This work examines the impact of the wetting ability of a plating electrolyte on the Cu seed layer on copper electroplating performance. The contact angle of the electrolyte on the Cu seed is highly sensitive to additive decomposition in the electrolyte, as well as being sensitive to Cu seed self-annealing. The contact angle of the electrolyte decreases in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG), which forms complexes with chloride ions and is absorbed on the Cu surface during plating. However, the consumption of the additives, particularly that of chloride ions, degrades this adsorption. Additionally, the increase in Cu-seed surface roughness owing to self-annealing also reduces electrolyte wettability, compared to the as-received Cu-seed layer. The poor wettability can be improved with additional rinsing. The x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum demonstrates that the Cu surface was covered with a native cupric-hydroxide layer after rinsing, which was hydrophilic (as in the aqueous-plating bath) and had improved wettability. This study also correlates the contact angle with the trapped defects in the electroplated film, which in turn influence the electrical characteristics of the interconnection. The experimental results show that the poor wettability of the plating electrolyte on the Cu seed significantly influences the fluctuations of the Cu interconnect resistance. This conclusion is valuable in designing Cu damascene processes.

1.
K. Y.
Chou
,
M. J.
Chen
,
C. W.
Liu
, and
B. H.
Lin
,
IEEE Trans. Device and Materials Reliability
2
,
50
(
2002
).
2.
S. P.
Murarka
,
I. V.
Verner
, and
R. J.
Gutmann
,
Copper—Fundamental Mechanisms for Microelectronic Applications
(
Wiley
, New York,
2000
).
3.
M.
Sun
,
M. G.
Pecht
, and
D.
Barbe
,
IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf.
15
,
253
(
2002
).
4.
T. P.
Moffat
,
J. E.
Bonevich
,
W. H.
Huber
,
A.
Stanishevsky
,
D. R.
Kelly
,
G. R.
Stafford
, and
D.
Josell
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
147
,
4524
(
2000
).
5.
S. Y.
Chiu
,
J. M.
Shieh
,
S. C.
Chang
,
K. C.
Lin
,
B. T.
Dai
,
C. F.
Chen
, and
M. S.
Feng
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
18
,
2835
(
2000
).
6.
T. J.
Pricer
,
M. J.
Kushner
, and
R. C.
Alkire
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
149
,
C406
(
2002
).
7.
M.
Hayase
,
M.
Taketani
,
K.
Aizawa
,
T.
Hatsuzawa
, and
K.
Hayabusa
,
Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.
5
,
C98
(
2002
).
8.
M.
Kang
,
M. E.
Gross
, and
A. A.
Gewirth
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
150
,
C292
(
2003
).
9.
M.
Hayase
,
M.
Taketani
,
T.
Hatsuzawa
, and
K.
Hayabusa
,
Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.
6
,
C92
(
2003
).
10.
M.
Kang
and
A. A.
Gewirth
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
150
,
C426
(
2003
).
11.
S.
Gandikota
,
D.
Padhi
,
S.
Ramanathan
,
C
McGuirk
,
R.
Emami
,
S.
Parikh
,
G.
Dixit
, and
R.
Cheung
,
Proc. of Int. Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC)
, (
2002
), p.
197
.
12.
S. C.
Chang
,
J. M.
Shieh
,
B. T.
Dai
,
M. S.
Feng
, and
Y. H.
Li
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
149
,
G535
(
2002
).
13.
J.
Reid
,
C.
Gack
, and
S. J.
Hearne
,
Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.
6
,
C29
(
2003
).
14.
W. C.
Tsai
,
C. C.
Wan
, and
Y. Y.
Wang
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
150
,
C267
(
2003
).
15.
E. K.
Broadbent
,
E. J.
Mclnerney
,
L. A.
Gochberg
, and
R. L.
Jackson
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
17
,
2584
(
1999
).
16.
C.
Lingk
and
M. E.
Gross
,
J. Appl. Phys.
84
,
5547
(
1998
).
17.
Q. T.
Jiang
and
M. E.
Thomas
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
19
,
762
(
2001
).
18.
A. S. W.
Wong
,
R. G.
Krishnan
, and
G.
Sarkar
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
18
,
1619
(
2000
).
You do not currently have access to this content.