Acoustics is central to the study of speech communication, but it is conspicuously under-represented in abstract representations of speech. Many flavors of phonological analysis tend toward articulatory descriptions, and transcriptions focus on strings of articulatory actions. All this is despite acoustics being easier to measure than articulation with current technology. The present study explores basic concepts for an acoustic phonology, with two types of postulated categories: broad and fine. Resonant, turbulent, transient, and occludent types of sounds comprise the broad categories, as general methods of filtering the speech source. Fine categories are conceptualized as specific types of acoustic actions within a broad category. These acoustic actions are goal-oriented, as for achieving a particular acoustic effect like the presence of antiformants or a lowered F2 or F3. However, these actions are not explicitly restricted to manipulating traditional phonetic features like formants. By default, fine categories are assumed to be produced in parallel when possible, yielding overlap effects like anticipatory nasalization, lateralization, and rhotacization. These concepts are exemplified in a microanalysis of contrast between bod, bond, bald, and bard from the speaker in the Massive Auditory Lexical Decision data set, with an eye to seeding the ground for a future acoustic phonology.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
13 May 2024
186th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the Canadian Acoustical Association
13–17 May 2024
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Speech Communication: Paper 5aSC38
June 27 2024
Broad and fine acoustic categories in bod, bond, bald, and bard: A step toward acoustic phonology
Matthew C. Kelley
Matthew C. Kelley
Search for other works by this author on:
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 54, 060001 (2024)
Article history
Received:
May 21 2024
Accepted:
June 05 2024
Citation
Matthew C. Kelley; Broad and fine acoustic categories in bod, bond, bald, and bard: A step toward acoustic phonology. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 13 May 2024; 54 (1): 060001. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001899
Download citation file:
147
Views
Citing articles via
Initial comparison of a Falcon-9 reentry sonic boom with other launch-related noise
Jeffrey Taggart Durrant, Mark C. Anderson, et al.