Earlier measurements of the effect of pressure on sound absorption by magnesium sulfate in seawater by Hsu at 0 °C in the laboratory were limited to pressures of just over 300 bars. The pressure was limited by the strength of the 100‐liter titanium sphere, a spare ballast tank from the Woods Hole submarine ALVIN. To obtain data at higher pressures at 0 °C, measurements were recently made in 0.5 M magnesium sulfate solutions in a cylindrical reesonator. Because the magnesium sulfate relaxation frequency is independent of pressure, measurements are necessary at only one frequency. This was done in the 100‐kHz region and a sodium sulfate solution was used to correct for wall losses in the cylinder. Mode interference problems as well as a shutdown in the building air circulation system, which gave rise to temperature control problems, degraded the data. Nevertheless, enough data were obtained at higher pressures (600 to 1300 bars) to be useful in assessing the effect of pressure on seawater sound absorption at 0 °C as has been done with earlier work by Fisher at 25 °C on 0.5 molar magnesium sulfate solutions. These results will be incorporated with those of Hsu at lower pressures into an equation for absorption in seawater at 0 °C covering the whole pressure range. Predictions using this equation will be compared with those from the Garrlson‐Francois and Fisher‐Simmons equations for sound absorption in seawater. [This work was supported by Office of Naval Research.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 1989
August 13 2005
Effect of pressure on sound absorption in seawater at 0°C
F. H. Fisher;
F. H. Fisher
University of California, San Diego, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego, CA 92152
Search for other works by this author on:
W. M. Wright
W. M. Wright
Department of Physics, Kalamazoo College, Kalamazoo, MI 49007
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, S118 (1989)
Citation
F. H. Fisher, W. M. Wright; Effect of pressure on sound absorption in seawater at 0°C. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 1989; 86 (S1): S118. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2027330
Download citation file:
26
Views
Citing articles via
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Related Content
Geoacoustic models for bottom loss predictions
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Impact of sample window choice and location on time delay estimation of transients
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Higher‐order correlations and spectra and the detection of narrow‐band deterministic transients
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Farfield projection from sparse nearfield measurement samples
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Sound absorption in seawater at pressures up to 307 atmospheres
J Acoust Soc Am (May 1981)