The auditory system of the sunfish is characteristic of many teleosts, and is unspecialized for sound pressure reception. It is likely that its otolithic ear responds primarily to acoustic particle motion in the manner of an accelerometer. Single units of the lagenar and saccular eighth nerve branches were characterized in response to whole‐body acceleration. Using a three‐dimensional vibration system [Fay et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 74, S7 (1983)], the directionality of single units were measured in three orthogonal planes, and the cell's best sensitivity axis determined in spherical coordinates. Acceleration tuning curves obtained along a nearly optimal axis were essentially low pass with cutoff frequencies ranging from below 100 to 250 Hz. Best sensitivity varied from −30 to −90 dB re: 1 g (rms). Lagenar units showed a wide range of “best directions,” all roughly in a para‐saggital plane. Saccular units fell into two or more directional groups. Directional patterns for both organs reflect aspects of the organs' orientation in the head, and the orientations of hair cells on the maculae. All cells reponded as if their input (most likely a group of hair cells) were equivalent to a single hair cell of a given three‐dimensional orientation.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
May 1984
August 12 2005
Acoustic coding by the ear of the sunfish (Lepromis gibbosis): Sensitivity, tuning, and directionality of 8th nerve units Free
Sheryl Coombs;
Sheryl Coombs
Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60626
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard R. Ray
Richard R. Ray
Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60626
Search for other works by this author on:
Sheryl Coombs
Richard R. Ray
Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60626
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, S89 (1984)
Citation
Sheryl Coombs, Richard R. Ray; Acoustic coding by the ear of the sunfish (Lepromis gibbosis): Sensitivity, tuning, and directionality of 8th nerve units. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 1984; 75 (S1): S89. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2021667
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Drawer-like tunable ventilated sound barrier
Yong Ge, Yi-jun Guan, et al.
Related Content
Effects of high‐intensity sonar on fish
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2006)
Effects of varying levels of noise and vibration on behavioral and physiological stress responses in two species of freshwater aquarium fish: Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus).
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2008)
Effects of skin temperature and body site on psychophysical characteristics of cutaneous mechanoreceptor subsystems
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Physiological noise and the determination of vibro‐tactile perception thresholds
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Evaluation of impulsive wave transmission through total knee joint prothesis
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)