Previous results on the GaAs:native oxide interface are reviewed and their implications to present attempts at GaAs passivation are discussed. Large band gap semiconductors and the use of sulfur and Sb termination as a means to passivate the surface are discussed. Although sulfur treatments do not lead to ideal (flatband) electrical termination, this treatment exhibits greatly reduced surface recombination. Sb gives an ideal termination which results in the surface Fermi level close to the flatband condition. Both of these treatments have failed as practical passivating processes because they have insufficient chemical stability against the atmosphere. A new methodology for passivating compound semiconductors is presented in which two overlayers are used. In this approach, the first overlayer defines the surface electrically and the second provides long term protection.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 1993
39th National Symposium of the American Vacuum Society
9−13 Nov 1992
Chicago, Illinois (USA)
Research Article|
July 01 1993
Do we need a new methodology for GaAs passivation?
A. M. Green;
A. M. Green
Stanford Electronics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
W. E. Spicer
W. E. Spicer
Stanford Electronics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 11, 1061–1069 (1993)
Article history
Received:
December 15 1992
Accepted:
April 05 1993
Citation
A. M. Green, W. E. Spicer; Do we need a new methodology for GaAs passivation?. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1 July 1993; 11 (4): 1061–1069. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.578442
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00