The habitually confused voice quality terms, nasality and twang, were clarified in two experiments examining physiologic, acoustic, and perceptual distinctions between voice quality combinations of nasality in modal speech and twang. In experiment 1, physiologic and acoustic differences between oral speech, nasal speech, oral twang, and nasal twang were investigated. The results showed that instrumentally validated productions of each voice quality originated at the velopharyngeal port, whereas twang originated at the aryepiglottic sphincter. These physiologic manipulations generated characteristic acoustic differences in format frequency and amplitude shifts. The most significant shifts occurred for frequency at F1 and for amplitude below 1000 Hz (p<0.05). In experiment 2, perceptual distinctions among the voice qualities were identified by naive listeners, music majors, and speech pathology majors. Results of this experiment showed that the listeners perceived four distinct voice qualities by identifying them significantly above the level of chance (p<0.05).
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 1992
October 01 1992
Nasality in modal speech and twang qualities: Physiologic, acoustic, and perceptual differences
Kimberly M. Steinhauer;
Kimberly M. Steinhauer
Dept. of Speech Commun., Penn State Univ., 234 Sparks Bldg., University Park, PA 16802
Search for other works by this author on:
Deborah M. Rekart;
Deborah M. Rekart
Dept. of Speech Commun., Penn State Univ., 234 Sparks Bldg., University Park, PA 16802
Search for other works by this author on:
James Keaten
James Keaten
Dept. of Speech Commun., Penn State Univ., 234 Sparks Bldg., University Park, PA 16802
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 2340 (1992)
Citation
Kimberly M. Steinhauer, Deborah M. Rekart, James Keaten; Nasality in modal speech and twang qualities: Physiologic, acoustic, and perceptual differences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 1992; 92 (4_Supplement): 2340. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.404960
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification
Michael A. Ainslie, Robert M. Laws, et al.
Related Content
An experimental analysis of spirantization in Spanish
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)
Visual influence on heard speech syllables with a reduced visual image
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)
Syllabic perception: Effects of absolute and relative temporal cues
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)
The importance of phase in the perception of intervocalic stop consonants
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)
Comparison of human and monkey sensitivity to the English liquid /ra–la/ contrast
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1992)