In 1980, the U.S. Department of Energy gave the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory approval to design and build a tandem Mirror Fusion Test Facility (MFTF‐B) to support the goals of the National Mirror Program. We designed the MFTF‐B vacuum vessel both to maintain the required ultrahigh vacuum environment and to structurally support the 42 superconducting magnets plus auxiliary internal and external equipment. During our design work, we made extensive use of both simple and complex computer models to arrive at a cost‐effective final configuration. As part of this work, we conducted a unique dynamic analysis to study the interaction of the 32 000 tonne concrete‐shielding vault with the 2850 tonne vacuum vessel system. To maintain a vacuum of 2×10−8 Torr during the physics experiments inside the vessel, we designed a vacuum pumping system of enormous capacity. The vacuum vessel (4200 m3) has been fabricated, erected, and acceptance tests have been completed at the Livermore site. The rest of the machine has been assembled, and individual systems have been successfully checked. On October 1, 1985, we began a series of integrated engineering tests to verify the operation of all components as a complete system.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 1986
Research Article|
May 01 1986
The design, construction, and testing of the vacuum vessel for the tandem Mirror Fusion Test Facility Available to Purchase
Jerry W. Gerich
Jerry W. Gerich
University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550
Search for other works by this author on:
Jerry W. Gerich
University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 1742–1748 (1986)
Article history
Received:
November 22 1985
Accepted:
December 10 1985
Citation
Jerry W. Gerich; The design, construction, and testing of the vacuum vessel for the tandem Mirror Fusion Test Facility. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1 May 1986; 4 (3): 1742–1748. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.573970
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
What more can be done with XPS? Highly informative but underused approaches to XPS data collection and analysis
Donald R. Baer, Merve Taner Camci, et al.
Low-resistivity molybdenum obtained by atomic layer deposition
Kees van der Zouw, Bernhard Y. van der Wel, et al.
Perspective on improving the quality of surface and material data analysis in the scientific literature with a focus on x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
George H. Major, Joshua W. Pinder, et al.
Related Content
The (changing) MFTF vacuum environment
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (April 1983)
A tandem mirror in place at MFTF
Physics Today (September 1981)
The leak‐checking and testing of the first yin–yang magnet for the Mirror Fusion Test Facility (MFTF)
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (April 1983)
Diagnostic control, data acquisition, and data processing at MFTF‐B (invited)
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (August 1986)
Operation of cold‐cathode magnetron gauges in high magnetic fields
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (May 1986)