Metabolic stable isotope incorporation and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) depth profiling performed on a Cameca NanoSIMS 50 were used to image the 18O-cholesterol and 15N-sphingolipid distributions within a portion of a Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell. Three-dimensional representations of the component-specific isotope distributions show clearly defined regions of 18O-cholesterol and 15N-sphingolipid enrichment that seem to be separate subcellular compartments. The low levels of nitrogen-containing secondary ions detected at the 18O-enriched regions suggest that these 18O-cholesterol-rich structures may be lipid droplets, which have a core consisting of cholesterol esters and triacylglycerides.

Lipids and cholesterol comprise cellular membranes and also play important roles in signal transduction1,2 and intracellular trafficking.3,4 Alterations in the distributions of various lipid species within subcellular compartments are linked to a variety of pathologies, the most well-known being Niemann-Pick disease.5 Direct imaging of the lipid and cholesterol compositions of various subcellular compartments without the use of fluorophores that may alter organization and intracellular trafficking6 would provide a valuable alternative perspective on native cell structure, and ultimately, function. Furthermore, three-dimensional imaging would enable organelles and intracellular processes to be resolved.

We previously used high resolution secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), which we performed with a Cameca NanoSIMS 50, to image the distributions of cholesterol and sphingolipids on the surfaces of fibroblast cells.7–9 For analyses performed on this instrument, a focused cesium or oxygen primary ion beam is scanned over the sample. Monoatomic and diatomic secondary ions with up to five different mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) are collected in parallel at every pixel, producing images of the elemental or isotopic composition at the surface of the sample with a lateral resolution as good as 50 nm.10,11 In our approach, distinct stable isotopes that encode for component identity are selectively incorporated into the lipid species of interest with established metabolic labeling techniques.12 Then, the component-specific isotope enrichment in the membrane cell is imaged with approximately 90 nm lateral resolution with a Cameca NanoSIMS 50 instrument. Use of this approach to visualize metabolically incorporated 18O-cholesterol and 15N-sphingolipids on the surfaces of fibroblast cells revealed the plasma membrane contained a fairly uniform cholesterol distribution and micrometer-scale 15N-sphingolipid patches.7 By imaging the effects of drugs on the sphingolipid distribution, we determined the sphingolipids were confined within domains by the cytoskeleton and its associated proteins.7,8

Having identified the cholesterol and sphingolipid distribution within the plasma membrane, we have now turned our focus to investigating their intracellular distributions, including their abundances within intracellular membranes. The compositions of intracellular membranes have been previously assessed by lysing populations of cells, separating the organelles with centrifugation, and then analyzing the lipid composition in each fraction by biochemical assays or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).13,14 A pitfall of this approach is that the measured cholesterol levels depend on the method used to fractionate the cells, likely due to contamination with membranes from other organelles and spontaneous cholesterol transfer between membranes after cell disruption.15 SIMS is an attractive alternative approach for probing the distributions of lipids and metabolites within intact cells. A thin layer of material is sputtered from the sample each time the primary ion beam interrogates its surface, allowing a series of images to be acquired at progressively increasing depth below the cell surface by successively reimaging the same location multiple times. Sputtering scans that remove more material from the sample's surface are often inserted between the imaging scans to reduce the analysis time required to depth profile through the cells.16,17 Both NanoSIMS instruments and new time-of-flight SIMS (ToF-SIMS) instruments that do not need distinct labels for component identification have been used to image the intracellular distributions of nucleotides, lipids, amino acids, nanoparticles, and elements of interest.18–24 However, the intracellular distributions of cholesterol and sphingolipids have not been imaged in parallel and with submicrometer lateral resolution.

As a first step toward assessing the abundances of sphingolipids and cholesterol within the membranes of distinct organelles, here we use high-resolution SIMS, performed with a Cameca NanoSIMS 50, to directly image the cholesterol and sphingolipid distribution within a portion of a Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell.

MDCK cells were obtained from ATCC (CCL-34) and adapted over multiple passages to grow in UltraMDCK serum-free medium (Lonza) supplemented with 104 units/ml penicillin G, and 10 mg/ml streptomycin. Fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA), 13C18-stearic acid (99 at. % carbon-13), and other cell culture materials were obtained from Sigma. Poly-l-lysine and chemical preservation reagents were obtained from Electron Microscopy Sciences. Silicon wafer chips were obtained from Ted Pella, Inc. Uniformly carbon-13 labeled (98 at. %) fatty acids were obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. Reported methods were used to synthesize the 15N-sphingolipid precursors, 15N-sphingosine, and 15N-sphinganine from 15N-serine (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories).25–2718O-cholesterol was synthesized from i-cholesteryl methyl ether (Sigma) and 18O-water (Olinax, Inc.) as reported.28 

MDCK cells were cultured in UltraMDCK serum-free medium supplemented with 3 μM 15N-sphingolipid precursors at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Each subsequent day, cell medium was aspirated and fresh applied with added 15N-sphingolipid precursors. On day 3, cells were passaged in serum-free growth medium supplemented with 3 μM 15N-sphingolipid precursors, 215 μM 13C-fatty acids (4:1:28 mass ratio of UL-13C fatty acids/13C-stearic acid/fatty acid free bovine BSA), and 50 μM 18O-cholesterol (2:5 mass ratio of 18O-cholesterol:fatty acid-free BSA). Each subsequent day, the medium was aspirated and replaced with fresh medium containing 15N-sphingolipid precursors, 13C-fatty acids, and 18O-cholestrol at the aforementioned concentration. On day 6, cells were passaged into dishes containing poly-l-lysine–coated 5 × 5-mm silicon wafer substrates. The following day, substrates were preserved with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide as described.7,12 Incorporations of nitrogen-15 and oxygen-18 into the sphingolipids and cholesterol, respectively, were assessed using cells attached to the culture dish as previously reported.7,12

Prior to SIMS analysis, samples were imaged on a JEOL 7000F analytical scanning electron microscope at 1 keV and a working distance of 10 mm. The samples were then coated with 3 nm of iridium (99.95%) with a Cressington 208HR high-resolution sputter coater equipped with a MTM-20 thickness controller. SIMS was performed on a Cameca NanoSIMS 50 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The 16O, 18O, 12C14N, 12C15N, and 32S secondary ions, and secondary electrons were collected simultaneously. Cell membrane imaging was performed with a 0.17-pA, 16-keV 133Cs+ primary ion beam, where 12 replicate scans of 512 × 512 pixels with a dwell time of 0.5 ms/pixel were acquired for a 15 × 15-μm analysis region. Depth profiling was performed with a 1.137-pA, 16-keV 133Cs+ primary ion beam. Approximately 1620 replicate scans of 512 × 512 pixels with dwell time of 0.5 ms/pixel were acquired of a 10 × 10-μm region.

limage software (L. R. Nittler, Carnegie Institution of Washington) run on the PV-Wave platform (Visual Numerics, Inc.) was used to generate isotope enrichment images. The isotope enrichment is the 12C15N/12C14N or 18O/16O ratio divided by their terrestrial standard abundance ratio (0.00367 and 0.002005, respectively). Enrichment images showing the 15N-sphingolipid and 18O-cholesterol distributions and 12C14N ion images were constructed using a 5 × 5 pixel moving average smoothing algorithm.

Compared to the depth profiling experiments, cell membrane imaging was performed with a lower dose of primary ions, so fewer secondary ions were detected at each pixel. Because ratioing to small numbers may amplify random signal fluctuations, the pixels where the counts of the naturally abundant ion were below a threshold value were masked so that they appear black in the isotope enrichment images of the plasma membrane. For the 15N-enrichment images, the masking threshold was set to four counts of 12C14N ions/pixel, which is 5% of the maximum 12C14N counts/pixel detected on the surface of the cell. For the 18O-enrichment images, a masking threshold of 5% of the maximum 16O counts/pixel detected on the cell surface, which is one 16O count/pixel, was insufficient to remove the pixel-to-pixel variation in 18O-enrichment that is characteristic of random variations in signal intensity. Therefore, a masking threshold of two 16O counts/pixel, which is 10% of the maximum 16O counts/pixel detected on the cell, was applied to the 18O-enrichment images of the plasma membrane. Masking thresholds were not applied to the depth profiling images because significantly more secondary ions were detected at each pixel.

Three-dimensional (3D) representations of the 15N-sphingolipids and 18O-cholesterol within the cell were constructed by stacking subsequent images using the built-in 3D viewer imagej plugin run in imagej.29 Each image in the stack was manually aligned in the x- and y-directions to correct for sample and stage drift during the depth profiling experiment. A transparency of 50% was applied to the stack for better visualization.

The approximate depth where each image was acquired was calculated from our raster area, primary ion beam current, and the average sputtering rate measured on other biological samples, as described.19 Sputtering rate was assumed to be constant at all positions in the sample. Differences between the rate of sputtering on these MDCK cells and the other biological samples, and potential changes in sputter rate caused by differences in chemical composition within the cell would reduce the accuracy of the estimated analysis depths and 3D renderings presented herein.

The distinct stable isotopes, nitrogen-15 and oxygen-18, were metabolically incorporated into MDCK cells as previously described.7,12 The cells were imaged with SEM under low-kilo-volt to identify well-preserved specimens for analysis with high-resolution SIMS. Figure 1 shows the whole, fixed MDCK cell, where the yellow outline indicates the approximate region that was analyzed with SIMS. No cracks or other blemishes are visible on the cell surface, indicating this cell was well-preserved.

Fig. 1.

SEM image of a MDCK cell. The approximate location that was depth profiled with high-resolution SIMS is outlined in yellow.

Fig. 1.

SEM image of a MDCK cell. The approximate location that was depth profiled with high-resolution SIMS is outlined in yellow.

Close modal

The cholesterol and sphingolipid distribution in the plasma membrane of the same MDCK cell was iridium coated and imaged with high-resolution SIMS using operating conditions that produced a sputtering depth of ∼3 nm, estimated using the average sputtering rate determined for other biological samples.19 The secondary electron (SE) image that was collected in parallel with the secondary ions [Fig. 2(a)] shows the morphology of the cell. The 18O-enrichment SIMS image [Fig. 2(b)] shows the 18O-cholesterol is relatively uniform within the plasma membrane, except for the dark region at the lower left corner of the image. This region appears dark because the 16O ion counts were insufficient (≤2 counts/pixel) to calculate the 18O-enrichment at this tall region on cell (see Sec. II for details). Large portions of this region also appear dark in the 15N-enrichment image [Fig. 2(c)], which suggests that sample topography interfered with secondary ion collection at this site. Nonetheless, local elevations in 15N-enrichment that represent 15N-sphingolipid domains are visible on the cell [Fig. 2(c)]. The 15N-sphingolipid-enriched features shown in Fig. 2(c) do not correlate with projections or other distinct structures on the cell [Fig. 2(b)], indicating they are not artifacts of cell topography. The finding of sphingolipid-enriched domains and a relatively uniform cholesterol distribution is consistent with the 18O-cholesterol and 15N-sphingolipid distributions we previously observed in the plasma membranes of mouse fibroblast cells.7–9 

Fig. 2.

High-resolution SIMS images of the plasma membrane of a MDCK cell. Secondary electron image (a) of the surface of a MDCK cell acquired with the NanoSIMS instrument. The 18O-enrichment image (b) shows the distribution of metabolically incorporated 18O-cholesterol in the plasma membrane of the MDCK cell and on the adjacent substrate. The image appears black at the regions where the counts of 16O ions were below the threshold (2 counts/pixel) required to calculate the 18O-enrichment (lower left corner of the image). This primarily occurred at the tallest features within the analyzed region. The 15N-enrichment image (c) shows the distribution of metabolically labeled 15N-sphingolipids in the plasma membrane. The image is black at the pixels where the 12C14N ion counts were too low to calculate the 15N-enrichment (four 12C14N counts/pixel, see Sec. II for details).

Fig. 2.

High-resolution SIMS images of the plasma membrane of a MDCK cell. Secondary electron image (a) of the surface of a MDCK cell acquired with the NanoSIMS instrument. The 18O-enrichment image (b) shows the distribution of metabolically incorporated 18O-cholesterol in the plasma membrane of the MDCK cell and on the adjacent substrate. The image appears black at the regions where the counts of 16O ions were below the threshold (2 counts/pixel) required to calculate the 18O-enrichment (lower left corner of the image). This primarily occurred at the tallest features within the analyzed region. The 15N-enrichment image (c) shows the distribution of metabolically labeled 15N-sphingolipids in the plasma membrane. The image is black at the pixels where the 12C14N ion counts were too low to calculate the 15N-enrichment (four 12C14N counts/pixel, see Sec. II for details).

Close modal

The cholesterol and sphingolipid distributions within the MDCK cell were imaged after changing our analysis conditions to more rapidly sputter through the cell. Figure 3 shows the secondary electron, 18O-enrichment, 15N-enrichment, and 12C14N secondary ion images that were acquired during the depth profiling analysis, revealing changes in cell morphology and composition with increasing depth from the cell's surface. Note that the color bars that encode for the isotope enrichment at each pixel in Fig. 3 have lower maxima than those shown in Fig. 2. Each of the images shown in Fig. 3 was constructed using data from ten raster planes, which is estimated to correspond to a thickness of approximately 37 nm. This estimated thickness was calculated from the analysis conditions and the average sputtering rate measured on other biological samples.19 Although this cell's sputtering rate may differ from that measured on other biological samples or vary with intracellular location, this simple calculation yields a useful approximation of the position of the relatively large intracellular structures that were observed relative to the apical plasma membrane.

Fig. 3.

High-resolution SIMS images acquired at various depths within a MDCK cell. Images (a)–(d) are estimated to have been acquired after sputtering approximately 800 nm of material from the surface of the cell. Images (e)–(h) and (i)–(l) are estimated to have been acquired after sputtering approximately 4 and 6 μm, respectively, into the cell. [(a), (e), and (i)] Secondary electron images show sample topology. [(b), (f), and (j)] 18O-enrichment images reveal regions enriched with metabolically incorporated 18O-cholesterol within the cell. These large cholesterol-rich features begin to appear at an estimated depth of approximately 4 μm from the cell surface. [(c), (g), and (k)] 15N-enrichment images show smaller regions enriched with 15N-sphingolipids within the cell that do not correlate with the 18O-rich regions. [(d), (h), and (l)] The 12C14N secondary ion images show the 12C14N counts were often very low at the 18O-enriched regions, which suggests that they have low nitrogen content.

Fig. 3.

High-resolution SIMS images acquired at various depths within a MDCK cell. Images (a)–(d) are estimated to have been acquired after sputtering approximately 800 nm of material from the surface of the cell. Images (e)–(h) and (i)–(l) are estimated to have been acquired after sputtering approximately 4 and 6 μm, respectively, into the cell. [(a), (e), and (i)] Secondary electron images show sample topology. [(b), (f), and (j)] 18O-enrichment images reveal regions enriched with metabolically incorporated 18O-cholesterol within the cell. These large cholesterol-rich features begin to appear at an estimated depth of approximately 4 μm from the cell surface. [(c), (g), and (k)] 15N-enrichment images show smaller regions enriched with 15N-sphingolipids within the cell that do not correlate with the 18O-rich regions. [(d), (h), and (l)] The 12C14N secondary ion images show the 12C14N counts were often very low at the 18O-enriched regions, which suggests that they have low nitrogen content.

Close modal

Figures 3(a)–3(d) display the secondary electron, 18O-enrichment, and 15N-enrichment, and 12C14N secondary ion images that show sample morphology, 18O-cholesterol distribution, 15N-sphingolipid distribution, and 12C14N counts, respectively, at a calculated depth of approximately 780 nm below the apical plasma membrane. Within this region, the 18O-distribution is fairly uniform, except for the 18O-enriched region at the edge of the cell. Comparison to the secondary electron image [Fig. 3(a)] indicates the cell was very thin at this 18O-enriched region. Therefore, this region is likely 18O-enriched because 18O-cholesterol in the plasma membrane at the bottom of the cell was detected. In contrast, ∼0.5–2 μm regions enriched with 15N-sphingolipids are visible on the thicker regions of the cell [Fig. 3(c)]. These sphingolipid-rich regions do not correlate to the 15N-sphingolipid domains within the plasma membrane [Fig. 2(c)]. These features may be membrane-bound structures that contain sphingolipids in their lumens, or the sphingolipids may be confined to their membranes but our lateral resolution was insufficient to resolve their lumens.

At an estimated sputtering depth of approximately 4 μm, much of the thin layer of material at the edge of the cell has been eroded away [Fig. 3(e)]. Features enriched with 18O-cholesterol become visible at this depth [Fig. 3(f)], whereas the 15N-sphingolipid-rich features are less abundant [Fig. 3(g)]. The average 18O-enrichment in these features is nearly four times lower than that of the overlaying plasma membrane. This suggests that cholesterol is present at higher abundance in the plasma membrane than in intracellular structures, which is consistent with literature reports.30 The 18O-enriched features change with increasing depth. At an estimated depth of approximately 6 μm, a significant amount of erosion is visible [Fig. 3(i)]. Figure 3(j) shows that more 18O-cholesterol-rich features are visible at approximately 6 μm from the cell's upper surface. Very few regions enriched in 15N-sphingolipids are visible at this depth [Fig. 3(k)], and those that are present are not colocalized with the 18O-rich regions. As shown in Figs. 3(g) and 3(k), 15N-sphingolipids appear to be deficient in many regions that are enriched with 18O-cholesterol. Interestingly, the 12C14N secondary ion counts are also lower at the sites enriched with 18O-cholesterol [Figs. 3(h) and 3(l)], which suggests that they contain low levels of nitrogen.

3D visualization of a region that was estimated to span from approximately 3.7–6 μm below the cell surface was performed by stacking individual images acquired at the same sample location. Each layer was manually aligned with the previous image to correct for drift in the location of the analysis region, which produces an image stack that is uneven along its z-axis. Distinct cholesterol-rich features are clearly apparent [Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)]. Some of these features span the entire depth of this analysis, which was calculated to be approximately 2.3 μm, and no decrease in their 18O-enrichment is visible. In contrast, the 15N-enriched areas that denote the presence of 15N-sphingolipids are smaller than the 18O-enriched regions [Figs. 4(c) and 4(d)]. Little colocalization was observed between the 18O-rich regions and the 15N-rich sites. The low counts of 12C14N detected at the 18O-enriched features [Figs. 3(h), 3(l)] may suggest that they are lipid droplets.31 Lipid droplets are cellular organelles that contain abundant triglycerides and sterol esters,32,33 which do not contain nitrogen. Lipid droplets range in size from 0.1 to 5 μm,34 which is consistent with the sizes of the 18O-enriched features we observed. However, further studies are required to confirm the identity of these 18O-enriched intracellular structures.

Fig. 4.

Three-dimensional renderings of the 18O-cholesterol and 15N-sphingolipid distributions in an approximately 2.3 μm-thick region in a MDCK cell were created by stacking 61 isotope enrichment images that were acquired over 24 h. Each of the 61 images in the stack consists of data from ten raster planes. These images were aligned to correct for the sample and stage drift that occurred during the experiment, and a transparency of 50% was applied for better visualization. The 3D renderings were not adjusted to compensate for surface topography or potential changes in the sputter rate within the cell. The first and last images in each stack are estimated to have been acquired at approximately 3.7 and 6 μm, respectively, below the cell surface. Side (a) and top (b) view of the 3D rendering of the 18O-enrichment shows 18O-cholesterol is concentrated in tubular projections that span the analysis depth. A combination of image alignment for drift correction and the 50% transparency gives the appearance of curvature along the z-axis [top left of (a) and bottom left of (b)]. Side (c) and top (d) view of the 3D distribution of 15N-enrichment shows smaller pockets of 15N-sphingolipids that do not correlate with the 18O-rich regions.

Fig. 4.

Three-dimensional renderings of the 18O-cholesterol and 15N-sphingolipid distributions in an approximately 2.3 μm-thick region in a MDCK cell were created by stacking 61 isotope enrichment images that were acquired over 24 h. Each of the 61 images in the stack consists of data from ten raster planes. These images were aligned to correct for the sample and stage drift that occurred during the experiment, and a transparency of 50% was applied for better visualization. The 3D renderings were not adjusted to compensate for surface topography or potential changes in the sputter rate within the cell. The first and last images in each stack are estimated to have been acquired at approximately 3.7 and 6 μm, respectively, below the cell surface. Side (a) and top (b) view of the 3D rendering of the 18O-enrichment shows 18O-cholesterol is concentrated in tubular projections that span the analysis depth. A combination of image alignment for drift correction and the 50% transparency gives the appearance of curvature along the z-axis [top left of (a) and bottom left of (b)]. Side (c) and top (d) view of the 3D distribution of 15N-enrichment shows smaller pockets of 15N-sphingolipids that do not correlate with the 18O-rich regions.

Close modal

The distribution of cholesterol between the plasma membrane and intracellular compartments is tightly controlled.30,35 The abundance of cholesterol in intracellular organelles has been linked to the membrane's biophysical properties,36 and a variety of cellular processes, including signal transduction1,2 and membrane trafficking.3,4 Previous studies have employed fluorescent cholesterol analogs,37 fractionation procedures to separate cellular components of interest coupled with appropriate assays,38 and immunolabeling of cryosections of whole cells39 to analyze the cholesterol distribution within cells.

3D visualization of the cholesterol content of individual organelles within a single cell could improve our current understanding of cholesterol distribution by providing a fluorophore-free in situ method. Others have tracked 13C-fatty acid storage in lipid droplets within cell cultures and mouse tissue using high-resolution SIMS performed with a Cameca NanoSIMS.31,40,41 A similar study in which 13C-fatty acid incorporation was simultaneously imaged with 18O-cholesterol would be required to more definitively assess whether the 18O-enriched features we observed are lipid droplets. Alternatively, the presence of triacylglyceride and cholesterol esters might be assessed without the need for labels with new ToF-SIMS instruments.

While the relative distribution of cholesterol and sphingolipids within the cell volume can be clearly understood in this study, our estimates of sampling depth may be inaccurate if the sputter rate of this cell differs from that measured on other biological samples, or changes at different locations in the cell. This potential inaccuracy does not undermine the central conclusions of this study, but it would be a problem for a study in which the size of the structures or precise location is a part of the interpretation of the results. Measurements of sample height before and after SIMS analysis would enable more accurate determination of the depths of the observed intracellular structures. Chemical data could be used to account for changes in sputter rate in different structures. Topographic corrections could also help the viewer more readily understand more complex structures. Such corrections warp the image data to follow the surface topography, which can be visualized in the secondary electron images in this study (Fig. 3). Some groups have used AFM to correct the z-axis for sample topography and construct more accurate 3D representations from the 2D data.42–44 At least one z-corrector toolbox has been developed, though it only works with IONTOF files.21 Recently, a Cameca NanoSIMS 50 was combined with high-resolution scanning probe microscopy to allow in situ topographical imaging of the sample surface, which can then be automatically assembled into a 3D representation by an available software program.45 This in situ approach has the advantage of being able to correct for any differences in sputter rate across the sample surface, which might occur when a region with a different chemical composition, such as a lipid droplet, comes to the surface. Such effects could be important if attempting to estimate the size of intercellular features with high precision.

Here we have demonstrated that high-resolution SIMS performed with a Cameca NanoSIMS 50 enables the 3D visualization of submicron-sized features within a single cell. Using this approach, we have observed interesting intracellular features with elevated 18O-cholesterol levels. Future work will focus on confirming the identity of these cholesterol-rich features, and locating specific organelles, such as endosomes, within the cell volume.

This work was partially supported by the U.S. NSF under CHE–1508662 (to M.L.K.), and Lab Directed Research and Development funding (to LLNL). A portion of this work was carried out in the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities, University of Illinois. The authors thank Kaiyan Lou for the synthesis of the 15N-sphingolipid precursors and 18O-cholesterol. Work at LLNL was supported by Lab Directed Research and Development funding and performed under the auspices of the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344.

1.
N.
Bartke
and
Y. A.
Hannun
,
J. Lipid Res.
50
,
S91
(
2009
).
2.
P.-Y.
Wang
,
J.
Weng
, and
R. G. W.
Anderson
,
Science
307
,
1472
(
2005
).
3.
A. G.
Rosenwald
,
C. E.
Machamer
, and
R. E.
Pagano
,
Biochemistry
31
,
3581
(
1992
).
4.
J.
Lippincott-Schwartz
and
R. D.
Phair
,
Annu. Rev. Biophys.
39
,
559
(
2010
).
5.
S. L.
Sturley
,
M. C.
Patterson
,
W.
Balch
, and
L.
Liscum
,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1685
,
83
(
2004
).
6.
M.
Chatelut
,
M.
Leruth
,
K.
Harzer
,
A.
Dagan
,
S.
Marchesini
,
S.
Gatt
,
R.
Salvayre
,
P.
Courtoy
, and
T.
Levade
,
FEBS Lett.
426
,
102
(
1998
).
7.
J. F.
Frisz
,
H. A.
Klitzing
,
K.
Lou
,
I. D.
Hutcheon
,
P. K.
Weber
,
J.
Zimmerberg
, and
M. L.
Kraft
,
J. Biol. Chem.
288
,
16855
(
2013
).
8.
J. F.
Frisz
 et al.,
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
110
,
E613
(
2013
).
9.
R. L.
Wilson
,
J. F.
Frisz
,
H. A.
Klitzing
,
J.
Zimmerberg
,
P. K.
Weber
, and
M. L.
Kraft
,
Biophys. J.
108
,
1652
(
2015
).
10.
S. G.
Boxer
,
M. L.
Kraft
, and
P. K.
Weber
,
Annu. Rev. Biophys.
38
,
53
(
2009
).
11.
M. L.
Kraft
and
H. A.
Klitzing
,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids
1841
,
1108
(
2014
).
12.
H. A.
Klitzing
,
P. K.
Weber
, and
M. L.
Kraft
, “
Secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging of biological membranes at high spatial resolution
,” in
Nanoimaging: Methods and Protocols
, Methods in Molecular Biology, edited by
A. A.
Sousa
and
M. J.
Kruhlak
(
Humana
,
Totowa, New Jersey
,
2013
), Vol.
950
, pp.
483
501
.
13.
K. W.
Gasser
,
J.
DiDomenico
, and
U.
Hopfer
,
Anal. Biochem.
171
,
41
(
1988
).
14.
M. G.
Waugh
,
K. M. E.
Chu
,
E. L.
Clayton
,
S.
Minogue
, and
J. J.
Hsuan
,
J. Lipid Res.
52
,
582
(
2011
).
15.
A.
Frolov
,
J. K.
Woodford
,
E. J.
Murphy
,
J. T.
Billheimer
, and
F.
Schroeder
,
J. Biol. Chem.
271
,
16075
(
1996
).
16.
Y.
Ilin
and
M. L.
Kraft
,
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
31
,
108
(
2015
).
17.
J. S.
Fletcher
,
J. C.
Vickerman
, and
N.
Winograd
,
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
15
,
733
(
2011
).
18.
J. S.
Fletcher
,
N. P.
Lockyer
,
S.
Vaidyanathan
, and
J. C.
Vickerman
,
Anal. Chem.
79
,
2199
(
2007
).
19.
S.
Ghosal
,
S. J.
Fallon
,
T. J.
Leighton
,
K. E.
Wheeler
,
M. J.
Kristo
,
I. D.
Hutcheon
, and
P. K.
Weber
,
Anal. Chem.
80
,
5986
(
2008
).
20.
J.
Brison
,
M. A.
Robinson
,
D. S. W.
Benoit
,
S.
Muramoto
,
P. S.
Stayton
, and
D. G.
Castner
,
Anal. Chem.
85
,
10869
(
2013
).
21.
M. A.
Robinson
,
D. J.
Graham
, and
D. G.
Castner
,
Anal. Chem.
84
,
4880
(
2012
).
22.
D.
Breitenstein
,
C. E.
Rommel
,
R.
Möllers
,
J.
Wegener
, and
B.
Hagenhoff
,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
46
,
5332
(
2007
).
23.
J. S.
Fletcher
,
S.
Rabbani
,
A.
Henderson
,
N. P.
Lockyer
, and
J. C.
Vickerman
,
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
25
,
925
(
2011
).
24.
D. J.
Graham
,
J. T.
Wilson
,
J. J.
Lai
,
P. S.
Stayton
, and
D. G.
Castner
,
Biointerphases
11
,
02A304
(
2016
).
25.
P.
Garner
,
J. M.
Park
, and
E.
Malecki
,
J. Org. Chem.
53
,
4395
(
1988
).
26.
A.
Dondoni
and
D.
Perrone
,
Org. Synth.
77
,
64
(
2000
).
27.
C.
Peters
,
A.
Billich
,
M.
Ghobrial
,
K.
Hoegenauer
,
T.
Ullrich
, and
P.
Nussbaumer
,
J. Org. Chem.
72
,
1842
(
2007
).
28.
H.
McKennis
,
J. Biol. Chem.
172
,
313
(
1948
); available at http://www.jbc.org/content/172/1/313.short.
29.
B.
Schmid
,
J.
Schindelin
,
A.
Cardona
,
M.
Longair
, and
M.
Heisenberg
,
BMC Bioinf.
11
,
274
(
2010
).
30.
E.
Ikonen
,
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
9
,
125
(
2008
).
31.
M. L.
Steinhauser
,
A. P.
Bailey
,
S. E.
Senyo
,
C.
Guillermier
,
T. S.
Perlstein
,
A. P.
Gould
,
R. T.
Lee
, and
C. P.
Lechene
,
Nature
481
,
516
(
2012
).
32.
T. C.
Walther
and
R. V.
Farese
,
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
81
,
687
(
2012
).
33.
A.
Penno
,
G.
Hackenbroich
, and
C.
Thiele
,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1831
,
589
(
2013
).
34.
T.
Fujimoto
and
R. G.
Parton
,
Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol.
3
,
a004838
(
2011
).
35.
B.
Mesmin
and
F. R.
Maxfield
,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1791
,
636
(
2009
).
37.
S.
Mukherjee
,
X.
Zha
,
I.
Tabas
, and
F. R.
Maxfield
,
Biophys. J.
75
,
1915
(
1998
).
38.
Y.
Lange
,
M. H.
Swaisgood
,
B. V.
Ramos
, and
T. L.
Steck
,
J. Biol. Chem.
264
,
3786
(
1989
); available at http://www.jbc.org/content/264/7/3786.abstract.
39.
W.
Möbius
,
E.
van Donselaar
,
Y.
Ohno-Iwashita
,
Y.
Shimada
,
H. F. G.
Heijnen
,
J. W.
Slot
, and
H. J.
Geuze
,
Traffic (Copenhagen, Den.)
4
,
222
(
2003
).
40.
A. M.
Kleinfeld
,
J. P.
Kampf
, and
C.
Lechene
,
J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.
15
,
1572
(
2004
).
41.
H.
Jiang
,
C. N.
Goulbourne
,
A.
Tatar
,
K.
Turlo
,
D.
Wu
,
A. P.
Beigneux
,
C. R. M.
Grovenor
,
L. G.
Fong
, and
S. G.
Young
,
J. Lipid Res.
55
,
2156
(
2014
).
42.
M. L.
Wagter
,
A. H.
Clarke
,
K. F.
Taylor
,
P. A. W.
van der Heide
, and
N. S.
McIntyre
,
Surf. Interface Anal.
25
,
788
(
1997
).
43.
A.
Wucher
,
J.
Cheng
, and
N.
Winograd
,
Anal. Chem.
79
,
5529
(
2007
).
44.
A.
Wucher
,
J.
Cheng
,
L.
Zheng
,
D.
Willingham
, and
N.
Winograd
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
255
,
984
(
2008
).
45.
T.
Wirtz
,
Y.
Fleming
,
U.
Gysin
,
T.
Glatzel
,
U.
Wegmann
,
E.
Meyer
,
U.
Maier
, and
J.
Rychen
,
Surf. Interface Anal.
45
,
513
(
2013
).