In American English, when /t/ and /d/ occur intervocalically, they are realized as a voiced alveolar flap [ɾ] (e.g., [ɹa͡ ɪɾɪŋ] writing/riding, [liɾɚ] liter/leader). Researchers found that there are five main cues for distinguishing the voicing of these intervocalic plosives, preceding vowel duration, following vowel duration, closure duration, semantic context, and f0 perturbation, also known as consonant intrinsic f0. The presence of these cues indicates incomplete neutralization of these forms. To address a current gap in the literature, the present study focused on American English native speakers’ perception and use of CF0 and closure duration as independent and combined informative cues for deciding voicing contrast of /t/ and /d/ when neutralized by the flap. Participants engaged in a self-administered online forced-judgement task of a pseudoword in 30 combinations of CF0 and flap closure duration to indicate the underlying representation (/hɑtɑ/ or /hɑdɑ/) of the surface production [hɑɾɑ] they perceived. This study observed that participants are more likely to select /hɑtɑ/ when the CF0 is higher and /hɑdɑ/ elsewhere. These modest findings suggest that CF0 is a useful cue for voicing distinction. The results suggest that models of spoken word recognition and speech perception ought to include CF0 as a cue.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
13 May 2024
186th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the Canadian Acoustical Association
13–17 May 2024
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Speech Communication: Paper 1pSC1
November 04 2024
Closure duration versus f0 perturbation as a cue to underlying stops for the American English intervocalic flap
Matthew C. Kelley
Matthew C. Kelley
Search for other works by this author on:
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 54, 060005 (2024)
Article history
Received:
September 26 2024
Accepted:
October 21 2024
Connected Content
Citation
Janalyn A. Miklas, Matthew C. Kelley; Closure duration versus f0 perturbation as a cue to underlying stops for the American English intervocalic flap. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 13 May 2024; 54 (1): 060005. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001972
Download citation file:
34
Views
Citing articles via
Flyback sonic booms from Falcon-9 rockets: Measured data and some considerations for future models
Mark C. Anderson, Kent L. Gee, et al.
Related Content
Orthography and second language word learning: Moving beyond “friend or foe?”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2019)
Multi-session training in the evening schedule exhibits enhanced speech learning
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2024)
Prominence effects in vocal iconicity: Implications for lexical access and language change
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2024)
Neural evidence for shared phonetic, phonological, and lexical processing of words and pseudowords
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2013)
Consonant bias in adult lexical processing under acoustically
degraded listening conditions
JASA Express Lett. (May 2023)