The incorporation of propagation modeling into array signal processing, usually referred to as matched‐field processing, has been shown to provide accurate source localization information in many situations. It is well known though that the performance of these methods is quite sensitive to uncertainty about knowledge of the environmental parameters. In this paper, broadband matched‐field processing methods that are tolerant of the uncertainty about environmental knowledge are investigated. A ‘‘robust’’ matched‐field matched‐filter processor based on minimax robust filtering methods is developed. The performance of the robust processor, in the presence of uncertain environmental knowledge, is compared with conventional methods. In the context of a shallow‐water example, with uncertain knowledge about the sound‐speed profile, the minimax robust processor is shown to provide a considerable improvement in performance with respect to conventional nonrobust methods (i.e., reduced error in source location estimate and increased source peak‐to‐sidelobe ratio).
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 1992
October 01 1992
Robust matched‐field matched filters
Donald F. Gingras;
Donald F. Gingras
SACLANT Undersea Ctr., 19138 San Bartolomeo, La Spezia, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Neil L. Gerr
Neil L. Gerr
Office of Naval Res., Arlington, VA 22217
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 2445–2446 (1992)
Citation
Donald F. Gingras, Neil L. Gerr; Robust matched‐field matched filters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 1992; 92 (4_Supplement): 2445–2446. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.404560
Download citation file:
96
Views
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Comparison of propagation models for source localization in a sloping shallow‐water environment
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)
A unified approach to acoustical reflection imaging
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)
Adaptive matched‐field processing for noise or clutter rejection in the presence of mismatch
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)
Selective implementation of the sector‐focusing matched‐field processor for improved robustness in a mismatched shallow‐water environment
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)
Matched‐field processing in a randomly time‐variant propagation environment
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)