
,
21
(
2000
).
2.
F.
Cerrina
,
Synchrotron Radiat. News
(
1996
).
3.
O. A.
Makarov
,
Z.
Chen
,
A. A.
Krasnoperova
,
F.
Cerrina
,
V. V.
Cherkashin
,
A. G.
Poleshchuk
, and
V. P.
Koronkevich
,
Proc. SPIE
2723
,
261
(
1996
).
4.
M.
Khan
,
F.
Cerrina
, and
J.
Maldonado
,
Proc. SPIE
(
1996
).
5.
Franco
Cerrina
,
Mumit
Khan
,
Geng
Han
, and
Srinivas B.
Bollepalli
,
XRL Conference Proceedings
,
1999
.
6.
O.
Vladimirsky
,
N.
Dandekar
,
W.
Jiang
,
Q.
Leonard
,
K.
Simon
,
S.
Bollepalli
,
Y.
Vladimirsky
, and
J. W.
Taylor
,
Proc. SPIE
3776
(
1999
).
7.
G. M.
Wells
,
E. L.
Brodsky
,
M.
Reilly
,
P. D.
Anderson
,
J. W.
Taylor
, and
F.
Cerrina
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A
347
,
466
(
1994
).
8.
D.
Hamilton
,
G.
Sullivan
, and
D.
Huston
,
SPIE 3674-34 Proceedings of the SPIE Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies Conference
,
Newport Beach
, CA, March
1999
.
9.
D. R.
Huston
and
X.
Zhao
, Control of Stages-Final Report, for JMAR/SAL, Inc., 30 July
2003
.
10.
Advances in CPL, Collimated Plasma Source and Full Field Exposure for Sub-100 nm Lithography
, SPIE
2003
,
Brent
Boerger
, JMAR/SAL Nanolithography, VT;
Scott
Mcleod
, JMAR/SAL Nanolithography, VT;
Richard
Forber
, JMAR Research, CA;
Edmond
Turcu
, JMAR Research, CA;
Cel
Gaeta
, JMAR Research, CA;
Donald K.
Bailey
, JMAR/SAL Nanolithography VT;
Jacob
Ben-Jacob
, JMAR/SAL Nanolithography VT.
11.
E. E.
Moon
,
L.
Chen
,
P.
Everett
,
M.
Mondol
, and
Henry I.
Smith
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
22
,
3378
(
2004
).
12.
Gerald A.
Dicks
,
Roxann L.
Engelstad
,
Edward G.
Lovell
,
Brent E.
Boerger
,
Daniel J.
Fleming
, and
Karen H.
Brown
,
Predicting Image Placement Accuracy of X-ray Masks
.
13.
S. H.
Bloom
,
H.
Rieger
, and
J.
Alwan
, JMAR Research Division,
X-Ray Nanoplasma Instruments and Tools
.
You do not currently have access to this content.