Sonic cohabitation between port areas and the communities living nearby is a major concern for many cities worldwide. To manage port noise, city governments, port authorities, and even academic researchers, have formulated various strategies at different scales. Most of these strategies have been published in a variety of formats (e.g., academic articles, acoustic reports, governance guidelines), and to our knowledge, have never been compiled and reviewed. The present paper is a review of available documentation and literature to identify trends and practices in port noise management. A Web of Science search and additional reference list checks yielded a total of 138 documents, out of which we identified 102 documents for full review. We found that three main types of strategies are suggested or implemented, namely (1) technical solutions (e.g., noise barriers), (2) design and planning considerations (e.g., traffic calming, buffer zones), and (3) multi-faceted strategies (e.g., interdisciplinary expertise). Few of the suggested or implemented strategies to mitigate noise port are evaluated after implementation. Nearly all of the evaluations rely on acoustic measurements and overlook resident experiences.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
18 November 2024
187th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America
18–22 November 2024
Virtual Meeting 2024
Noise: Paper 1aNS6
March 19 2025
A review of port noise management strategies
Negar Imani;
Negar Imani
1
McGill University School of Information Studies and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
, Montreal, Québec, H3A 1X1, CANADA
; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Cynthia Tarlao;
Cynthia Tarlao
2
McGill University School of Information Studies and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
, Montreal, Québec, H3A 1X1, CANADA
; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Catherine Guastavino
Catherine Guastavino
3
McGill University School of Information Studies and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
, Montreal, Québec, H3A 1X1, CANADA
; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Negar Imani
1
Cynthia Tarlao
2
Catherine Guastavino
3
1
McGill University School of Information Studies and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
, Montreal, Québec, H3A 1X1, CANADA
; [email protected]
2
McGill University School of Information Studies and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
, Montreal, Québec, H3A 1X1, CANADA
; [email protected]
3
McGill University School of Information Studies and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
, Montreal, Québec, H3A 1X1, CANADA
; [email protected]Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 55, 040002 (2024)
Article history
Received:
December 16 2024
Accepted:
February 18 2025
Connected Content
This is a companion to:
A review of port noise management strategies to improve sonic cohabitation
Citation
Negar Imani, Cynthia Tarlao, Catherine Guastavino; A review of port noise management strategies. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 18 November 2024; 55 (1): 040002. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0002014
Download citation file:
42
Views
Citing articles via
Impact of design variations of micro-perforated panels on psychoacoustic metrics of transmitted sound
Jiahua Zhang, Laurent De Ryck, et al.
Neural network for geoacoustic inversion of sub-bottom profiler data
Justin Diamond, David Dall'Osto, et al.