The mirror fusion test facility (MFTF) vacuum vessel will be about 60 m long and 10 m in diameter at the widest point. The allowable operating densities range from 2×109 to 5×1010 particles per cm3. The maximum leak rate of 10−6 Torrπl/s is dominated during operation by the deliberately injected cold gas of 250 Torrπl/s. This gas is pumped by over 1000 m2 of cryopanels, external sorbtion pumps, and getters. The design and requirements have changed radically over the past several years, and they are still not in final form. The vacuum system design has also changed, but more slowly and less radically. This paper discusses the engineering effort necessary to meet these stringent and changing requirements. Much of the analysis of the internal systems has been carried out using a three‐dimensional Monte Carlo computer code, which can estimate time‐dependent operational pressures. This code and its use will also be described.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 1983
Research Article|
April 01 1983
The (changing) MFTF vacuum environment Available to Purchase
David Margolies;
David Margolies
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, California 94550
Search for other works by this author on:
Lawrence Valby
Lawrence Valby
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, California 94550
Search for other works by this author on:
David Margolies
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, California 94550
Lawrence Valby
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, California 94550
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1, 1308–1314 (1983)
Article history
Received:
August 24 1982
Accepted:
December 17 1982
Citation
David Margolies, Lawrence Valby; The (changing) MFTF vacuum environment. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1 April 1983; 1 (2): 1308–1314. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.572096
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
What more can be done with XPS? Highly informative but underused approaches to XPS data collection and analysis
Donald R. Baer, Merve Taner Camci, et al.
Low-resistivity molybdenum obtained by atomic layer deposition
Kees van der Zouw, Bernhard Y. van der Wel, et al.
Perspective on improving the quality of surface and material data analysis in the scientific literature with a focus on x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
George H. Major, Joshua W. Pinder, et al.
Related Content
The leak‐checking and testing of the first yin–yang magnet for the Mirror Fusion Test Facility (MFTF)
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (April 1983)
A tandem mirror in place at MFTF
Physics Today (September 1981)
Diagnostic control, data acquisition, and data processing at MFTF‐B (invited)
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (August 1986)
The design, construction, and testing of the vacuum vessel for the tandem Mirror Fusion Test Facility
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (May 1986)
Plasma modeling of MFTF‐B and the sensitivity to vacuum conditions
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (May 1985)