Ultrasonic flea collars from two companies were evaluated for their ability to reduce flea numbers on cats with experimentally induced flea infestations. Sounds produced by the collars were also evaluated both before and after use to ensure that the flea collars were functional. Each brand of ultrasonic flea collar was evaluated on five cats with each cat being infested with 50 cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) for a 7‐day treatment and control period. Cats were declawed and fitted with Elizabethan collars to reduce normal grooming activity. Collars generated 40‐kHz pulses (0.8‐ms exponential rise and fall) every 50 or 20 ms (depending on the device). The level of the stimuli was between 92 and 80 dB SPL at 10 cm and would thus be audible to both cats and dogs. An average of 99.6% and 97.4% of the fleas were still on the cats after treatment and control periods, respectively. The ultrasonic flea collars were totally ineffective at reducing flea numbers on these cats.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 1989
August 13 2005
Ineffectiveness of ultrasonic flea collars
Michael W. Dryden;
Michael W. Dryden
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Department of Audiology and Speech Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Search for other works by this author on:
Glenis R. Long;
Glenis R. Long
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Department of Audiology and Speech Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Search for other works by this author on:
Sayed M. Gaafar
Sayed M. Gaafar
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Department of Audiology and Speech Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, S72 (1989)
Citation
Michael W. Dryden, Glenis R. Long, Sayed M. Gaafar; Ineffectiveness of ultrasonic flea collars. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 1989; 86 (S1): S72. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2027626
Download citation file:
101
Views
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
In a presentation, Ted once said I'd like my epitaph to be “I simplified.”
Paul Schomer, Truls Gjestland
Related Content
Kurtosis measurements: Implications for noise exposure criteria
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Effects of sodium salicylate and intense noise on thresholds in the chinchilla
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
The threshold recovery pattern between 48 h to 30 days after exposure to 50‐μs arc‐discharge impulse noise in guinea pigs
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Improved spatial resolution of fish using hydroacoustics
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Verbal Transformation Illusion: Satiation or Synthesis?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 1969)