Thin films of molybdenum carbonitride, MoCxNy, are deposited by low temperature chemical vapor deposition from Mo(CO)6 and NH3 in the temperature range 150–300 °C. At a substrate temperature of 200 °C and Mo(CO)6 pressure of 0.01 mTorr, the composition varies from MoC0.48N0.20 to MoC0.36N0.33 (i.e., greater nitrogen and less carbon content) upon increasing the ammonia pressure from 0.3 to 3.3 mTorr. At a constant Mo(CO)6 pressure of 0.01 mTorr and an NH3 pressure of 2 mTorr, the composition varies from MoC0.50N0.30 to MoC0.12N0.40 with increasing substrate temperature from 150 to 300 °C. Selected films grown at substrate temperatures of 150, 200, and 250 °C are superconducting with critical temperatures of 4.7, 4.5, and 5.2 K, respectively. Grazing incidence x-ray diffraction data indicate that the films are crystalline and isomorphous with the cubic phases of Mo2N and Mo2C. With a forward-directed flux of precursors toward the surface, film growth is highly conformal in microtrenches of aspect ratio 6, with step coverages of ∼0.85 and 0.80 at growth temperatures of 150 and 200 °C, respectively.

Molybdenum nitrides, carbides, and related ternary carbonitride alloys are widely used commercially as diffusion barriers,1,2 hard coatings,3–6 and catalysts7–10 due to their high chemical stability, mechanical hardness, and high electrical conductivity. In molybdenum nitride and carbide phases, the metal atoms are closely-packed and the nitrogen and carbon atoms are interstitial.11 Many of these phases are superconducting; Table I summarizes some published results for superconducting MoN and MoC phases. The variability in superconducting critical transition temperature, Tc, reflects several factors, such as disorder in MoN phases and stoichiometric variations.

Table I.

Reported superconducting molybdenum nitride and molybdenum carbide phases with structure, crystallinity, zero-field superconducting transition temperature Tc, and residual resistivity ratio (RRR), defined as the ratio of room temperature to low temperature resistivity. —, value not reported.

PhaseStructureCrystallinityTc (K)RRRReference
B1-MoN Cubic Single crystal 29.4a — 12  
B1-MoN Cubic Polycrystalline 12 1.7 13  
γ-Mo2Cubic Polycrystalline 0.8–1.0 14  
γ-Mo2Cubic Polycrystalline 0.97 15  
γ-Mo2Cubic Single crystal 4.5 43 16  
δ-MoN Hexagonal Single crystal 12 3.3 16  
δ-MoN Hexagonal Polycrystalline 4.0–12 — 17  
δ-MoN Hexagonal Polycrystalline 15.1 — 18  
η-Mo3C2 Hexagonal Polycrystalline 8.5 — 19  
η-Mo2Hexagonal Polycrystalline 7.4–8.9 — 20  
δ-MoC Cubic Polycrystalline 10.15–14.7 — 21  
δ-MoC Cubic Polycrystalline 12 — 22  
α-Mo2Orthorhombic Polycrystalline 6.0–7.3 — 20  
α-Mo2Orthorhombic — 12.2 — 23  
β-Mo2Hexagonal Polycrystalline 5.1–7.2 — 20  
β-Mo2Hexagonal Single crystal 8.0 — 24  
PhaseStructureCrystallinityTc (K)RRRReference
B1-MoN Cubic Single crystal 29.4a — 12  
B1-MoN Cubic Polycrystalline 12 1.7 13  
γ-Mo2Cubic Polycrystalline 0.8–1.0 14  
γ-Mo2Cubic Polycrystalline 0.97 15  
γ-Mo2Cubic Single crystal 4.5 43 16  
δ-MoN Hexagonal Single crystal 12 3.3 16  
δ-MoN Hexagonal Polycrystalline 4.0–12 — 17  
δ-MoN Hexagonal Polycrystalline 15.1 — 18  
η-Mo3C2 Hexagonal Polycrystalline 8.5 — 19  
η-Mo2Hexagonal Polycrystalline 7.4–8.9 — 20  
δ-MoC Cubic Polycrystalline 10.15–14.7 — 21  
δ-MoC Cubic Polycrystalline 12 — 22  
α-Mo2Orthorhombic Polycrystalline 6.0–7.3 — 20  
α-Mo2Orthorhombic — 12.2 — 23  
β-Mo2Hexagonal Polycrystalline 5.1–7.2 — 20  
β-Mo2Hexagonal Single crystal 8.0 — 24  
a

Calculated.

Molybdenum carbonitrides are often prepared by traditional high-temperature carbiding or nitriding methods. However, if the goal is to deposit uniformly-thick (i.e., conformal) films on topologically complex surfaces, such as is required for the coating or filling of high aspect ratio vias and trenches, then methods such as low temperature chemical vapor deposition (CVD) are necessary.25 Thin films of MoCxNy, where x = 0.20–0.55 and y = 0.10–0.47, have previously been deposited by CVD at relatively high temperatures of 450–650 °C from the single-source precursor Mo(NtBu)2(NHtBu)2.26 Films have also been deposited at much lower temperatures, 80–300 °C, by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition (ALD) from Mo(NtBu)2(NMe2)2 with an H2 + N2 plasma.27 One of the latter films, having the composition MoC0.45N0.08, was superconducting with a Tc of 8.8 K. In a separate study, MoCxNy films were grown from Mo(CO)6 and NH3 at 350–800 °C, and amorphous MoxN films have been grown by ALD from these same precursors in the narrow range of 155–170 °C.28 To date, there have been no demonstrations of the conformal deposition of MoCxNy films in deep features.

Here, we report thermal CVD of low resistivity crystalline molybdenum carbonitride films at substrate temperatures of 150–300 °C from the precursors Mo(CO)6 and NH3. Films grown at 150, 200, and 250 °C exhibit superconducting transition temperatures of 4.7, 4.5, and 5.5 K, respectively, with step coverages of 80%–85% in trenches of aspect ratio 6:1.

Growth of molybdenum carbonitride films is performed in a cold wall high vacuum chamber described elsewhere.29 The pressure of Mo(CO)6 is controlled by setting the temperature of the precursor reservoir in the range 20–40 °C; this precursor flows under its own vapor pressure (i.e., with no carrier gas) through the delivery tube, which is heated to 55 °C to avoid condensation of sublimed precursor. The Mo(CO)6 pressure in the chamber is 0.01–0.03 mTorr. Research grade NH3 (99.9992%) is delivered through a separate gas line, regulated by a mass flow controller, to establish a partial pressure of 0.3–9.0 mTorr in the chamber. All the gas delivery lines are pointed toward the substrate. This forward-directed expansion of gases increases the number of molecules which impinge on the substrate, i.e., the total fluxes on the substrate are higher than those due to the isotropic chamber pressure. In addition, the forward-directed flux will ballistically transport reactants down the axis of a deep feature such as a trench; this effect greatly enhances the coverage conformality (see Sec. III).

The substrate is heated radiatively to a growth temperature (Tg) of 150–300 °C, as measured by a K-type thermocouple attached to the sample holder. Film composition and resistivity measurements are performed on 300 nm SiO2/Si substrates. On a bare SiO2 surface, there is a considerable nucleation barrier for the deposition of Mo(CO)6 in the presence of NH3. To eliminate this barrier (and therefore to eliminate a nucleation delay time), a metallic seed layer of 1–2 nm of vanadium nitride (VN) is grown on SiO2 by CVD from tetrakis (dimethylamido) vanadium and ammonia at the same temperature subsequently used to grow MoCxNy. VN grows with essentially no nucleation barrier on SiO2 due to the facile transamination reaction,30 affording a large areal density of nucleation sites that coalesce into a very smooth initial layer. The root mean square (rms) roughness of a 1 nm thick VN film is 0.3 nm. Films grown on top of this layer tend to be smooth because the onset of growth roughening is minimized.31,32 The parallel conductance of the thin VN film is neglected in resistivity measurements. Microtrench samples of multiple aspect ratios, coated with a conformal VN seed layer as for the SiO2 substrates, are used for step coverage measurements.

Film thickness and microstructure are determined from cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Compositional depth profiles are obtained by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). Core level binding energy is measured by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using aluminum Kα radiation. In selected samples, 2 min of surface sputtering by 3 kV Ar+ ions is used to remove surface contamination due to air exposure. Film crystallinity is evaluated by grazing incidence x-ray diffraction (GIXRD). Surface roughness is measured by atomic force microscopy. Film resistivity is measured by the 4-point probe method down to 4 K.

In the absence of ammonia, chemical vapor deposition from 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 on SiO2 at 200 °C affords a molybdenum oxycarbide film at a growth rate of 8 nm/min. AES depth profile analysis of the film indicates that the composition is MoO0.3C0.7, which is consistent with previous reports of CVD from this precursor.33–35 When the film is grown under identical conditions but capped in situ with HfB2, the oxygen content is roughly the same as for the air-exposed sample. This result indicates that the oxygen content in the film originates mostly from carbonyl decomposition36 and not from postgrowth air exposure.

In the presence of 0.3 mTorr of NH3, CVD from 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 at 200 °C results in a molybdenum carbonitride film, MoC0.48N0.2, at a growth rate of 1.3 nm/min with 4 at. % oxygen impurity. A high resolution XPS scan after 2 min of Ar+ sputtering [spectra available in Supplementary Fig. S1 (Ref. 42)] shows the presence of carbon in aliphatic (284.6 eV) and carbidic (283.3 eV) states.27 The nitrogen 1s peak position is consistent with the nitride state (397.3 eV).26 The presence of carbon provides additional evidence that some of the carbonyl ligands decompose on the surface rather than desorb into the gas phase; it is, however, difficult to tell if carbidic states were produced during film growth or surface sputtering before XPS. Incorporation of nitrogen is the result of NH3 dissociation during growth.37–39 

If the ammonia pressure is increased and other deposition conditions are left unchanged [i.e., 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 at 200 °C], the nitrogen content increases and the carbon content decreases (Fig. 1): Film composition is MoC0.48N0.20, MoC0.44N0.25, and MoC0.36N0.33 when the NH3 pressure is 0.3, 1.3, and 3.3 mTorr, respectively. The oxygen content for all films remains relatively low at 3 at. %. The growth rate at 3.3 mTorr of NH3 is 1 nm/min, smaller than the rate of 1.3 nm/min at 0.3 mTorr NH3. To explore the dependence of growth rate on NH3 pressure more fully, experiments were conducted with 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 at 300 °C; the growth rate decreases from 3.0 to 0.3 nm/min when the NH3 pressure is increased from 0.3 to 9 mTorr. The reason for this effect is not fully understood; it may reflect changes in the adsorption kinetics of reactants as the composition of the growth surface changes (a dynamic surface coverage or a poisoning effect); alternatively, the forward-directed component of the precursor flux may be partially scattered away from the substrate at higher ammonia pressures.

Fig. 1.

Film composition vs NH3 pressure at a constant growth temperature of 200 °C and an Mo(CO)6 pressure of 0.01 mTorr. For each sample, Auger sputter depth profiling reveals an essentially constant bulk composition, reported on the plot. Error in Auger data reduction is ±1 at. %.

Fig. 1.

Film composition vs NH3 pressure at a constant growth temperature of 200 °C and an Mo(CO)6 pressure of 0.01 mTorr. For each sample, Auger sputter depth profiling reveals an essentially constant bulk composition, reported on the plot. Error in Auger data reduction is ±1 at. %.

Close modal

At higher temperatures, with 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 and 2 mTorr of NH3, the film becomes more N-rich and the O content decreases to <1 at. %: the composition is MoC0.5N0.3 at 150–200 °C, MoC0.32N0.27 at 250 °C, and MoC0.12N0.40 at 300 °C (Fig. 2). Increasing the temperature also increases the growth rate: At 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 and 0.4 mTorr of NH3, the growth rate is 0.4, 1.2, and 2 nm/min at 150, 200, and 250 °C, respectively.

Fig. 2.

Film composition vs temperature at constant Mo(CO)6 and NH3 pressures of 0.01 and 2 mTorr, respectively. For each sample, Auger sputter depth profiling reveals an essentially constant bulk composition, reported on the plot. Error in Auger data reduction is ±1 at. %.

Fig. 2.

Film composition vs temperature at constant Mo(CO)6 and NH3 pressures of 0.01 and 2 mTorr, respectively. For each sample, Auger sputter depth profiling reveals an essentially constant bulk composition, reported on the plot. Error in Auger data reduction is ±1 at. %.

Close modal

Cross-sectional SEM micrographs indicate that the MoCxNy films are smooth, dense, and featureless; a 25 nm thick film grown at 150 °C has an rms roughness of only 1.1 nm. The room temperature resistivities are 200–300 μΩ cm, and there was no clear trend for resistivity as a function of growth conditions. Films grown at 150 °C from 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 and 0.7 mTorr of NH3 have a Tc of 4.7 K. For films grown at an increased NH3 pressure of 1.3 mTorr at the same growth temperature, the resistance starts to decrease around 6 K, but zero resistance is not observed down to 4 K. We attribute this latter behavior to the existence of a second non-superconducting phase, as evidenced by XRD data discussed next. For films grown from 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 and 0.4 mTorr of NH3, the superconducting transition occurs at 4.5 K for films grown at 200 °C and at 5.2 K for films grown at 250 °C (Fig. 3). Comparable resistivities at low temperature and room temperature indicate disorder, residual resistivity ratio (RRR) ∼ 1.

Fig. 3.

Superconducting critical temperature of molybdenum carbonitride films grown at 150–250 °C from 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 and 0.7 (150 °C) or 0.4 (200–250 °C) mTorr of NH3. The thickness of the measured films ranges from 26 to 32 nm.

Fig. 3.

Superconducting critical temperature of molybdenum carbonitride films grown at 150–250 °C from 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 and 0.7 (150 °C) or 0.4 (200–250 °C) mTorr of NH3. The thickness of the measured films ranges from 26 to 32 nm.

Close modal

The films grown at 150–200 °C produce GIXRD peaks characteristic of (111), (200), and (220) reflections of the cubic phases γ-Mo2N and δ-Mo2C, whereas films grown at 250 °C appear amorphous [Fig. 4(a)].26,27 (The broad peak at ∼56° is due to the Si substrate.)40 However, distinction of the nitride and carbide phases is not possible because the 3% difference in cell constants falls within the ∼2°–3° line widths of the diffraction peaks. The films may be carbonitride solid solutions. The Scherrer formula applied to the (111) peak estimates an average grain diameter of 2 and 5 nm for films grown at 150 and 200 °C, respectively; however, the precision is limited by the low signal-to-noise and difficult to distinguish nitride and carbide phases. At a growth temperature of 250 °C, increasing the NH3 pressure results in broader x-ray peaks and a more dominant amorphous background, suggesting that nitrogen concentration reduces crystallinity [Fig. 4(b)]. The increased N content or the decreased crystallinity may be responsible for the loss of superconductivity16 when NH3 pressure was increased from 0.7 to 1.3 mTorr at 150 °C; we note, however, that some studies report an increase in Tc with disorder [see γ-Mo2 N in Table I (Refs. 14–16)]. Diffraction patterns for films grown at 300 °C from 0.01 mTorr Mo(CO)6 and either 0.3 or 9 mTorr NH3 exhibit the same peaks as those grown at lower temperatures [Fig. 4(a)].

Fig. 4.

(a) GIXRD pattern of superconducting molybdenum carbonitride films grown at substrate temperatures of 150–250 °C with 2.5 mTorr of NH3. Peak positions at 150 and 200 °C are consistent with cubic Mo2C and Mo2N (which have very similar lattice constants); the film grown at 250 °C is apparently amorphous. (b) GIXRD pattern of molybdenum carbonitride films grown at 250 °C with 2.5 mTorr of NH3 (the same data as in a) or 0.3 mTorr of NH3; peak assignments are the same as in part (a).

Fig. 4.

(a) GIXRD pattern of superconducting molybdenum carbonitride films grown at substrate temperatures of 150–250 °C with 2.5 mTorr of NH3. Peak positions at 150 and 200 °C are consistent with cubic Mo2C and Mo2N (which have very similar lattice constants); the film grown at 250 °C is apparently amorphous. (b) GIXRD pattern of molybdenum carbonitride films grown at 250 °C with 2.5 mTorr of NH3 (the same data as in a) or 0.3 mTorr of NH3; peak assignments are the same as in part (a).

Close modal

The conformal (step) coverage in trench structures with a depth:width (aspect) ratio of 6:1 is very good: the coverage is 0.85 when the films are grown at 150 °C from 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 and 1.3 mTorr of NH3 [Fig. 5(a)] and 0.80 when grown at 200 °C from 0.01 mTorr of Mo(CO)6 and 0.4 mTorr of NH3 (the latter conditions afford superconducting films with Tc = 4.5 K) [Fig. 5(b)]. These step coverages, which are reasonably high, were achieved by employing gas delivery lines that are pointed toward the substrate. Recent work, including calculation of ballistic particle transport in trench structures, shows that forward-directed flux from similarly arranged gas delivery lines greatly improves step coverage, and it can even create superconformal (bottom-up) coating profiles under suitable conditions.41 

Fig. 5.

Cross-sectional SEM micrographs of trenches with aspect ratio 6:1 coated conformally with molybdenum carbonitride at (a) 150 °C and (b) 200 °C.

Fig. 5.

Cross-sectional SEM micrographs of trenches with aspect ratio 6:1 coated conformally with molybdenum carbonitride at (a) 150 °C and (b) 200 °C.

Close modal

Low temperature CVD is used to deposit thin films of molybdenum carbonitride from Mo(CO)6 and NH3 in the temperature range 150–300 °C. Film compositions of MoC0.48N0.2 to MoC0.36N0.33 are achieved by increasing the NH3 pressure from 0.3 to 3.3 mTorr at a constant Mo(CO)6 pressure of 0.01 mTorr and a substrate temperature of 200 °C. At a constant Mo(CO)6 pressure of 0.01 mTorr and an NH3 pressure of 2 mTorr, the composition is ∼MoC0.5N0.3 from 150 to 200 °C, MoC0.32N0.27 at 250 °C, and MoC0.12N0.40 at 300 °C. Superconducting critical temperatures of 4.7, 4.5, and 5.2 K are reported for films grown at 150, 200, and 250 °C, respectively. Films are highly conformal in trenches of aspect ratio 6:1 and are composed of nanocrystalline grains of one or a mixture of cubic Mo2C and Mo2N phases; the high step coverages are attributed to the use of a low pressure CVD apparatus in which the flux of precursor to the surface is forward-directed.

Financial support from MIT-Lincoln Laboratories is gratefully acknowledged. G.S.G. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. CHE 1665191. J.R.A. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR 1410209.

1.
Y.
Jang
 et al.,
J. Alloys Compd.
663
,
651
(
2016
).
2.
Y.
He
and
J. Y.
Feng
,
J. Cryst. Growth
263
,
203
(
2004
).
3.
J.
Danroc
,
A.
Aubert
, and
R.
Gillet
,
Thin Solid Films
153
,
281
(
1987
).
4.
J.
Valli
,
U.
Mäkelä
, and
H. T. G.
Hentzell
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
4
,
2850
(
1986
).
5.
H.
Peter
,
M.
Nicolas
,
R.
Manfred
, and
L.
Francis
,
J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.
36
,
1023
(
2003
).
6.
S.
Wang
,
D.
Antonio
,
X.
Yu
,
J.
Zhang
,
A. L.
Cornelius
,
D.
He
, and
Y.
Zhao
,
Sci. Rep
.
5
,
13733
(
2015
).
7.
K. S.
Lee
,
H.
Abe
,
J. A.
Reimer
, and
A. T.
Bell
,
J. Catal.
139
,
34
(
1993
).
8.
T.
Kadono
,
T.
Kubota
, and
Y.
Okamoto
,
Catal. Today
87
,
107
(
2003
).
9.
S.
Gong
,
H.
Chen
,
W.
Li
,
B.
Li
, and
T.
Hu
,
J. Mol. Catal. A Chem.
225
,
213
(
2005
).
10.
R.
Kojima
and
K.-i.
Aika
,
Appl. Catal. A Gen.
219
,
141
(
2001
).
11.
I.
Jauberteau
,
A.
Bessadou
,
R.
Mayet
,
J.
Cornette
,
J. L.
Jauberteau
,
P.
Carles
, and
T.
Merle-Mejean
,
Coatings
5
,
656
(
2015
).
12.
D. A.
Papaconstantopoulos
,
W. E.
Pickett
,
B. M.
Klein
, and
L. L.
Boyer
,
Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter
31
,
752
(
1985
).
13.
N.
Savvides
,
J. Appl. Phys.
62
,
600
(
1987
).
14.
G.
Linker
,
R.
Smithey
, and
O.
Meyer
,
J. Phys. F Met. Phys.
14
,
L115
(
1984
).
15.
R.
Baskaran
,
A. V.
Thanikai Arasu
,
E. P.
Amaladass
,
L. S.
Vaidhyanathan
, and
D. K.
Baisnab
,
J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.
49
,
205304
(
2016
).
16.
H.
Luo
 et al.,
J. Phys. Chem. C
115
,
17880
(
2011
).
17.
A. Y.
Ganin
,
L.
Kienle
, and
G. V.
Vajenine
,
J. Solid State Chem.
179
,
2339
(
2006
).
18.
A.
Bezinge
,
K.
Yvon
,
J.
Muller
,
W.
Lengaeur
, and
P.
Ettmayer
,
Solid State Commun.
63
,
141
(
1987
).
19.
K.
Yamaura
,
Q.
Huang
,
M.
Akaishi
, and
E.
Takayama-Muromachi
,
Phys. Rev. B
74
,
184510
(
2006
).
20.
N.
Morton
,
B. W.
James
,
G. H.
Wostenholm
,
D. G.
Pomfret
,
M. R.
Davies
, and
J. L.
Dykins
,
J. Less-Common. Met.
25
,
97
(
1971
).
21.
N. S.
Athanasiou
,
Mod. Phys. Lett. B
11
,
939
(
1997
).
22.
C. I.
Sathish
 et al.,
J. Solid State Chem.
196
,
579
(
2012
).
23.
V.
Sadagapan
and
H. C.
Gatos
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
27
,
235
(
1966
).
24.
M. K.
Kolel-Veetil
,
S. B.
Qadri
,
M.
Osofsky
, and
T. M.
Keller
,
Chem. Mater.
17
,
6101
(
2005
).
25.
A.
Yanguas-Gil
,
Y.
Yang
,
N.
Kumar
, and
J. R.
Abelson
,
Surf. Films
27
,
1235
(
2009
).
26.
H.-T.
Chiu
,
W.-Y.
Ho
, and
S.-H.
Chuang
,
J. Mater. Res.
9
,
1622
(
2011
).
27.
A.
Bertuch
,
B. D.
Keller
,
N.
Ferralis
,
J. C.
Grossman
, and
G.
Sundaram
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
35
,
01B141
(
2016
).
28.
D. K.
Nandi
,
U. K.
Sen
,
D.
Choudhury
,
S.
Mitra
, and
S. K.
Sarkar
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
6
,
6606
(
2014
).
29.
S.
Jayaraman
,
Y.
Yang
,
D. Y.
Kim
,
G. S.
Girolami
, and
J. R.
Abelson
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
23
,
1619
(
2005
).
30.
R.
Fix
,
R. G.
Gordon
, and
D. M.
Hoffman
,
Chem. Mater.
5
,
614
(
1993
).
31.
S.
Babar
,
N.
Kumar
,
P.
Zhang
,
J. R.
Abelson
,
A. C.
Dunbar
,
S. R.
Daly
, and
G. S.
Girolami
,
Chem. Mater.
25
,
662
(
2013
).
32.
S.
Babar
,
T. T.
Li
, and
J. R.
Abelson
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
32
,
060601
(
2014
).
33.
M.-H.
Lo
and
W.-C. J.
Wei
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
80
,
886
(
1997
).
34.
M.
Kmetz
,
S. L.
Suib
, and
F. S.
Galasso
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
72
,
1523
(
1989
).
35.
W. C. J.
Wei
and
M. H.
Lo
,
Appl. Organomet. Chem.
12
,
201
(
1998
).
36.
R. F.
Howe
,
D. E.
Davidson
, and
D. A.
Whan
,
J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases
68
,
2266
(
1972
).
37.
W.
Zheng
 et al.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
135
,
3458
(
2013
).
39.
J. S. J.
Hargreaves
,
Coordin. Chem. Rev.
257
,
2015
(
2013
).
40.
C.
Weiss
,
M.
Rumpel
,
M.
Schnabel
,
P.
Loper
, and
S.
Janz
,
presented at the European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition
,
Paris, France,
2013
(unpublished).
41.
T. K.
Talukdar
,
W. B.
Wang
,
G. S.
Girolami
, and
J. R.
Abelson
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
36
,
051513
(
2018
).
42.
See supplementary material at https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5079805 for high resolution XPS results for one molybdenum carbonitride film.

Supplementary Material