NASA’s X-59 Quiet Supersonic Technology aircraft will soon be used to collect data to support the development of a dose-response relationship between low-boom level and human perception. The X-59’s low-boom level will depend on aircraft conditions and trajectory, which can be controlled, and on atmospheric conditions, which cannot be controlled. To assess variability in low-boom levels produced by realistic atmospheres, NASA’s PCBoom code was used to simulate propagation of an X-59 nearfield pressure condition through atmospheric profiles measured during NASA’s Quiet Supersonic Flights 2018 (QSF18) test. Despite QSF18 lasting only 11 days, substantial weather variability occurred including snow and record high temperatures. A PL range of about 8.5 dB was predicted due to the QSF18 atmospheric variability. These results demonstrate the necessity for X-59’s flight condition to be adjusted based on atmospheric conditions in order to achieve desired loudness levels during community surveys. Undertrack booms’ Perceived Levels (PL) were predicted not to exceed 75 dB, X-59’s target level in a standard atmosphere. Attenuation rate, ray tube area, path length and other quantities are presented throughout propagation for the atmospheres that produce the loudest and quietest booms. Humidity differences below 15kft were a primary driver of the PL differences.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
11 December 2020
179th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America
7–11 December 2020
Acoustics Virtually Everywhere
Computational Acoustics: Paper 2aCAa4
August 09 2021
Simulations and case study of X-59 low-booms propagated through measured atmospheric profiles Free
William Jeffrey Doebler
William Jeffrey Doebler
1Structural Acoustics Branch,
NASA Langley Research Center
, Hampton, VA, 23517, USA
; [email protected]1Structural Acoustics Branch,
NASA Langley Research Center
, Hampton, VA, 23517, USA
; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
William Jeffrey Doebler
1,1
1Structural Acoustics Branch,
NASA Langley Research Center
, Hampton, VA, 23517, USA
; [email protected]1Structural Acoustics Branch,
NASA Langley Research Center
, Hampton, VA, 23517, USA
; [email protected]Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 42, 022004 (2020)
Article history
Received:
July 23 2021
Accepted:
July 30 2021
Connected Content
Citation
William Jeffrey Doebler; Simulations and case study of X-59 low-booms propagated through measured atmospheric profiles. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 11 December 2020; 42 (1): 022004. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001448
Download citation file:
509
Views
Citing articles via
Passive hearing abilities of dyslexia children: Investigating the rumble frequency of skull bones cavity
Ibrahim Youssef Noshokaty, Howida Hosny Elgebaly, et al.
Pickleball noise: The physiological and psychological effects on nearby residents
Kathleen M. Romito, Daniel Fink
Related Content
Simulations of X-59 low-booms propagated through measured atmospheric profiles in Galveston, Texas
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Updates to PCBoom sonic boom propagation code: Modeling QSF18 sonic thumps
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2019)
Estimated ambient sonic boom metric levels and X-59 signal-to-noise ratios across the USA
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (April 2021)
Comparison and regression analysis of lateral sonic boom measurements and PCBoom predictions
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2022)
Regression analysis of meteorological, aircraft trajectory, and ambient effects on sonic boom metric variability
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2022)