The superhardness effect of TiSiN nanocomposite films is closely related to the thickness of the interfacial phase, Si3N4. The influence of the thickness of Si3N4 on the growth structure and mechanical properties of TiSiN nanocomposite films was determined by studying TiNSi3N4 multilayers with different thicknesses of Si3N4 layers to reveal the strengthening mechanism of the nanocomposite films. The results show that Si3N4, which is amorphous in single film, can exist as a crystalline structure in TiNSi3N4 multilayers when the thickness of the Si3N4 layers is less than 0.7nm because of the “template effect” of TiN. As a result, TiN and Si3N4 layers form a coherent epitaxial growth with a preferred orientation. As a result, the multilayers exhibit a superhardness effect. When the thickness is greater than 0.7nm, Si3N4 exists as an amorphous structure and prevents TiN from coherent epitaxial growth with it, resulting in the decrease of the hardness and elastic moduli of the multilayers. The experiments reveal that when the thickness is less than 0.7nm, the Si3N4 interfacial phase in TiSiN nanocomposite films may have the same structure as that in TiNSi3N4 multilayers. The strengthening mechanism of TiSiN nanocomposite films may be the same as that of TiNSi3N4 nanomultilayers formed by the coherent epitaxial growth of two layers with different moduli.

1.
S.
Veprek
,
S.
Reiprich
, and
L.
Shizhi
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
66
,
2640
(
1995
).
2.
M.
Diserens
,
J.
Patscheider
, and
F.
Levy
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
120–121
,
158
(
1999
).
3.
M.
Diserens
,
J.
Patscheider
, and
F.
Levy
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
108–109
,
241
(
1998
).
4.
F.
Vaz
,
L.
Rebonta
,
S.
Ramos
,
M. F.
Dasilva
, and
J. C.
Soares
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
108–109
,
236
(
1998
).
5.
S.
Veprek
,
M.
Haussmann
, and
S.
Reiprich
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
14
,
46
(
1996
).
6.
S.
Carvalho
, et al,
Thin Solid Films
398–399
,
391
(
2001
).
7.
M.
Benda
and
J.
Musil
,
Vacuum
55
,
171
(
1999
).
8.
A.
Niederhofer
,
P.
Nesladek
,
H. D.
Mannling
,
K.
Moto
,
S.
Veprek
, and
M.
Jilek
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
120–121
,
173
(
1999
).
9.
Xiaoping
Hu
,
Zenghu
Han
,
Geyabg
Li
, and
Mingyuan
Gu
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
20
,
1921
(
2002
).
10.
S.
Veprek
,
P.
Nesladek
,
A.
Niederhofer
,
F.
Glatz
,
M.
Jilek
, and
M.
Sima
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
108–109
,
138
(
1998
).
11.
F.
Vaz
,
L.
Rebouta L
,
B.
Almeida
,
P.
Goudeau
,
J.
Pacaud
,
J. P.
Rivie're
, and
J. Bessa e
Sousa
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
120–121
,
166
(
1999
).
12.
S.
Christiansen
,
M.
Albrecht
,
H. P.
Strunk
, and
S.
Veprek
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
16
,
19
(
1998
).
13.
S.
Veprek
,
A.
Niederhofer
,
K.
Moto
,
T.
Bolom
,
H.-D.
Mannling
,
P.
Nesladek
,
G.
Dollinger
, and
A.
Bergmaier
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
133–134
,
152
(
2000
).
14.
P.
Nesladek
and
S.
Veprek
,
Phys. Status Solidi A
177
,
53
(
2000
).
15.
S.
Veprek
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
97
,
15
(
1997
).
16.
S.
Veprek
and
S.
Reiprich
,
Thin Solid Films
268
,
64
(
1995
).
17.
S.
Veprek
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
17
,
2401
(
1999
).
18.
J.
Patscheider
,
MRS Bull.
28
,
180
(
2003
).
19.
C.
Kim
,
S. B.
Qadri
,
M. R.
Scanlon
, and
R. C.
Cammarata
,
Thin Solid Films
240
,
52
(
1994
).
20.
J. W.
Tian
,
Z. H.
Han
,
Q. X.
Lai
,
X. J.
Yu
,
G. Y.
Li
, and
M. Y.
Gu
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
176
,
267
(
2004
).
21.
W. C.
Oliver
and
G. M.
Pharr
,
J. Mater. Res.
7
,
1564
(
1992
).
22.
J. S.
Koehler
,
Phys. Rev. B
2
,
547
(
1970
).
23.
X.
Chu
and
S. A.
Barnett
,
J. Appl. Phys.
77
,
4403
(
1995
).
24.
M.
Kato
,
T.
Mori
, and
L. H.
Schwartz
,
Acta Metall.
28
,
285
(
1980
).
25.
P. M.
Andson
and
C.
Li
,
Nanostruct. Mater.
5
,
349
(
1995
).
26.
P. C.
Yashar
and
W. D.
Sproul
,
Vacuum
55
,
179
(
1999
).
You do not currently have access to this content.