Chinchillas were exposed to 700–2800‐Hz noise at 105 dB SPL. Group A was exposed for 10 min on 22 occasions half a week (3 or 4 days) apart. Group B was exposed on a “factory” schedule: 22 10‐min exposures given on Monday through Friday for a month. Group C received a 220‐min exposure on a single day. Median TTS's 60 min after exposure, at 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz, were 10, 12, and 66 dB, respectively. The median number of missing outer hair cells (MOHC) was 59, 99, and 54, respectively; two control animals had 51 mud 60 MOHC. There was no relation between individual differences in TTS and in cochlear damage. Apparently chinchillas can experience a single very severe TTS (more than 60 dB an hour after exposure) with no measurable haircell damage, but a moderately severe exposure, repeated daily without time for complete recovery between exposures, can produce measurable damage. The relative susceptibility of chinchilla and man will be discussed. [Research supported by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, Public Health Service.]
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
December 1977
August 11 2005
Effects of exposure‐pattern differences on TTS and hair‐cell destruction in the chinchilla
W. Dixon Ward;
W. Dixon Ward
Hearing Research Laboratory, University of Minnesota, 2630 University Ave. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher W. Turner
Christopher W. Turner
Hearing Research Laboratory, University of Minnesota, 2630 University Ave. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414
Search for other works by this author on:
W. Dixon Ward
Christopher W. Turner
Hearing Research Laboratory, University of Minnesota, 2630 University Ave. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62, S34–S35 (1977)
Citation
W. Dixon Ward, Christopher W. Turner; Effects of exposure‐pattern differences on TTS and hair‐cell destruction in the chinchilla. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 December 1977; 62 (S1): S34–S35. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2016145
Download citation file:
86
Views
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Related Content
Intermittence and the total‐energy hypothesis
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Audiometric and histologic comparison of noise‐ and drug‐induced cochlear pathology in the chinchilla
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Electrophysiological and morphological observations of electrolytically lesioned chinchilla cochleas
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Importance of the waveform of the impulse in formulating an Impulse Noise Damage Risk Criteria
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
SEM assessment of acoustically damaged cochleas
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)