Voice stress analyses could be relevant tools to detect deception in many forensic and security contexts. However, today's commercial voice-based lie-detectors are not supported by convincing scientific evidence. In addition to the scientific implausibility of their working principles, the experimental evidence invoked by the sellers is either anecdotal or drawn from methodologically flawed experiments. Nevertheless, criminal investigators, authorities and even some academics appear to be persuaded by the ungrounded claims of the aggressive propaganda from sellers of voice stress analysis gadgets, perhaps further enhanced by the portrays of "cutting-edge voice-analysis technology" in the entertainment industry. Clearly, because there is a serious threat to public justice and security if authorities adopt a naïve "open-minded" attitude towards sham lie-detection devices, this presentation will attempt to draw attention to plausibility and validity issues in connection with the claimed working principles of two commercial voice stress analyzers. The working principles will be discussed from a phonetics and speech analysis perspective and the processes that may lead naïve observers into interpreting as meaningful the spurious results generated by such commercial devices will be examined. Finally, the scope and limitations of using scientific phonetic analyses of voice to detect deception for forensic purposes will be discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
2 June 2013
ICA 2013 Montreal
2–7 June 2013
Montreal, Canada
Speech Communication: Session 1aSCa: Distinguishing Between Science and Pseudoscience in Forensic Acoustics I
May 17 2013
Voice stress analyses: Science and pseudoscience
Francisco Lacerda
Francisco Lacerda
Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden SE-106 91 Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
Francisco Lacerda
Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden SE-106 91 Sweden
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 19, 060003 (2013)
Article history
Received:
January 23 2013
Accepted:
January 28 2013
Citation
Francisco Lacerda; Voice stress analyses: Science and pseudoscience. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 2 June 2013; 19 (1): 060003. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4799435
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Impact of design variations of micro-perforated panels on psychoacoustic metrics of transmitted sound
Jiahua Zhang, Laurent De Ryck, et al.
Neural network for geoacoustic inversion of sub-bottom profiler data
Justin Diamond, David Dall'Osto, et al.
Related Content
A Canadian perspective on forensic science versus pseudoscience
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (May 2013)
Distinguishing between science and pseudoscience in forensic acoustics
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (May 2013)
Assessing acoustic features in the speech of asylum seekers
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (May 2013)
Analysis criteria for forensic musicology
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (May 2013)