The flux distributions and enhancement factors for various gas doser designs typically used in surface science applications and chemisorption studies have been calculated and compared. The following conclusions, which will aid the experimentalist in the choice of doser design, can be made. (1) The enhancement factor expected for a given doser can easily be derived from Fig. 2. (2) The optimum doser design is a multichannel array with a radius slightly larger than that of the sample, and a distance from the sample < 10% of the sample diameter. (Complications of this design are discussed.) (3) Because of space requirements, the sample–doser distance must sometime be ≥40% of the sample diameter, in which cases it is better to use a cosine emitter. A good, very simple doser design is described that consists of a small cosine emitter with a sample–doser distance of 1/2 the sample diameter. This provides an enhancement factor >50% of the optimum theoretical enhancement, with only slight (±15%) flux gradients. (4) For a given doser distance, a needle doser provides the largest enhancement factor, but always has a very strong gradient in flux across the sample.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1985
Research Article|
March 01 1985
Design considerations for simple gas dosers in surface science applications Available to Purchase
Charles T. Campbell;
Charles T. Campbell
Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Search for other works by this author on:
Steven M. Valone
Steven M. Valone
Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Search for other works by this author on:
Charles T. Campbell
Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Steven M. Valone
Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 408–411 (1985)
Article history
Received:
August 23 1984
Accepted:
December 09 1984
Citation
Charles T. Campbell, Steven M. Valone; Design considerations for simple gas dosers in surface science applications. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1 March 1985; 3 (2): 408–411. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.573230
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
What more can be done with XPS? Highly informative but underused approaches to XPS data collection and analysis
Donald R. Baer, Merve Taner Camci, et al.
Low-resistivity molybdenum obtained by atomic layer deposition
Kees van der Zouw, Bernhard Y. van der Wel, et al.
Perspective on improving the quality of surface and material data analysis in the scientific literature with a focus on x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
George H. Major, Joshua W. Pinder, et al.
Related Content
On the design of capillary and effusive gas dosers for surface science
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (April 1995)
A simple means for reproducibly dosing low vapor pressure and/or reactive gases to surfaces in ultrahigh vacuum
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (January 1991)
A multi-molecular beam/infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy apparatus for probing mechanisms and kinetics of heterogeneously catalyzed reaction from ultrahigh vacuum to near-ambient pressure conditions
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (January 2025)
Temperature-programmed desorption spectrometer combining minimum gas load, fast substrate replacement, and comprehensive temperature control
Chin. J. Chem. Phys. (August 2023)
Multifunctional ultra-high vacuum apparatus for studies of the interactions of chemical warfare agents on complex surfaces
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (January 2014)