Amplitude envelopes derived from filtered bands of speech provide varying degrees of benefit to speechreading. Three parameters related to envelope extraction are examined using both easy and difficult sentence materials: (1) the bandwidth and center frequency of the filtered speech signal used to obtain the envelope, (2) the bandwidth of the envelope signal, and (3) the carrier signal used to convey the envelope. Thus far, results for normal hearing subjects presented with difficult speech materials suggest that: (1) the envelope of wideband speech did not always provide the greatest benefit to speechreading when compared to envelopes derived from octave bands of speech; (2) as the bandwidth of the envelope signal increased from 100–4000 Hz, auditory‐visual (AV) performance improved slightly, whereas bandwidths below 100 Hz resulted in AV scores that were equal to or worse than speechreading alone; and (3) low‐frequency carrier signals were better than high‐frequency or wideband carrier signals, at least for envelopes derived from an octave band of speech centered at 500 Hz. Similar tests with easy speech materials are in progress. [Work supported by NIH.]
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
November 1988
August 13 2005
Amplitude envelopes and speechreading Free
Ken W. Grant;
Ken W. Grant
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Rebecca J. Renn;
Rebecca J. Renn
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Jenny S. Yu
Jenny S. Yu
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Ken W. Grant
Rebecca J. Renn
Jenny S. Yu
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, S45 (1988)
Citation
Ken W. Grant, Rebecca J. Renn, Jenny S. Yu; Amplitude envelopes and speechreading. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 1988; 84 (S1): S45. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2026321
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Predicting aided speechreading performance in segment identification tasks
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Comparison of three sentence‐level tests for evaluating audiovisual performance of subjects using a cochlear implant
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Speech enhancement for the hearing impaired by envelope filtering on a loudness scale
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Quasiarticulatory tactile syllables in a long‐term training experiment
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)