Specialized equipment and techniques are required to carry out sound measurements under occluded ears for the purpose of assessing the noise exposure from communication headsets. Standard ISO 11904 describes two procedures: 1) the microphone in a real ear (MIRE) and 2) the acoustic manikin technique using an occluded ear simulator IEC 60318-4. Methods using simpler artificial ears, such as IEC 60318-1, have also been proposed in national occupational noise measurement standards. Such fixtures are more practical to use and more easily accessible. However, they have not been designed specifically for noise measurements under communication headsets and there is little comparative data to the manikin technique, which is considered the gold standard for simulated in-situ acoustic measurements. Fit-refit measurements were obtained under laboratory conditions with four measurement set-ups (artificial ear type 1, type 2, type 3.3, and acoustic manikin), three communication headset types (circum-aural, supra-aural, intra-aural) and six different communication signals. Data was transformed into equivalent-diffuse sound levels using third-octave procedures as well as single number corrections. Overall, results across measurement set-ups are in broad agreement, except for the type 1 artificial ear, but single number corrections reduce measurement accuracy.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
2 June 2013
ICA 2013 Montreal
2–7 June 2013
Montreal, Canada
Noise: Session 5aNSb: Current U.S. and Canadian Noise Standards
May 14 2013
Comparison of direct measurement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace Free
Flora Nassrallah;
Flora Nassrallah
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5 Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Christian Giguere;
Christian Giguere
Audiology/SLP Program, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H8M5 Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Flora Nassrallah
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5 Canada
Christian Giguere
Audiology/SLP Program, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H8M5 Canada
Hilmi R. Dajani
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 19, 040149 (2013)
Article history
Received:
January 22 2013
Accepted:
January 30 2013
Citation
Flora Nassrallah, Christian Giguere, Hilmi R. Dajani; Comparison of direct measurement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 2 June 2013; 19 (1): 040149. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4799979
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Evaluating a scale model reverberation room for Sound Absorption Coefficient measurements: A cost-effective alternative
Jacques Martell-Villalpando, Alejandro Martínez-Borquez, et al.
Pickleball noise: The physiological and psychological effects on nearby residents
Kathleen M. Romito, Daniel Fink
Related Content
Comparison of direct measurement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2013)
An indirect calculation method for estimating occupational sound exposure from communication headsets
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2019)
Validation of the CSA Z107,56 standard method for the measurement of noise exposure from headsets
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (May 2013)
Comparison of the reliability of an Auraldome headset and a standard headset in obtaining pure‐tone audiometric threshold measures
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1976)
Evaluation of a calculation method of noise exposure from communication headsets
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2017)