The authors report on high spectral responsivity (SnxGa1 − x)2O3 Schottky UV photodetectors grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy on β-Ga2O3 substrates. Schottky devices exhibited peak responsivities ranging from 49 to 194 A/W, with peak responsivity and wavelength position increasing systematically for higher Sn concentration from x = 0.01 to 0.18. Dark currents for the devices ranged from <1 nA to 3 μA with rise and fall times in the 0.21–3 s time range, with slower response times likely due to photoconductive gain caused by trapped holes. Incorporation of up to 18% Sn into the tin gallium oxide (TGO) devices resulted in a redshift in the peak responsivity position, ranging from 5.19 to 4.86 eV, demonstrating tunability within the UV-C spectral region through Sn concentration adjustment. The authors believe this to be the highest reported responsivity for a planar Ga2O3-based Schottky photodetector to date, suggesting that TGO based UV-C Schottky detectors are an attractive approach toward deep-UV sensing applications.
I. INTRODUCTION
Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) has received considerable attention from researchers in recent years due to its potential application in both electronic and optoelectronic devices. Of particular interest has been deep ultraviolet (UV) detectors that operate in the 100–280 nm UV-C spectral region. Prior work in more established compounds such as AlGaN (Refs. 1–3) and MgZnO (Refs. 4–7) has realized some success, hindered primarily by materials’ challenges. Though much less investigated to date, Ga2O3 compounds have already demonstrated considerable progress, with multiple groups demonstrating UV metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM)8–12 and Schottky13,14 detectors with performance that in many cases is competitive to that of AlGaN and MgZnO.
While Ga2O3 epilayers have led to MSM and Schottky detectors that have strong UV photoresponse, prior work from our group has demonstrated that MSM devices based on (SnxGa1 − x)2O3 [tin gallium oxide (TGO)] can outperform Ga2O3 devices, with the incorporation of a small concentration (x < 0.1) of tin into Ga2O3 increasing device response by more than one order of magnitude.15 Here, we present for the first time the impact of Sn incorporation into TGO on the performance of UV-C Schottky detectors based on TGO epilayers grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on native β-Ga2O3 substrates.
II. EXPERIMENT
Tin gallium oxide epilayers were grown by plasma-assisted MBE on (010) pieces of n-type (n ∼ 5 × 1017–9 × 1018/cm3) β-Ga2O3 substrates, sourced from Tamura (Japan). Oxygen was supplied by an SVT Associates plasma source, and standard Knudsen effusion cells were used to source Sn and Ga. Prior to growth, substrates were annealed at 780 °C for 30 min with an oxygen flow rate of 1.4 sccm and an RF power of 300 W to reduce surface contamination and improve structural surface quality. Epitaxial growth of the TGO epilayers was done at a substrate temperature of 600 °C with 2.5 sccm of oxygen at 300 W, resulting in a typical MBE chamber pressure of 1.7 × 10−5 Torr. Epitaxial growth was carried out for 3 h at a typical growth rate of ∼80–90 nm/h, yielding an epilayer thickness of ∼0.25 μm. The epilayers were kept thin due to the short absorption length of UV-C radiation in Ga2O3 (Ref. 16) and sub-100 nm depletion width expected in the Schottky structure at low reverse biases. X-ray diffraction (XRD) on the epilayers was carried out a PANalytical X'Pert Cu-kα1 beam (λ = 1.5405 Å), and Sn composition in the films was determined using Rutherford Back-Scattering (RBS). Schottky devices were fabricated using standard photolithography methods. A Ti/Al/Ni (20/100/50 nm) Ohmic back contact was formed on the entire rear side of the n-type β-Ga2O3 substrate, annealed at 500 °C for 60 s in nitrogen. Formation of the front side contact consisted of two primary steps accomplished with a standard lift-off procedure: (1) deposition of a high work function Pt (ϕm ∼ 5.5 eV) semitransparent layer (∼3 nm) and (2) subsequent deposition of a thicker Ni/Au (20/130 nm) ring contact to aid in physical probing of the device. The thin Pt semitransparent contact enables deep-UV light transmission (estimated at ∼55% at λ = 245 nm) from the top side of the device while still providing a suitable Schottky barrier, though we have not optimized its thickness to determine the best trade-off between transmission and Schottky performance. Two Schottky device sizes were fabricated, small and large, with a mesa diameter of 300 and 500 μm, respectively.
The current-voltage (I-V) and temporal characteristics of the Schottky photodetectors were measured with a Keithley 2400 source-meter SMU using probe tips to contact specific devices on the sample surface. Spectral responsivity was measured using a Newport CS260 UV-VIS monochromator fitted with a 30 W deuterium lamp. Light incident on the device was measured using a calibrated Si photodiode to enable absolute responsivity values to be determined. The spot size was roughly 4 mm2 and was measured to have a power of 1.5 μW at 250 nm. When determining spectral responsivity for the devices, we measured incident power at each wavelength and factored in the area of the Schottky device in comparison to the spot size assuming uniform illumination.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1(a) shows the XRD data for several samples with varying Sn concentration. The data contain clear peaks from the β-Ga2O3 substrate located at 54.5°, 60.5°, and 61°, corresponding to the (203), (−801), and (020) planes, respectively. Also observed is a broader peak located between 59° and 60° that is found to shift to lower angles and broaden with increasing Sn concentration. RBS measurements of the epilayers grown with an Sn cell temperature of 660, 690, 750, and 780 °C indicated Sn concentrations of <1%, 7%, 13%, and 18%, respectively, demonstrating a direct relation between the Sn cell temperature and percentage incorporation of Sn in the epilayers. For low Sn concentrations in the TGO alloy, we expect that the epilayer retains the monoclinic crystal structure of the underlying β-Ga2O3 substrate, though this requires further investigation since no such study of this alloy has been done to date. While transmission electron microscopy of the epilayer and the interface is required to verify the exact crystal structure, we do note that if it is indeed in the monoclinic arrangement this broader peak at 59°–60° is likely the (113) TGO peak based on the Panalytical XRD database. The peak position of the (113) TGO peak as a function of Sn cell temperature is plotted in Fig. 1(b), demonstrating the systematic shift to lower angles with increasing Sn cell temperature (i.e., increasing Sn concentration from <1% to 18%). Based on the (113) peak position, we have calculated the lattice d-spacing for the epilayers in Fig. 1(b), showing a systematic increase for higher Sn concentrations.
XRD data (a) for TGO epilayers on n-type (010) Ga2O3 substrates and (b) observed shift and d-spacing of TGO (113) peak.
XRD data (a) for TGO epilayers on n-type (010) Ga2O3 substrates and (b) observed shift and d-spacing of TGO (113) peak.
TGO epilayers were fabricated into vertical Schottky devices. Figure 2 provides (a) a cross section of the basic device structure and (b) an optical photo of a full fabricated device showing the central circular Pt Schottky contact and top ring. Initial testing of the Schottky devices included measurement of the I-V characteristics with and without broad UV illumination directly from the 30 W deuterium light source (no monochromator). Figure 2(c) shows the typical I-V characteristics measured for the 300 μm (small) and 500 μm (large) TGO Schottky devices in the dark and with UV illumination from the deuterium lamp. The I-V characteristics follow the expected asymmetric behavior of a rectifying Schottky type device. The dark current was found to be in the nanoampere regime for most samples, offering an attractive noise floor that is competitive with other UV detectors. An exception was the lowest Sn concentration sample (<1% Sn) that was found to have a high dark current (microampere regime). We hypothesize that this may be due to Sn acting as a strong n-type dopant for low concentrations, making the epilayer very conductive in comparison to the TGO films with higher Sn concentrations. Table I provides a list of the dark currents measured for each sample. When illuminated with UV light, all devices show a strong increase in photocurrent that rises with increased reverse bias under constant UV illumination power [Fig. 2(c)]. While this initial test verifies strong UV photoresponse of the TGO Schottky devices, it does not verify the solar-blind properties.
TGO Schottky device cross section schematic (a), optical image of fabricated device (b), and typical I-V characteristics (c).
TGO Schottky device cross section schematic (a), optical image of fabricated device (b), and typical I-V characteristics (c).
Summary of temporal characteristics and peak responsivity for TGO devices at Va = −5 V.
Sn conc. (%) . | Rise (s) . | Fall (s) . | Dark current . | Peak respon. WL (λpeak) (mm) . | Rej. ratio (λpeak: 340 nm) . | Peak responsivity (A/W) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
τ1 . | τ2 . | τ1 . | τ2 . | |||||
<1 | 0.97 | 16.62 | 0.21 | 8.06 | 3.1 μA | 239 | 36:1 | 67 |
7 | 2.69 | 11.88 | 0.36 | 3.65 | 40.7 nA | 240 | 394:1 | 49 |
13 | 2.89 | 17.44 | 0.34 | 14.12 | 0.329 nA | 249 | 492:1 | 83 |
18 | 2.69 | 8.71 | 0.26 | 1.59 | 0.764 nA | 255 | 169:1 | 194 |
Sn conc. (%) . | Rise (s) . | Fall (s) . | Dark current . | Peak respon. WL (λpeak) (mm) . | Rej. ratio (λpeak: 340 nm) . | Peak responsivity (A/W) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
τ1 . | τ2 . | τ1 . | τ2 . | |||||
<1 | 0.97 | 16.62 | 0.21 | 8.06 | 3.1 μA | 239 | 36:1 | 67 |
7 | 2.69 | 11.88 | 0.36 | 3.65 | 40.7 nA | 240 | 394:1 | 49 |
13 | 2.89 | 17.44 | 0.34 | 14.12 | 0.329 nA | 249 | 492:1 | 83 |
18 | 2.69 | 8.71 | 0.26 | 1.59 | 0.764 nA | 255 | 169:1 | 194 |
To validate solar-blind functionality and determine the impact of Sn concentration on device properties, the spectral responsivity of the TGO detectors was measured for devices with Sn concentrations ranging from <1% to 18%. Figure 3(a) provides the measured spectral response of the different devices. We observe a clear redshift in the peak response energy position as the Sn concentration increases, consistent with our prior work on TGO grown on sapphire.15,17 This is captured in Fig. 3(b) where we plot the peak response energy position (circular symbol) as a function of Sn centration for the devices, showing a >300 meV redshift as Sn concentration increases from <1% to 18%. A redshift in the cutoff wavelength (10% peak responsivity) of the devices is also observed as Sn concentration is increased, demonstrating the ability to tune the spectral response of the Schottky detector through Sn concentration adjustment in the TGO. We also observe a measurable increase in absolute peak responsivity as the Sn concentration in the TGO is increased [see Fig. 3(b)]. For Sn concentrations of 7% and above, peak responsivity increases from 49 A/W to a value of 194 A/W for devices with 18% Sn. This is similar to what we have reported for lateral MSM TGO detectors on sapphire.15,17 For the <1% Sn sample, we observe a responsivity that is slightly higher than the next lowest Sn concentration device (7% Sn). This may be attributed to the high conductivity of the sample, as noted earlier, though we cannot fully explain this observation. Nevertheless, the trend of strong increases in the peak response of the devices for higher Sn concentrations is clear. The response ratios of the devices were determined by comparing the peak responsivity for the devices, located at the respective peak wavelength, λpeak, to that at 340 nm. The values for λpeak are provided in Table I along with the corresponding response ratios. We found typical λpeak:340 nm response ratios to range from about 35 to 500.
Spectral responsivity (a) for various Sn concentration TGO Schottky detectors and (b) dependence of peak responsivity and peak response energy as a function of Sn concentration at Va = 5 V.
Spectral responsivity (a) for various Sn concentration TGO Schottky detectors and (b) dependence of peak responsivity and peak response energy as a function of Sn concentration at Va = 5 V.
Figure 4(a) provides the temporal characteristics of a 7% Sn TGO Schottky device. Such measurements were done for various TGO Schottky devices, and each was fitted with a double exponential to determine the τ1 and τ2 times for both the rise and fall segments. The basic equation used for fitting was
where A and B are scaling constants, t is the time, and τ1 and τ2 are the fast and slow decay constants, respectively. In all cases, the τ1 times (both rise and fall) were found to be much faster than the τ2 times. Figure 4(b) summarizes the τ1 results obtained from fitting of the data of both the rising and falling edges. All τ1 rise times were found to be in the second time range, with the 7%–18% TGO devices having slightly higher values than the <1% device. The τ1 fall times of the devices were considerably faster, with all devices having values in the milliseconds regime. A full summary of τ1 and τ2 times is provided in Table I. In general, we do not see a clear systematic dependence of the rise/fall τ1 values on Sn concentration, though we do note that the τ1 rise times of the higher (7%–18%) Sn concentration TGO devices suggest these have a faster rise time than very low alloy concentration (<1%) TGO devices. We do observe considerable variation in the rise/fall τ2 values of the TGO devices, but there does not appear to be any systematic trend with Sn concentration, suggesting that this is more dependent on the epitaxial film quality or fabrication process.
Measured and fitted temporal data from 7% Sn TGO device (a) and rise/fall τ1 times from fitting as a function of Sn concentration for devices.
Measured and fitted temporal data from 7% Sn TGO device (a) and rise/fall τ1 times from fitting as a function of Sn concentration for devices.
Despite the similarity of temporal characteristics, we find a significant variation in the peak responsivity of the TGO devices, with higher Sn concentrations leading to significant increases in the peak responsivity. As discussed earlier, this observation parallels our prior reported work on MSM TGO devices where higher Sn concentrations in TGO led to significant increases in peak responsivity.15
IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, we have demonstrated for the first time vertical TGO Schottky solar-blind detectors on β-Ga2O3 substrates. XRD suggests that TGO epilayers retain the monoclinic phase of the β-Ga2O3 substrate, with a broad peak at ∼60° in the ω-2θ scan that shifts to lower angles with increasing Sn concentration, though more investigation is required to verify the exact behavior. Solar-blind vertical Schottky devices demonstrated strong rectifying behavior with dark currents in the nanoampere regime. The energy position of the peak responsivity was found to systematically redshift by >300 meV for increasing Sn concentrations from <1% to 18% in the TGO epilayers. As we have reported for MSM TGO devices, peak responsivity increased for higher Sn concentrations, ranging from 49 to 194 A/W over the composition range investigated. Temporal measurements indicated rise and fall times in the second and millisecond time regimes, respectively, with no strong systematic trend with Sn concentration. This work demonstrates the viability of solar-blind TGO based vertical Schottky detectors, with tunable cutoff and peak responsivity wavelengths through Sn concentration adjustment, that offer improved responsivity over Ga2O3 counterparts.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to acknowledge support from the Army Research Office under Project Award No. W911NF-17-1-0377, monitored by Michael Gerhold.