A simplified model is presented describing acoustic scattering from a toroidal gas bubble in a compressible liquid. It is assumed that the volume oscillations of the bubble are small enough that a linear approximation is appropriate, and furthermore, that the bubble is large enough that the dominant loss mechanism is radiation damping. An expression for the scattering cross section for such a bubble is derived, and the results are compared with finite-element calculations of the full fluid-fluid scattering problem.

This brief communication applies a linear model developed previously1 for acoustic scattering from a gas bubble of arbitrary shape to the specific case of a toroidal bubble. The pulsations are modeled with a harmonic oscillator equation in which the inertia coefficient is due to an expression obtained by Strasberg2 for a bubble of arbitrary shape. The model applies to a bubble that is small compared with a wavelength, but large enough that radiation damping is the dominant loss mechanism. Radiation damping dominates thermal and viscous losses for spherical bubbles with radii larger than 1 cm,3 and for cylindrical bubbles of any radius.4 The model was verified in the previous work1 by comparison with an analytical solution derived by Ye5 for prolate spheroidal bubbles. Verification for toroidal bubbles is provided in the present work by comparison with finite-element calculations.

The primary motivation for the present analysis is the use of tethered arrays of encapsulated bubbles with radii greater than about 5 cm to abate underwater sound at frequencies below about 1 kHz.6 A toroidal shape can facilitate tethering, and the bubble size coincides with the parameter range of the model. It is assumed that the toroidal shell encapsulating the gas is sufficiently compliant that the stiffness coefficient in the model is determined by the gas alone. However, unencapsulated toroidal bubbles are generated by various natural phenomena, such as a vortex ring formed by injection of air from a nozzle7,8 (or from a dolphin's blowhole9), a freely rising gas pocket shaped initially like a spherical cap that transitions to a toroidal shape,10 or due to formation of a liquid jet that pierces through the center of an initially spherical bubble during an asymmetric inertial collapse.11 

Consider a bubble of arbitrary shape, the volume of which at time t is denoted by V(t) and the equilibrium volume by V0. In the linear approximation, the pulsations of the bubble can be modeled using an ordinary differential equation for the excess bubble volume v(t)=V(t)V0. It is assumed that the bubble is driven sinusoidally by a spatially uniform acoustic pressure p(t)=p̃ieiωt. By combining the lumped inertance term derived by Strasberg2 with the radiation damping term derived by Devin,12 the following equation is obtained:1 

(1)

where ρ is the mass density of the surrounding liquid, c is the speed of sound in the liquid, γ is the ratio of specific heats of the gas, and P0 is the ambient pressure. The quantity γP0 is the bulk modulus of the gas, which may be augmented to account for additional stiffness due to a membrane or thin shell encapsulating the bubble. The constant appearing in the effective mass term of Eq. (1) is given by C=v̇/ϕ0, where v̇ is the volume velocity of the bubble and ϕ0 is the velocity potential on the bubble surface.

The value of C is obtained by solving the equations

(2)
(3)

and

(4)

where the integral is taken over the bubble surface with n the outward unit normal vector. Strasberg pointed out that solving for C=v̇/ϕ0 is mathematically equivalent to solving for the electrostatic capacitance of an ideal conductor with the same shape as the bubble. Since this is a classical problem in the field of electrostatics, it has already been solved for a variety of shapes.

In the case of time-harmonic excitation, for which the excess volume takes the form v(t)=ṽeiωt, the solution of Eq. (1) is

(5)

where the undamped natural frequency is given by

(6)

For a spherical bubble with equilibrium radius R0 the capacitance is given by Csph=4πR0 and Eq. (6) coincides with the traditional Minnaert frequency. Since the capacitance of a conductor with a given volume is minimized when its shape is spherical, the inequality C/Csph>1 holds for any nonspherical shape. Therefore, the natural frequency of a nonspherical bubble always exceeds that of a spherical bubble having the same volume.

At frequencies sufficiently low that the bubble is very small compared with a wavelength, for which Eq. (1) applies, the incident wave is scattered omnidirectionally. The scattered pressure in the far field is determined in this limit by treating the bubble as a simple source with volume velocity iωṽ and using the solution in Eq. (5) to obtain

(7)

where k=ω/c is the wavenumber in the liquid. The scattering cross section, defined as the ratio of the scattered power to the intensity of the incident plane wave, is given by σs=4πr2|p̃s/p̃i|2. Based on Eq. (7), the scattering cross section is given explicitly by

(8)

which is valid for a bubble with arbitrary shape. In order to treat the case of a bubble with a specific shape, the appropriate expression for the capacitance C must be substituted in both Eq. (8) and the expression for the natural frequency ω0 given by Eq. (6).

For a torus with major radius b and minor radius a (see Fig. 1), the equilibrium volume is V0=(πa2)(2πb). An overview of the electrostatic properties of a toroidal conductor is provided by Belevitch and Boersma.13 They present a result for the capacitance of a torus in toroidal coordinates, an equivalent form of which is

(9)

where ϵ=b/a1 is the aspect ratio of the torus (with ϵ = 1 corresponding to a “dimpled” sphere, while the torus is thinner for larger ϵ). Pμ and Qμ are Legendre functions of the first and second kind, respectively, of order μ. Legendre functions of half-integer order are sometimes referred to as toroidal functions because of their relationship with problems involving toroidal geometry.

Fig. 1.

Toroidal bubble geometry with major radius b (distance from the center of the torus to the center of its circular cross section) and minor radius a (radius of the circular cross section).

Fig. 1.

Toroidal bubble geometry with major radius b (distance from the center of the torus to the center of its circular cross section) and minor radius a (radius of the circular cross section).

Close modal

Equation (9) is valid for all aspect ratios ϵ1. Thomas14 developed approximate expressions for the capacitance of thin and thick tori, which in the present notation are

(10)
(11)

These two approximations may be substituted into Eq. (6) for the undamped natural frequency to obtain

(12)
(13)

The natural frequency ω0 of a toroidal bubble is shown in Fig. 2, normalized by the natural frequency ωsph of a spherical bubble with the same volume V0. The black curve corresponds to evaluation of Eq. (6) using Eq. (9), the red curve to Eq. (12), and the blue curve to Eq. (13).

Fig. 2.

Undamped natural frequency ω0 of a toroidal bubble, normalized by the undamped natural frequency ωsph of a spherical bubble with equivalent volume, as a function of the aspect ratio b/a1. Solid black curve is based on Eq. (9) for the value of the capacitance C, and dashed curves are based on the approximations in Eqs. (10) and (11).

Fig. 2.

Undamped natural frequency ω0 of a toroidal bubble, normalized by the undamped natural frequency ωsph of a spherical bubble with equivalent volume, as a function of the aspect ratio b/a1. Solid black curve is based on Eq. (9) for the value of the capacitance C, and dashed curves are based on the approximations in Eqs. (10) and (11).

Close modal

The accuracy of approximations (12) and (13) observed in Fig. 2 within their stated ranges of applicability permits insight into how the natural frequency depends on the geometric factors a, b, and V0 individually. For example, if a bubble maintains constant equilibrium volume V0 as the major radius b increases, the minor radius a of the circular cross section is proportional to 1/b, for which the approximations indicate that ω0 increases monotonically with b. If instead a is held constant, the approximations indicate that ω0 decreases monotonically as b increases.

Verification of the results for a toroidal bubble was accomplished by comparing the expression for the scattering cross section in Eq. (8), using Eq. (9) for C, with finite-element calculations for a toroidal air bubble in water.

The solid curves in Fig. 3 were obtained from Eq. (8), normalized by the geometric cross section πR02 of a sphere with equivalent volume, and plotted in dB versus frequency for different aspect ratios b/a. The bubbles have fixed equilibrium volume V0=150 cm3, for which the radius of a spherical bubble is R0=3.3 cm. Values for the aspect ratio of the toroidal bubble vary from b/a=1, for which b=a=1.94 cm, to b/a=10, for which b = 9.03 cm and a = 0.903 cm. The liquid has mass density ρ = 1000 kg/m3 and sound speed c = 1484 m/s, and the gas is adiabatic with ratio of specific heats γ=1.4. The equilibrium pressure is P0=101325 Pa, resulting in a natural frequency of about 100 Hz for the spherical bubble. At 200 Hz, the highest frequency in Fig. 3, and for b = 9.03 cm, the largest value of the major radius, the nominal diameter 2b of the torus is 0.0244λ, and therefore all calculations are for bubbles substantially smaller than the wavelength λ in the liquid.

Fig. 3.

Scattering cross section σs of a toroidal air bubble in water, normalized by the geometric cross section πR02 of a sphere of radius R0 with equivalent volume, as a function of frequency for different aspect ratios b/a1. Solid curves were obtained using Eqs. (8) and (9), and circles were obtained from finite-element calculations.

Fig. 3.

Scattering cross section σs of a toroidal air bubble in water, normalized by the geometric cross section πR02 of a sphere of radius R0 with equivalent volume, as a function of frequency for different aspect ratios b/a1. Solid curves were obtained using Eqs. (8) and (9), and circles were obtained from finite-element calculations.

Close modal

The circles in Fig. 3 were obtained using comsol to perform finite-element calculations for a fluid-fluid acoustic scattering problem with the aforementioned properties of the water and air. The boundary condition in the far field was chosen to be an outwardly propagating spherical wave to simulate an unbounded liquid. The problem was rendered axisymmetric and hence two-dimensional by assuming that the incident plane wave propagates along the symmetry axis of the torus. Figure 3 reveals that the model equations for a toroidal bubble are in excellent agreement with the numerical solutions.

Broadening of the resonance peaks in Fig. 3 with increasing aspect ratio is associated with the increase in bubble surface area, and therefore increase in radiation damping due to the increase in radiation efficiency. This effect may be quantified using the damping constant δ evaluated at the natural frequency as defined by Eller.15 Its value for a bubble of arbitrary shape relative to that for a spherical bubble with equivalent volume can be expressed as1δ/δsph=ω03/ωsph3, with the increase in ω0/ωsph for a toroidal bubble as a function of its aspect ratio shown in Fig. 2.

This work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship provided by Applied Research Laboratories at The University of Texas at Austin, and by the Office of Naval Research. The authors are grateful to Mark S. Wochner for providing preliminary numerical results for the resonance frequency of toroidal bubbles in the absence of losses.

1.
K. S.
Spratt
,
M. F.
Hamilton
,
K. M.
Lee
, and
P. S.
Wilson
, “
Radiation damping of, and scattering from, an arbitrarily shaped bubble
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
142
,
160
166
(
2017
).
2.
M.
Strasberg
, “
The pulsation frequency of nonspherical gas bubbles in liquid
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
25
,
536
537
(
1953
).
3.
T. G.
Leighton
,
The Acoustic Bubble
(
Academic Press
,
New York
,
1994
), Fig. 3.20.
4.
Yu. A.
Ilinskii
,
E. A.
Zabolotskaya
,
T. A.
Hay
, and
M. F.
Hamilton
, “
Models of cylindrical bubble pulsation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
1346
1357
(
2012
).
5.
Z.
Ye
, “
Low-frequency acoustic scattering by gas-filled prolate spheroids in liquids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
1945
1952
(
1997
).
6.
K. M.
Lee
,
P. S.
Wilson
, and
M. S.
Wochner
, “
Attenuation of standing waves in a large water tank using arrays of large tethered encapsulated bubbles
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
,
1700
1708
(
2014
).
7.
J. K.
Walters
and
J. F.
Davidson
, “
The initial motion of a gas bubble formed in an inviscid liquid: Part 2. The three-dimensional bubble and the toroidal bubble
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
17
,
321
336
(
1963
).
8.
T. J.
Pedley
, “
The toroidal bubble
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
32
,
97
112
(
1968
).
9.
K.
Marten
,
K.
Shariff
,
S.
Psarakos
, and
D. J.
White
, “
Ring bubbles of dolphins
,”
Sci. Am.
275
,
82
87
(
1996
).
10.
T.
Bonometti
and
J.
Magnaudet
, “
Transition from spherical cap to toroidal bubbles
,”
Phys. Fluids
18
,
052102
(
2006
).
11.
J. P.
Best
, “
The formation of toroidal bubbles upon the collapse of transient cavities
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
251
,
79
107
(
1993
).
12.
C.
Devin
, Jr.
, “
Survey of thermal, radiation, and viscous damping in pulsating air bubbles in water
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
31
,
1654
1667
(
1959
).
13.
V.
Belevitch
and
J.
Boersma
, “
Some electrical problems for a torus
,”
Philips J. Res.
38
,
79
137
(
1983
).
14.
T. S. E.
Thomas
, “
The capacitance of an anchor ring
,”
Australian J. Phys.
7
,
347
350
(
1954
).
15.
A. I.
Eller
, “
Damping constants of pulsating bubbles
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
47
,
1469
1470
(
1970
).