The temperature distribution in an azimuthally symmetric chemical‐vapor‐deposition reactor is calculated at two pressure regimes. Taken into account is the influence of a silicon wafer situated above a uniformly heated susceptor. In the low‐pressure regime, where the mean free path in the gas phase is much greater than the separation between the wafer and susceptor, the wafer is heated solely by radiation. The temperature at the wafer surface can be ∼20% lower than the susceptor temperature and the temperature drop is nearly independent of the thermal conductivity of the surrounding gas. In the high‐pressure regime, where continuum flow exists between the susceptor and the wafer, the later is heated by conduction, convection, and radiation. The temperature at the wafer surface can be ∼10% lower than that of the susceptor and the temperature drop is strongly influenced by the distance separating the wafer and the susceptor, and by the thermal conductivity of the gas. In both pressure regimes, nonuniform temperature profiles develop at the wafer surface and in the gas phase directly above the wafer. In the reactor geometry studied, a nonuniform susceptor temperature profile would be required to produce uniform wafer and gas‐phase temperature profiles.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 1992
Research Article|
September 01 1992
Temperature distribution in an ideal azimuthally symmetric chemical‐vapor‐deposition reactor
David E. Kotecki;
David E. Kotecki
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center, Hopewell Junction, New York 12533
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard A. Conti
Richard A. Conti
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center, Hopewell Junction, New York 12533
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 3136–3142 (1992)
Article history
Received:
October 15 1991
Accepted:
May 16 1992
Citation
David E. Kotecki, Richard A. Conti; Temperature distribution in an ideal azimuthally symmetric chemical‐vapor‐deposition reactor. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1 September 1992; 10 (5): 3136–3142. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.577877
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Related Content
Miniseptor—A Modular Approach to Susceptor Design
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. (November 1971)
Temperature optimization in an azimuthally symmetric single‐wafer chemical vapor deposition reactor: The low pressure regime
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A (July 1992)
Susceptor and proximity rapid thermal annealing of carbon‐implanted InP
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B (November 1990)
Computational and experimental study of microwave processing of susceptor with multipletopologies of launcher waveguide
AIP Conference Proceedings (May 2022)
Susceptor assisted microwave annealing for recrystallization and dopant activation of arsenic-implanted silicon
J. Appl. Phys. (August 2011)