High-level impulse noise from small caliber firearms presents a significant risk of noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) for an unprotected ear. The most common method to reduce the level of noise is to provide hearing protection to both the shooter(s) and potential observers such as firing range instructors or interested bystanders. Not all hunters and shooters use hearing protection consistently and correctly. Firearm suppressors provide an engineering noise control that can mitigate a significant portion of the NIHL risk. There is no current industry or ANSI standard for measuring the noise reduction associated with firearm suppressors. In this study, two methods for measuring suppressor attenuation were evaluated. The first method was based on the ANSI/ASA S12.42 standard for measuring impulse peak insertion loss for hearing protection devices and modified for use with firearm suppressors. The second method was based on measuring the difference in the maximum accumulated A-weighted energy for unsuppressed and suppressed firearm impulses. The advantages and disadvantages associated with each method are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
5 December 2022
183rd Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America
5–9 December 2022
Nashville, Tennessee
Noise: Paper 3aNS7
October 20 2023
Can hearing protector attenuation measures for impulsive noise be applied to firearm suppressors?
Stephen M. Tasko
;
Stephen M. Tasko
1
Stephenson and Stephenson Research and Consulting LLC
, 5706 OH-132, Batavia, OH, 45103, USA
; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
William J. Murphy
;
William J. Murphy
1
Stephenson and Stephenson Research and Consulting LLC
, 5706 OH-132, Batavia, OH, 45103, USA
; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Gregory A. Flamme;
Gregory A. Flamme
1
Stephenson and Stephenson Research and Consulting LLC
, 5706 OH-132, Batavia, OH, 45103, USA
; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Kristy K. Deiters;
Kristy K. Deiters
1
Stephenson and Stephenson Research and Consulting LLC
, 5706 OH-132, Batavia, OH, 45103, USA
; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Stewart
Michael Stewart
Search for other works by this author on:
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 50, 040006 (2022)
Article history
Received:
August 15 2023
Accepted:
September 22 2023
Connected Content
This is a companion to:
When is a firearm suppressor like a hearing protector?
Citation
Stephen M. Tasko, William J. Murphy, Gregory A. Flamme, Kristy K. Deiters, Donald S. Finan, Deanna K. Meinke, James E. Lankford, Michael Stewart; Can hearing protector attenuation measures for impulsive noise be applied to firearm suppressors?. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 5 December 2022; 50 (1): 040006. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001793
Download citation file:
131
Views
Citing articles via
Show your scattering coefficients
Michael Vorlaender, Stefan Feistel
Related Content
Developing a method to assess noise reduction of firearm suppressors for small-caliber weapons
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (December 2019)
The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2016)
When is a firearm suppressor like a hearing protector?
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2022)
Developing a method to assess noise reduction of firearm suppressors for small-caliber weapons
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2018)
Summary of “Evaluation of Hearing Protection Devices with Impulse Noise and Acoustic Test Fixtures”
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (August 2024)