The exposure at the ear in response to a forward-propagating wave depends upon the angle of incidence at the head, the nominal sound pressure level of the impulse and the attenuation of hearing protection (if worn). The unoccluded and occluded responses of an acoustic test fixture equipped with two G.R.A.S. IEC 60711 couplers ¼-inch microphones were measured in 15° increments for impulses with nominal peak sound pressure levels of 150 and 160 decibels. The attenuation was assessed in a variety of ways: Impulse Peak Insertion Loss (IPIL), change in A-weighted Equivalent Energy, and change in the Auditory Hazard Unit. Generally, the LAeq was quite similar to the (IPIL). However the change in AHUs predicted less attenuation than was actually observed. The lower performance for AHUs may be attributable to the nonlinear hazard growth for the unoccluded ear.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
28 November 2016
172nd Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America
28 November - 2 December 2016
Honolulu, Hawaii
Noise: Paper 3aNS7
March 20 2018
Angle-dependent effects for impulsive noise reduction for hearing protectors Free
William J. Murphy;
William J. Murphy
1
Division of Applied Research and Technology, Hearing Loss Prevention Team, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
, Cincinnati, OH, 45226-1998, USA
; [email protected], [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel Adams;
Daniel Adams
2Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders,
University of Cincinnati
, Cincinnati, OH, USA
; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Pamela S. Graydon
Pamela S. Graydon
1
Division of Applied Research and Technology, Hearing Loss Prevention Team, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
, Cincinnati, OH, 45226-1998, USA
; [email protected], [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
William J. Murphy
1
Daniel Adams
2
Pamela S. Graydon
1
1
Division of Applied Research and Technology, Hearing Loss Prevention Team, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
, Cincinnati, OH, 45226-1998, USA
; [email protected], [email protected]
2
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders,
University of Cincinnati
, Cincinnati, OH, USA
; [email protected]Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 29, 040010 (2016)
Article history
Received:
February 23 2018
Accepted:
March 07 2018
Citation
William J. Murphy, Daniel Adams, Pamela S. Graydon; Angle-dependent effects for impulsive noise reduction for hearing protectors. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 28 November 2016; 29 (1): 040010. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000757
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Pickleball noise: The physiological and psychological effects on nearby residents
Kathleen M. Romito, Daniel Fink
Evaluating a scale model reverberation room for Sound Absorption Coefficient measurements: A cost-effective alternative
Jacques Martell-Villalpando, Alejandro Martínez-Borquez, et al.
Related Content
Angle dependent effects for impulse noise reduction for hearing protectors
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2016)
Evaluation of impulse noise criteria using human volunteer data
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2001)
Uncertainty of hearing protector impulsive attenuation measurements
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2016)
Measuring impulse insertion loss of hearing protection device using high-level impulse noise
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2022)
Comparison of impulse peak insertion loss measured with gunshot and shock tube noise sources
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2014)