Hit and false alarm rates were estimated for detection of a 500‐Hz tone target in each often samples of 1/3‐oct noise centered at 500 Hz for both NoSπ and NoSo conditions. The effects of target phase (0° and 90°) on hit rate were investigated for three subjects. Results for this narrow‐band case were similar to previously reported results for wideband maskers [Gilkey et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1207–1219 (1985)]. Two differences were noted. First, for NoSπ conditions, the effect of signal phase was not significant for the narrow‐band maskers, whereas a small effect was reported for wideband maskers. Second, no significant correlation was observed between NoSo and NoSπ results across masker waveforms for hit and false alarm rates, whereas significant correlations for both rates were reported for the wideband experiment. The lack of effect of target phase on hit rate in the narrow‐band NoSπ condition is inconsistent with models based on lateral position but consistent with the EC model and with models using the sum of the squares of interaural time and intensity differences. [Work supported by NIH.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 1987
August 13 2005
Effects of target phase in narrow‐band frozen noise detection data
S. K. Isabelle;
S. K. Isabelle
Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, 110 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
H. S. Colburn
H. S. Colburn
Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, 110 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, S109 (1987)
Citation
S. K. Isabelle, H. S. Colburn; Effects of target phase in narrow‐band frozen noise detection data. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 1987; 82 (S1): S109. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2024569
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Interaural envelope correlation and the high‐frequency MLD
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Effects of roving level on binaural detection and discrimination on and off midline
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Binaural detection with reproducible short‐duration narrow‐band maskers
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Psychophysical factors of spatial impression
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
The enhancement of binaural source location by scuba divers
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)