The vocal folds experience repeated collision during phonation. The resulting contact pressure is often considered to play an important role in vocal fold injury, and has been the focus of many experimental studies. In this study, vocal fold contact pattern and contact pressure during phonation were numerically investigated. The results show that vocal fold contact in general occurs within a horizontal strip on the medial surface, first appearing at the inferior medial surface and propagating upward. Because of the localized and traveling nature of vocal fold contact, sensors of a finite size may significantly underestimate the peak vocal fold contact pressure, particularly for vocal folds of low transverse stiffness. This underestimation also makes it difficult to identify the contact pressure peak in the intraglottal pressure waveform. These results showed that the vocal fold contact pressure reported in previous experimental studies may have significantly underestimated the actual values. It is recommended that contact pressure sensors with a diameter no greater than 0.4 mm are used in future experiments to ensure adequate accuracy in measuring the peak vocal fold contact pressure during phonation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
4 December 2023
185th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America
4–8 December 2023
Sydney, Australia
Speech Communication: Paper 3pSC4
June 04 2024
The influence of sensor size on experimental measurement accuracy of vocal fold contact pressure
Zhaoyan Zhang
Zhaoyan Zhang
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles
, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
; zyzhang@ucla.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 52, 060002 (2023)
Article history
Received:
April 21 2024
Accepted:
May 22 2024
Connected Content
This is a companion to:
Vocal fold contact pattern during phonation and comparison to Hertzian contact theory
Citation
Zhaoyan Zhang; The influence of sensor size on experimental measurement accuracy of vocal fold contact pressure. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 4 December 2023; 52 (1): 060002. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001894
Download citation file:
43
Views
Citing articles via
Initial comparison of a Falcon-9 reentry sonic boom with other launch-related noise
Jeffrey Taggart Durrant, Mark C. Anderson, et al.