Atmospheric-pressure plasma-enhanced spatial atomic layer deposition (PE-s-ALD) is considered a promising technique for high-throughput and low-temperature deposition of ultrathin films for applications where volume and costs are particularly relevant. The number of atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD processes developed so far is rather limited, and the fundamental aspects of their growth mechanisms are largely unexplored. This work presents a study of the atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD process of Al2O3 using trimethylaluminum [TMA, Al(CH3)3] and Ar–O2 plasma within the temperature range of 80–200 °C. Thin-film analysis revealed low impurity contents and a decreasing growth-per-cycle (GPC) with increasing temperature. The underlying chemistry of the process was studied with a combination of gas-phase infrared spectroscopy on the exhaust plasma gas and optical emission spectroscopy (OES) on the plasma zone. Among the chemical species formed in the plasma half-cycle, CO2, H2O, CH4, and CH2O were identified. The formation of these products confirms that the removal of CH3 ligands during the plasma half-cycle occurs through two reaction pathways that have a different temperature dependences: (i) combustion reactions initiated by O2 plasma species and leading to CO2 and H2O formation and (ii) thermal ALD-like reactions initiated by the H2O molecules formed in pathway (i) and resulting in CH4 production. With increasing temperature, the dehydroxylation of OH groups cause less TMA adsorption which leads to less CO2 and H2O from the combustion reactions in the plasma step. At the same time, the higher reactivity of H2O at higher temperatures initiates more thermal ALD-like reactions, thus producing relatively more CH4. The CH4 can also undergo further gas-phase reactions leading to the formation of CH2O as was theoretically predicted. Another observation is that O3, which is naturally produced in the atmospheric-pressure O2 plasma, decomposes at higher temperatures mainly due to an increase of gas-phase collisions. In addition to the new insights into the growth mechanism of atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD of Al2O3, this work presents a method to study both the surface chemistry during spatial ALD to further extend our fundamental understanding of the method.

Spatial Atomic Layer Deposition (s-ALD) is a high-throughput, chemical vapor deposition-like technique where a substrate is typically transported through a sequence of gases injected continuously at different locations.1,2 This sequenced exposure to reactant gases defines the ALD cycle that typically consists of precursor and coreactant dosing with two intermediate purge zones. Within one ALD cycle, the growth of the material occurs through self-limiting half-reactions and, under the right temperature and dosing conditions, saturated growth is reached. This self-limiting nature of the growth enables precise thickness control, superior film quality, excellent uniformity on large-area substrates, and unparallel conformality over substrates having high aspect ratio structures.

Compared to conventional temporal ALD, spatial ALD offers the advantage of shorter cycle times which, in turn, determine higher throughput values. More specifically, in temporal ALD, a stationary substrate is exposed to time-sequenced gas pulses, and the separation of the precursor and coreactant is obtained by purge steps. For certain processes, these purge steps are several times longer than the typical reaction times, thus leading to long total cycle times that can limit the throughput.3 Instead, in s-ALD, the use of high flows of inert gases continuously fed to the substrate can virtually eliminate long purge steps, therefore shortening the total cycle time. This translates into higher throughput values, thus making s-ALD an attractive alternative for high-volume applications such as electronics, displays, photovoltaics, and batteries.4–6 These applications can benefit from s-ALD as they can make use of the key ALD merits while keeping the production costs fairly low. Furthermore, when a plasma is used as highly reactive coreactant in the so-called plasma-enhanced s-ALD (PE-s-ALD) approach, surface reactions can proceed at relatively low temperatures. This is advantageous as it allows depositions on temperature-sensitive substrates and it widens the available chemistry (e.g., in terms of precursors).7 As a result, more applications become feasible, including flexible devices requiring low-temperature processing.

PE-s-ALD can be performed at low pressure as well as at atmospheric pressure. Today, low-pressure PE-s-ALD is already used for high-volume manufacturing of semiconductor devices including state-of-the-art logic and memory.7–10 Instead, atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD is still in its infancy. For instance, besides our own work, PE-s-ALD of Al2O3 using trimethylaluminum [Al(CH3)3, TMA] and O2 plasma has, so far, only been reported by Hoffmann et al.11 and by Franke et al.12 Furthermore, although exceptionally compatible with continuous mode operation such as sheet-to-sheet and roll-to-roll, only a few industrially relevant atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD processes have been developed so far.13–17 These research works mainly focus on demonstrating how atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD can be an enabling deposition technology for some of the aforementioned high-volume applications. Studies on the underlying chemistry of this class of processes are still largely lacking. Next to the development of novel deposition processes, gaining a better understanding of the growth mechanisms of the films and how they are influenced by the process parameters is vital to the advancement of this technology toward future applications.

Recently, we introduced a diagnostic approach based on the combination of infrared absorption spectroscopy on exhausted gases and optical emission spectroscopy (OES) on the plasma zone in order to study the chemistry of atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD processes.18,19 For the prototypical material Al2O3, this approach was demonstrated by investigating the plasma half-cycle when using TMA in combination with Ar–O2 plasma at a temperature of 80 °C.18 The results were discussed in terms of combustion reactions of –CH3 ligands at the surface (leading to CO2 and H2O reaction products) and thermal ALD-like ligand exchange reactions by H2O produced as a combustion product (leading to CH4 reaction products). In the present study, we have analyzed the process at more deposition temperatures (up to 200 °C) to gain more insight into this surface chemistry from the temperature-dependent trends of the reaction products created. Moreover, we report in more detail about the growth and film properties of the Al2O3 films as a function of temperature. From the observations, we provide a refined growth mechanism and make a comparison with earlier results on temporal plasma-enhanced ALD of Al2O3.

A schematic of the atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD reactor is presented in Fig. 1(a).19 A cylindrical reactor chamber is placed into a convection oven. The chamber consists of a fixed gas injection head and a rotating substrate table. In this configuration, the precursor and the coreactant are separated in space by a high flow of N2 gas. Each reactant slot is provided with its own gas exhaust outlet. The N2 flow in between and around the reactants acts as a purge medium and as a gas barrier isolating the process gases from ambient air.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the diagnostic system implemented on the atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD reactor. (a) Gas-phase infrared spectroscopy of exhausted plasma gases and optical emission spectroscopy (OES) on the plasma-substrate region. (b) Cross section of the dedicated dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma source providing the optical fiber with a direct view on the plasma-substrate region through a transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) top electrode and a quartz dielectric. While OES measurements are performed, the substrate moves with a velocity v underneath the plasma source.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the diagnostic system implemented on the atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD reactor. (a) Gas-phase infrared spectroscopy of exhausted plasma gases and optical emission spectroscopy (OES) on the plasma-substrate region. (b) Cross section of the dedicated dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma source providing the optical fiber with a direct view on the plasma-substrate region through a transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) top electrode and a quartz dielectric. While OES measurements are performed, the substrate moves with a velocity v underneath the plasma source.

Close modal

A silicon wafer is placed on the rotating table at a distance of typically 20–250 μm from the reactant inlet slots. The exposure time of the substrate surface to the reactants is determined by the reactor geometry and the rotation speed. At a radial distance r from the center of the wafer, the exposure time to the precursor can be calculated as texp = l/v, where l is the width of the precursor slot (i.e., the width of the reaction zone where the precursor is dosed to the substrate surface) and v is the velocity of the substrate table. In the rotary lab-scale reactor, the velocity is defined by the rotation frequency expressed as number of rotations per minute (RPM). Therefore, longer exposures are achieved by rotating the substrate table at lower frequencies.

The atmospheric-pressure plasma used in the ALD experiments was generated by a Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) plasma source. In a DBD source, the plasma is ignited between a high voltage (HV) electrode and a grounded electrode which are separated by a dielectric.20 In the DBD source used for film deposition, alumina was used as the dielectric material. The plasma was ignited by means of a high voltage (HV) pulsed power supply, and the typical power density per dielectric barrier surface area is in the range 1–10 W/cm2.13,14

For the OES diagnostic study, a second dedicated DBD plasma source was used and its cross section is presented schematically in Fig. 1(b). In this design, the dielectric consists of a transparent quartz piece sandwiched between a grounded metal electrode and an HV voltage electrode. The grounded electrode is kept the same as in the previous configuration, whereas the HV top electrode is now made of a combination of silver and transparent conductive indium tin oxide (ITO). This specially designed DBD source provides a direct view on the substrate region through the transparent quartz/ITO configuration.

Al2O3 films were deposited on 150-mm diameter silicon wafers at 80, 150, and 200 °C using TMA as the precursor and Ar–O2 plasma as the coreactant. The TMA precursor was dosed to the reactor by using an Ar pick-up flow which is introduced into the precursor bubbler kept at room temperature. This pick-up flow through the bubbler is referred to as the TMA flow and was varied between 0.005 and 0.075 slm. Once leaving the bubbler, this flow is further diluted into Ar to reach a total flow of 1 slm which is transported to the chamber through heated lines. The coreactant mixture was kept constant using an O2 flow of 0.08 slm and an Ar flow of 2.8 slm, reaching a concentration of 20% O2 in Ar. Before each deposition, a step of 2 min of Ar–O2 plasma was employed to clean the surface of the Si-wafer. Unless indicated otherwise, the substrate was rotated underneath the fixed gas injection head using a rotation frequency for the substrate table of 30 RPM. This frequency translates into an exposure time of the substrate surface to the precursor equal to 133 ms.

Thickness and refractive index of the as-deposited films were measured ex situ by spectroscopic ellipsomety (SE) using a J. A. Woollam M2000 spectrometer. A Cauchy optical model was used to fit the ellipsometry data and determine thickness and refractive index of the layers. From the thickness values, the GPC was calculated. The values of the refractive index are reported here at 632 nm (2 eV).

A combination of Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy (RBS) and Elastic Recoil Detection (ERD) was used to analyze the chemical composition of the alumina films. RBS and ERD were performed by Detect99 using a Singletron system with a 3 MeV He+ beam. From the RBS/ERD results, the stoichiometry and the hydrogen content were obtained. The number of Al-atoms deposited per-cycle per nm2 and mass density were calculated using the RBS/ERD and the SE data.

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed to further characterize the film composition. FTIR absorption measurements were carried out on 140 nm thick Al2O3 films deposited on silicon wafers. The absorbance spectra were obtained with a dry N2-purged Bruker Tensor interferometer using a resolution of 6 cm−1 and averaging the signal over ten scans. A bare silicon wafer was used to acquire a background spectrum for each sample.

Gas-phase infrared absorption spectroscopy was performed by means of a quartz gas-cell inserted into the sample compartment of a Bruker VERTEX70 infrared interferometer. The exhausted plasma gas was fed into the gas-cell through of a stainless-steel line which was kept at room temperature. Before each experiment, the plasma line was flushed with 7 slm of N2 to purge residual gases off the system. After achieving a stable background with only very small trace amounts of residual H2O and CO2 (indicating the purging is very effective to keep out gases from the atmosphere), a reference spectrum was acquired by flowing only N2 through the plasma line. For each measurement, this reference spectrum is subtracted from the “ALD mode” spectrum. All infrared spectra of the exhaust plasma gas were recorded by using a collection time of 600 s at a resolution of 0.5 cm−1.

OES was performed directly on the plasma-substrate region by using the home-built transparent DBD plasma source illustrated in Fig. 1(b) and described in Sec. II A. A thermally resistant optical fiber was inserted into the plasma source providing a direct view to the substrate through the Ar–O2 plasma. To record the spectra, an Avantes spectrometer (AvaSpec-ULS2048 × 16) with a resolution of 0.5 nm was used. A background spectrum was acquired with no plasma ignition and subtracted from the “ALD mode” spectrum. During the OES analysis, a total integration time of 12 s was used for one single spectrum. The OES data presented in this work have been obtained by averaging the signal over a number of five recorded spectra. Likewise, the peak intensities reported here were calculated by averaging the values of the intensity over five spectra.

For both infrared and OES measurements, the spectra were acquired in “ALD mode,” where both TMA and plasma are activated on the substrate surface so that ALD reactions can occur and the gaseous reaction products can be identified (see the supplementary material48).

Figure 2 shows the growth and compositional data for Al2O3 films of 140 nm thick deposited at 80, 150, and 200 °C using an exposure time of 133 ms and a bubbler flow of 0.075 slm. In our previous work,18 we reported that both ALD half-cycles show saturated growth when these processing conditions are used at a temperature of 80 °C. Therefore, it is plausible that for the same conditions, the growth will also be saturated at higher temperatures. Looking at the temperature dependence, Fig. 2 shows a clear decrease of the GPC in terms of thickness. A decrease is also present for the GPC in terms of Al-atoms deposited per nm2 when going from 80 to 150 °C after which the GPC remained constant within the experimental accuracy. The mass density and refractive index slightly increase with temperature with the biggest effect again when going from 80 to 150 °C. In parallel, upon increasing the temperature, the H-content of the films largely decreases and the [O]/[Al] ratio approaches the value of 1.5 which corresponds to stoichiometric Al2O3.

FIG. 2.

Growth and compositional data for the Al2O3 films deposited at 80, 150, and 200 °C. For each temperature, an exposure time of 133 ms and a TMA flow of 0.075 slm were used. (a) Growth-per-cycle (GPC) in terms of thickness and Al-atoms deposited per nm2 as obtained by SE and RBS, respectively; (b) mass density and refractive index as measured RBS and SE; (c) H-concentration as measured by ERD; and (d) [O]/[Al] ratio as measured by RBS.

FIG. 2.

Growth and compositional data for the Al2O3 films deposited at 80, 150, and 200 °C. For each temperature, an exposure time of 133 ms and a TMA flow of 0.075 slm were used. (a) Growth-per-cycle (GPC) in terms of thickness and Al-atoms deposited per nm2 as obtained by SE and RBS, respectively; (b) mass density and refractive index as measured RBS and SE; (c) H-concentration as measured by ERD; and (d) [O]/[Al] ratio as measured by RBS.

Close modal

Comparing our GPC data with those reported in the literature, we find that our GPC value of 0.18 nm obtained at 80 °C is in agreement with the value of 0.17 nm reported by Hoffmann et al. for a similar atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD process.11 However, when comparing our results with the work by Potts et al.21 for the low-pressure temporal PE-ALD case, we find somewhat higher GPC values (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material48). This difference is potentially due to the difference in operating pressure (compare, e.g., the dependence of the GPC of Al2O3 on the H2O flow rate even when working under saturation conditions),22 but the exact reason is not yet clear.

The trend of a decreasing GPC with increasing temperature is in good agreement with previous reports for low-pressure ALD of Al2O3 where both O2 plasma and O3 were used as coreactants. For the low-pressure PE-ALD, Potts et al. observed a decrease in GPC and improved material characteristics within the temperature range between 25 and 300 °C.21 The same trend was found by Kim et al. using O3 as the coreactant.23 It is well accepted that the decrease of GPC with temperature is largely due to thermally activated dehydroxylation reactions which induce a lower density of –OH surface sites. This leads to a lower density of adsorption sites for TMA and hence to less TMA adsorption on the surface.24 This manifests in a decrease of Al-atoms deposited per nm2, as particular seen between 80 and 150 °C in Fig. 2(a).

In terms of material composition,18 the mass density and refractive index values found here are in agreement with the ones reported in the literature for the low-pressure PE-ALD case.25,26 The mass density increases from 2.7 g/cm3 at 80 °C to 3.0 g/cm3 at 200 °C. This increase leads to a larger change in GPC in terms of thickness compared to the GPC in terms of Al-atoms per nm2. Furthermore, the increase in density is accompanied by a reduction of the H-content in the film from 10 at. % to less than 5 at. %. This effect, together with the decrease in [O]/[Al] ratio from 1.9 at 80 °C to 1.5 at 200 °C, suggests that at higher temperatures less –OH groups are incorporated in the films as has also been observed by infrared spectroscopy measurements discussed below.

To further investigate the composition of the deposited layers, infrared absorption spectroscopy was carried out on the Al2O3 films. The results are shown in Fig. 3, and the assignment of the vibrational modes is listed in Table I. The broad peak in the region between 500 and 1000 cm−1 is attributed to the Al–O stretching mode and it slightly increases with temperature. This increase was also observed for Al2O3 layers prepared by PE-ALD and indicates that more Al–O bonds are created at higher temperatures.27 The intensity of the peak at 1050 cm−1 (indicative for the Si–O rocking mode) indicates that the interfacial SiOx layer between the Si-wafer and the Al2O3 film, as is commonly observed,27 is slightly thicker at elevated temperatures. The feature in the region 1400–1700 cm−1 is assigned to C–O vibrations which can be related to the presence of formate (COOH) and carbonate (CO32−) groups in the film.27–29 The decrease with temperature of these modes implies that less of these carbonaceous species are incorporated in the films when working at higher temperatures. The decreasing intensity of the broad O–H stretching mode at 2600–3800 cm−1 at higher deposition temperatures suggests that these films contain less –OH groups due to thermally activated dihydroxylation reactions. Superimposed on the broad O–H stretching mode, there is a contribution from the C–H stretching mode at 2900–3100 cm−1, which can be due to the incorporation of –CHx groups in the films. Overall, the data in Fig. 3 are in line with the RBS/ERD data in Fig. 2 showing lower H-content and improved stoichiometry at high temperatures.

FIG. 3.

Infrared absorbance spectra in the two wavenumber regions of interest for the Al2O3 films deposited by PE-s-ALD at 80, 150, and 200 °C: (a) 500–1700 and (b) 2000–4000 cm−1.

FIG. 3.

Infrared absorbance spectra in the two wavenumber regions of interest for the Al2O3 films deposited by PE-s-ALD at 80, 150, and 200 °C: (a) 500–1700 and (b) 2000–4000 cm−1.

Close modal
TABLE I.

Infrared vibrational modes and their peak positions in the infrared spectra as measured for the Al2O3 films.

Vibrational modeWavenumber range (cm−1)Reference
Al–O stretching 500–1000 27  
Si–O rocking 1050 27  
C–O stretching 1400–1700 27–29  
C–H stretching 2900–3100 27  
O–H stretching 2600–3800 27  
Vibrational modeWavenumber range (cm−1)Reference
Al–O stretching 500–1000 27  
Si–O rocking 1050 27  
C–O stretching 1400–1700 27–29  
C–H stretching 2900–3100 27  
O–H stretching 2600–3800 27  

To identify the species produced in the plasma half-cycles, the gases in the plasma exhaust were analyzed by infrared spectroscopy. In Fig. 4, the data are given for each deposition temperature. The absorbance peaks corresponding to O3, CH3OH, CO, CO2, CH4, CH2O, and H2O species were observed with the assignments of vibrational modes listed in Table II.

FIG. 4.

Gas-phase infrared absorption spectra of the exhausted plasma gases during growth of Al2O3 in ALD mode at 80, 150, and 200 °C (a). Zoomed-in view for (b) O3, (c) CO2, and (d) CH4/CH2O absorbance spectra. For each temperature, an exposure time of 133 ms and a TMA flow of 0.075 slm were used.

FIG. 4.

Gas-phase infrared absorption spectra of the exhausted plasma gases during growth of Al2O3 in ALD mode at 80, 150, and 200 °C (a). Zoomed-in view for (b) O3, (c) CO2, and (d) CH4/CH2O absorbance spectra. For each temperature, an exposure time of 133 ms and a TMA flow of 0.075 slm were used.

Close modal
TABLE II.

Infrared vibrational modes with assigned species and (main) peak position in the gas-phase infrared spectra measured on the exhaust plasma gas. The assignments are based on the gas-phase infrared spectra of the listed species as reported in the NIST database.30 

SpeciesVibrational modeWavenumber peak position (cm−1)
O3 Asymmetric stretching 1040 
CH3OH C–O stretching 1033 
CH4 Degenerate deformation 1306 
H2Bending 1594 
CH2C–O stretching 1746 
CO Stretching 2143 
CO2 Asymmetric stretching 2349 
CH2C–H symmetric stretching 2782 
CH4 Degenerate stretching 3018 
H2Asymmetric stretching 3756 
SpeciesVibrational modeWavenumber peak position (cm−1)
O3 Asymmetric stretching 1040 
CH3OH C–O stretching 1033 
CH4 Degenerate deformation 1306 
H2Bending 1594 
CH2C–O stretching 1746 
CO Stretching 2143 
CO2 Asymmetric stretching 2349 
CH2C–H symmetric stretching 2782 
CH4 Degenerate stretching 3018 
H2Asymmetric stretching 3756 

The detected O3 is produced in the atmospheric-pressure O2 plasma indifferent from the ALD reactions. The other species are formed in surface and gas-phase reactions during the removal of –CH3 ligands from the surface in the ALD cycle.18Figure 4 shows that the magnitude of absorbance by O3, CO2, CH4, and CH2O is affected by the deposition temperature. A large effect is seen for the absorbance of O3 which strongly reduces with increasing temperature. The absorbance for CO2 slightly decreases with increasing temperature whereas the absorbance for H2O shows no clear trend with temperature. The absorbances for CH4 and CH2O show an increasing trend. In particular, CO2 and CH4 show opposite temperature trends which suggest that these species originate from different reaction pathways.

To study surface saturation, infrared spectra were taken at the three deposition temperatures for different TMA flows. The surface saturation can be investigated by evaluating the integrated area of the absorbance peaks for the most relevant species.18Figure 5 depicts the integrated peak areas for CO2, H2O, CH4, and CH2O as a function of the TMA flow. At each temperature, the densities of all components show saturated behavior at a TMA flow of 0.035 slm, meaning that this flow is sufficient to saturate the surface with precursor molecules.

FIG. 5.

Integrated infrared absorbance peaks of CO2 (2349 cm−1), H2O (3656 cm−1), CH4 (3018 cm−1), and CH2O (2782 cm−1) as a function of the TMA flow during Al2O3 growth at 80, 150, and 200 °C, respectively, and using an exposure time of 133 ms. The dashed lines serve as a guide to the eye.

FIG. 5.

Integrated infrared absorbance peaks of CO2 (2349 cm−1), H2O (3656 cm−1), CH4 (3018 cm−1), and CH2O (2782 cm−1) as a function of the TMA flow during Al2O3 growth at 80, 150, and 200 °C, respectively, and using an exposure time of 133 ms. The dashed lines serve as a guide to the eye.

Close modal

In addition to the saturation behavior, Fig. 5 can also provide further insights into the influence of temperature on the reaction mechanism. A comparison of the absorbance values for different deposition temperatures shows that, although CO2 and H2O are both combustion products, their absorbance values exhibit different temperature-dependent behaviors. Specifically, CO2 absorbance decreases with temperature pointing to a decrease of combustion reactions at higher temperatures whereas the H2O absorbance does not show a clear temperature trend. The H2O absorbance appears to be similar for 80 and 200 °C while it is somewhat lower for 150 °C. The absorbance values of CH4 and CH2O exhibit an increase with temperature when going from 80 to 200 °C.

To gain insight into the nature and behavior of the excited plasma species, we carried out OES studies directly on the region where the plasma interacts with the substrate. In the spectral range between 300 and 600 nm, we identified the emission bands of OH at 309 nm (A2Σ+ → X2Π) and CH at 389 nm (B2Σ → X2Π) and at 431 nm (A2Δ → X2Π) (b4Σg → a4Πu). Furthermore, the emission from Ar at 415–426 nm (5p → 4 s) and the first negative system (FNS) of O2+ at 557.8 nm were observed.

Figure 6(a) shows parts of the OES spectra corresponding to a TMA flow of 0.075 slm. The emission from excited OH and CH species indicates the presence of reaction products in the plasma, while the Ar and O2+ lines are characteristic for the emission spectrum of the Ar–O2 plasma. More specifically, the OH and CH excited fragments are produced by electron collisions in the plasma involving reaction products from the surface. Most likely, the OH emission originates from electron-induced dissociative excitation of H2O molecules,31 

H2O+eOH+H+e,
(1)

with OH* indicated electronically excited OH. The CH emission can originate from similar dissociative excitation reactions of species such as CH4, CH2O, and CH3OH which are also reaction products of the surface reactions.32,33Figure 6(a) shows that the intensity of the OH emission band decreases with temperature, thus pointing to a lower content of H2O in the plasma. The CH emission remains roughly constant but this trend cannot simply be assigned to one of the reaction products. The O2+ emission band remains largely constant indicating that the plasma is not affected significantly by the temperature change.

FIG. 6.

OES results for of PE-s-ALD of Al2O3 at 80, 150, and 200 °C. (a) OES emission spectrum in ALD mode obtained at a TMA flow of 0.075 slm and an exposure time of 133 ms. (b) Peak intensity of OH, CH, and O2+ emission lines as a function of the TMA flow. The dashed lines serve as a guide to the eye.

FIG. 6.

OES results for of PE-s-ALD of Al2O3 at 80, 150, and 200 °C. (a) OES emission spectrum in ALD mode obtained at a TMA flow of 0.075 slm and an exposure time of 133 ms. (b) Peak intensity of OH, CH, and O2+ emission lines as a function of the TMA flow. The dashed lines serve as a guide to the eye.

Close modal

Figure 6(b) shows the peak intensities for the OH, CH, and O2+ emission lines as a function of the precursor flow. Similar to the case of the infrared data in Fig. 5, the peak intensity of the OH and CH emission bands indicates that saturation is reached at a TMA flow of 0.035 slm for each deposition temperature. Conversely, the intensity of the O2+ peak decreases with increasing TMA flows and reaches a saturated value at 0.01 slm.

Comparing the results presented in Fig. 6 with those in Fig. 5 shows that the decrease of the OH emission—attributed to a decrease in H2O—behaves somewhat different from the H2O absorbance which does not show a clear trend with temperature. On the other hand, it does agree with the decrease of the CO2 absorbance when considering that H2O and CO2 are both combustion products. Therefore, we hypothesize that the fact that the H2O absorbance does not show a clear dependence with temperature is due to a reduced sensitivity of this measurement for trends with temperature (H2O can easily accumulate in the system and is harder to purge). The fact that the CH emission does not show a clear trend with temperature—different from the CH4 absorbance—might indicate that the CH emission is only due to CH4 but potentially also due to CH2O and CH3OH.

The results of the plasma half-cycle investigation presented in Sec. III can clarify how the deposition temperature affects the underlying chemistry of the atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD process of Al2O3. On the base of our observations, we will now discuss a refinement of the growth mechanism that was proposed in our earlier work for PE-s-ALD.18 

During the precursor step, TMA molecules adsorb on the surface in their reaction with –OH surface groups and the first half-cycle can be described by the following reaction:

AlOH+Al(CH3)3AlOAl(CH3)2+CH4.
(2)

Here, –CH3 ligands are protonated to volatile CH4 molecules and, at the end of the precursor step, the surface will be covered with the adsorbed TMA fragments with their remaining unreacted –CH3 ligands. In Reaction (2), we have assumed that TMA adsorbs monofunctionally, i.e., through the exchange of one –CH3 ligand, but bifunctional adsorption can also occur.34 Upon a temperature increase, dehydroxylation reactions cause two adjacent –OH groups to react and leave the surface as a H2O molecule. As a result, at higher temperatures, there is a reduced density of –OH surface groups acting as reactive sites for the incoming TMA molecules, thus leading to less precursor adsorption.23,26,34 This is particularly clear from the Al-atoms deposited per nm2 when increasing the temperature from 80 to 150 °C [Fig. 2(a)].

For the plasma half-cycle, the infrared spectra on the exhaust plasma gas have shown the presence of O3 in the Ar–O2 plasma. This is in line with the fact that O3 is naturally produced in atmospheric-pressure O2 plasmas due to following reaction sequence:20,35–37

e+O22O+e,
(3)
O+O2+MO3+M,
(4)

with M in the temperature three-body reaction most likely being O2 and Ar. As a consequence, the Ar–O2 plasma coreactant in our conditions is a mixture composed of O2 plasma species such as O-atoms as well as O3. Both types of species can take part in the ligands removal through combustion-like reactions.29,31,38,39 In particular, O3 reacts with the surface by decomposing into O2 and O which will then initiate the surface reations.40 Such decomposition reactions can happen at any surface and not just under ALD conditions through three-step dissociative reactions.41,42 For Al2O3 surfaces, Knoops et al. showed that the O3 surface recombination probability is rather low and that this value does not vary much with temperature within the range 100–200 °C.43 Hence, the decreasing trend of O3 absorbance with increasing temperature might be largely due to ALD surface reactions or less O3 is effectively produced at higher temperatures through reaction (4).37 

Assuming that O-atoms from the O2 plasma as well as from O3 dissociation are involved in the surface chemistry during the coreactant half-cycle, the O-atoms react with the methylated surface by insertion into the Al–C bonds. The removal of the –CH3 ligands is then driven by combustion reactions that lead to the production of CO2 and H2O according to

Al(CH3)+4OAlOH+CO2+H2O.
(5)

Moreover, H2O that has desorbed in these combustion-like reactions can react with the surrounding –CH3 ligands in a thermal ALD-like pathway according to

Al(CH3)+H2OAlOH+CH4.
(6)

Both the combustion byproducts (CO2 and H2O) and the thermal ALD-like byproduct, CH4 are identified in the infrared spectrum of the second half-cycle (Fig. 4), thus indicating that the reaction mechanism is characterized by the coexistence of these two reaction pathways. This indication is further confirmed by the fact that the temperature increase affects the combustion and thermal reaction pathways in different ways. On one side, thermally activated dehydroxylation causes a lower –OH density leading to a lower TMA uptake. As a consequence, at higher temperatures, less –CH3 ligands are available on the surface as adsorbates for subsequent O-activated reactions, and, therefore, the production of combustion byproducts decreases with temperaure.34,44 This is demonstrated by the decrease of CO2 absorbance and OH emission [Fig. 6(b)] with temperature. In particular, OH emission originates from electron-induced dissociative excitation of H2O molecules [Reaction (1)] that are formed in the ligand combustion. Hence, the decrease of OH emission confirms that less H2O is produced through combustion at higher temperature.31 The fact that the H2O absorbance in Fig. 5 does not show a clear dependence with temperature might be due to a reduced sensitivity of this measurement for the temperature trend as discussed in Sec. III C.

On the other hand, the thermal ALD reaction (6) becomes more relevant at higher temperatures and leads to more CH4 as concluded from the absorbance data in Fig. 5. For the thermal ALD process of TMA and H2O, the reaction kinetics study by Vandalon and Kessels showed that the reaction cross section of H2O to –CH3 increases with temperature.45 

Infrared spectra also show the absorbance from CH2O and CH3OH, two products not yet experimentally reported for PE-ALD of Al2O3. A Density Functional Theory (DFT) study by Fomengia et al. has predicted these species to be formed from reactions of TMA with both O2 plasma and O3. In that work, the following reactions have been reported under saturation conditions:18,39

(Al(CH3))3+2OAlOH+(Al(CH3))2+CH2O,
(7)
O(Al(CH3))3+6OAlOH+AlO2(CH2)+AlOCHO+OH+CH3OH.
(8)

As these species have not been observed in the studies of the low-pressure PE-ALD case, we speculate that the use of an atmospheric-pressure plasma with a higher density of O-atoms may create conditions favorable to the formation of these species. In addition to surface reactions, it is also possible that these CH-containing species are produced in gas-phase reactions occurring in the plasma. These gas-phase reactions can start with CH4 released into the plasma due to the thermal ALD-like reactions.32,46,47 The fact that more thermal ALD-like reactions occur at higher temperatures producing more CH4 is in line with the increased intensity of CH2O at higher temperatures. Yet, the presence of reactions (7) and (8) can certainly not be excluded.

The atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD deposition process of Al2O3 from TMA and Ar–O2 plasma was investigated with a combination of thin-film and gas-phase spectroscopic diagnostic techniques within the temperature range from 80 to 200 °C. The thin-film analysis revealed insight into the temperature dependence of the growth-per-cycle (GPC) and film composition, and a comparison with the low-pressure case of PE-ALD of Al2O3 was made. The combination of infrared absorbance spectroscopy and optical emission spectroscopy diagnostics was used to identify the gas-phase species involved in the underlying chemistry of the plasma half-cycle. The production of these species was studied as a function of the precursor flow and processing temperature.

These investigations allowed to identify those process conditions giving surface saturation and to gain insight into the growth mechanism. By studying the produced byproducts as a function of temperature, we found that the –CH3 ligands are removed by both combustion reactions and thermal ALD-like reactions. The combustion reactions are initiated by the O2 plasma species yielding CO2 and H2O, whereas the thermal reactions are initiated by H2O molecules and result into CH4 production. These two reaction pathways are affected differently by the temperature change. Upon a temperature increase, thermal dehydroxylation causes a lower density of –OH sites yielding less TMA adsorption. In turn, less –CH3 ligands are available to be combusted to CO2 and H2O at higher temperatures. At the same time, the increased reactivity of H2O at higher temperatures favors the activation of more thermal ALD-like reactions such that more CH4 is formed. This CH4 can undergo further gas-phase dissociation in the plasma to form CH2O although surface chemical reactions are also possible during ALD.

The reaction mechanism proposed for the PE-s-ALD process of Al2O3 appears to be very similar to the reaction mechanism for temporal PE-ALD at low pressures although for the earlier investigations no temperature dependence for the production of reaction products was available. The current study provides, therefore, additional insight. Moreover, the role of O3 might be smaller for PE-ALD at low pressures as the production of O3 is enhanced at higher temperatures. Another difference is that we have clearly observed CH3OH and CH2O in this work. These species were not observed in the low-pressure case which can imply an influence of the atmospheric pressure although it could also be due to an enhanced sensitivity of the diagnostic approach applied.

Finally, we want to highlight that this complementary spectroscopy diagnostic approach can also be employed to study other materials and processes, thus, expanding the fundamental knowledge existing on atmospheric-pressure PE-s-ALD and contributing to further advancement of this emerging technique.

The authors would like to acknowledge the Material Innovation Institute M2i, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO, and the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO (Holst Centre) for their financial support (NWO-M2i Contract No. F61.4.15561). The authors acknowledge the help provided by F. Grob for the help provided at the ALD reactor. Finally, we acknowledge Y. Creyghton for his contribution to the plasma source design.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

M. A. Mione: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). V. Vandalon: Conceptualization (supporting); Investigation (supporting). W. M. M. Kessels: Conceptualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). F. Roozeboom: Funding acquisition (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – original draft (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.

1.
P.
Poodt
,
D. C.
Cameron
,
E.
Dickey
,
S. M.
George
,
V.
Kuznetsov
,
G. N.
Parsons
,
F.
Roozeboom
,
G.
Sundaram
, and
A.
Vermeer
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
30
,
010802
(
2012
).
2.
D.
Muñoz-Rojas
,
V.
Huong Nguyen
,
C.
Masse de la Huerta
,
C.
Jiménez
, and
D.
Bellet
, “
Spatial atomic layer deposition
,” in
Chemical Vapor Deposition for Nanotechnology
, edited by P. Mandracci (IntechOpen, London,
2019
), pp
3
27
, ISBN 978-1-78984-960-8.
3.
A. W.
Ott
,
J. W.
Klaus
,
J. M.
Johnson
, and
S. M.
George
,
Thin Solid Films
292
,
135
(
1997
).
4.
J.
Sun
 et al,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
29
,
721
(
2008
).
5.
A.
Illiberi
,
F.
Roozeboom
, and
P.
Poodt
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
4
,
268
(
2012
).
6.
D. H.
Levy
,
D.
Freeman
,
S. F.
Nelson
,
P. J.
Cowdery-Corvan
, and
L. M.
Irving
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
92
,
192101
(
2008
).
7.
H. C. M.
Knoops
,
T.
Faraz
,
K.
Arts
, and
W. M. M.
Kessels
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
37
,
030902
(
2019
).
8.
TEL
, https://www.tel.com/product/nt333.html (accessed 12 August 2022).
9.
Wonik IPS
, http://www.ips.co.kr/en (accessed 12 August 2022).
11.
L.
Hoffmann
 et al,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
,
4171
(
2017
).
12.
S.
Franke
 et al,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
35
,
01B117
(
2017
).
13.
Y.
Creyghton
,
A.
Illiberi
,
M. A.
Mione
,
W.
van Boekel
,
N.
Debernardi
,
M.
Seitz
, and
F.
Roozeboom
,
ECS Trans.
75
,
11
(
2016
).
14.
F. J.
van den Bruele
,
M.
Smets
,
A.
Illiberi
,
Y.
Creyghton
,
P.
Buskens
,
F.
Roozeboom
, and
P.
Poodt
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
33
,
01A131
(
2015
).
15.
M. A.
Mione
,
I.
Katsouras
,
Y.
Creyghton
,
W.
van Boekel
,
J.
Maas
,
G.
Gelinck
,
F.
Roozeboom
, and
A.
Illiberi
,
ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol.
6
,
N243
(
2017
).
16.
L.
Hoffmann
 et al,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
36
,
01A112
(
2018
).
17.
L.
Hoffmann
,
K. O.
Brinkmann
,
J.
Malerczyk
,
D.
Rogalla
,
T.
Becker
,
D.
Theirich
,
I.
Shutsko
,
P.
Görrn
, and
T.
Riedl
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
,
6006
(
2018
).
18.
M. A.
Mione
,
R.
Engeln
,
V.
Vandalon
,
W. M. M.
Kessels
, and
F.
Roozeboom
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
115
,
083101
(
2019
).
19.
M. A.
Mione
,
V.
Vandalon
,
A.
Mameli
,
W. M. M.
Kessels
, and
F.
Roozeboom
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
125
,
24945
(
2021
).
20.
U.
Kogelschatz
,
Plasma Chem. Plasma Process.
23
,
1
(
2003
).
21.
S. E.
Potts
,
W.
Keuning
,
E.
Langereis
,
G.
Dingemans
,
M. C. M.
van de Sanden
, and
W. M. M.
Kessels
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
157
,
P66
(
2010
).
22.
R.
Matero
,
A.
Rahtu
,
M.
Ritala
,
M.
Leskelä
, and
T.
Sajavaara
,
Thin Solid Films
368
,
1
(
2000
).
23.
S. K.
Kim
,
S. W.
Lee
,
C. S.
Hwang
,
Y.-S.
Min
,
J. Y.
Won
, and
J.
Jeong
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
153
,
F69
(
2006
).
24.
C. E.
Nelson
,
J. W.
Elam
,
M. A.
Cameron
,
M. A.
Tolbert
, and
S. M.
George
,
Surf. Sci.
416
,
341
(
1998
).
25.
M. D.
Groner
,
F. H.
Fabreguette
,
J. W.
Elam
, and
S. M.
George
,
Chem. Mater.
16
,
639
(
2004
).
26.
E.
Langereis
,
M.
Bouman
,
J.
Keijmel
,
S.
Heil
,
M. C. M.
van de Sanden
, and
W. M. M.
Kessels
,
ECS Trans.
16
,
247
(
2008
).
27.
V.
Verlaan
,
L. R. J. G.
van den Elzen
,
G.
Dingemans
,
M. C. M.
van de Sanden
, and
W. M. M.
Kessels
,
Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys.
7
,
976
(
2010
).
28.
V. R.
Rai
,
V.
Vandalon
, and
S.
Agarwal
,
Langmuir
28
,
350
(
2012
).
29.
D. N.
Goldstein
,
J. A.
McCormick
, and
S. M.
George
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
112
,
19530
(
2008
).
30.
NIST Chemistry WebBook
, https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/ (accessed 5 July 2021).
31.
S. B. S.
Heil
,
J. L.
van Hemmen
,
M. C. M.
van de Sanden
, and
W. M. M.
Kessels
,
J. Appl. Phys.
103
,
103302
(
2008
).
32.
R. J. H.
Klein-Douwel
,
J.
Luque
,
J. B.
Jeffries
,
G. P.
Smith
, and
D. R.
Crosley
,
Appl. Opt.
39
,
3712
(
2000
).
33.
M. C.
Branch
,
M. E.
Sadequ
,
A. A.
Alfarayedhi
, and
P. J.
Van Tiggelen
,
Combust. Flame
83
,
228
(
1991
).
34.
E.
Langereis
,
J.
Keijmel
,
M. C. M.
van de Sanden
, and
W. M. M.
Kessels
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
92
,
231904
(
2008
).
35.
A.
Schütze
,
J. Y.
Jeong
,
S. E.
Babayan
,
J.
Park
,
G. S.
Selwyn
, and
R. F.
Hicks
,
IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.
26
,
1685
(
1998
).
36.
B.
Eliasson
,
M.
Hirth
, and
U.
Kogelschatz
,
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
20
,
1421
(
1987
).
37.
S. W.
Benson
and
A. E.
Axworthy
,
J. Chem. Phys.
26
,
1718
(
1957
).
38.
V. R.
Rai
,
V.
Vandalon
, and
S.
Agarwal
,
Langmuir
26
,
13732
(
2010
).
39.
G. N.
Fomengia
,
M.
Nolan
, and
S. D.
Elliott
,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
20
,
22783
(
2018
).
40.
S. D.
Elliott
,
G.
Scarel
,
C.
Wiemer
,
M.
Fanciulli
, and
G.
Pavia
,
Chem. Mater.
18
,
3764
(
2006
).
41.
W.
Li
,
G. V.
Gibbs
, and
S. T.
Oyama
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
120
,
9041
(
1998
).
42.
S. T.
Oyama
,
Catal. Rev.
42
,
279
(
2000
).
43.
H. C. M.
Knoops
,
J. W.
Elam
,
J. A.
Libera
, and
W. M. M.
Kessels
,
Chem. Mater.
23
,
2381
(
2011
).
44.
A.
Rahtu
,
T.
Alaranta
, and
M.
Ritala
,
Langmuir
17
,
6506
(
2001
).
45.
V.
Vandalon
and
W. M. M.
Kessels
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
108
,
011607
(
2016
).
46.
A.
Indarto
,
J. W.
Choi
,
H.
Lee
, and
H. K.
Song
,
Chinese Sci. Bull.
53
,
2783
(
2008
).
47.
L.
Wang
,
Y.
Yi
,
H.
Guo
, and
X.
Tu
,
ACS Catal.
8
,
90
(
2018
).
48.
See the supplementary material at https://www.scitation.org/doi/suppl/10.1116/6.0002158 for the method used to analyze the infrared and OES spectra.

Supplementary Material