Six S's were tested with three procedures. In all of the studies the adapting stimulus was a 1‐kHz tone delivered to the S's right ear. The comparison stimuli used during the various studies were, with respect to the adapting stimuli, either homophonic (same frequency, in phase), π (same frequency, 180° out of phase), or heterophonic (different frequency, 1.2 kHz). The results may be summarized as follows: (1) Auditory adaptation as measured with a homophonic simultaneous dichotic loudness‐balance (SDLB) procedure increased as a function of the adapting ear exposure duration. (2) With heterophonic and homophonic methods of delayed balance procedures, the loudness of the adapting stimulus did not decrease as a function of AE exposure. (3) The balance levels obtained during the homophonic and heterophonic modified SDLB studies remained at a constant level irrespective of AE exposure duration. (4) When the CE stimuli were of a type that minimized lateralization cues (heterophonic and π) the unadapted loudness balances were made at a lower intensity level during SDLB's than when the homophonic CE stimulus was used. The major conclusion of the present study was that the loudness of a moderate acoustic signal does not decrease as a function of the duration of the presentation.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
July 1969
July 01 1969
Reconsideration of Loudness Adaptation Free
J. Petty;
J. Petty
Auditory Research Laboratory, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Elliott;
D. Elliott
Auditory Research Laboratory, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
Search for other works by this author on:
W. Fraser
W. Fraser
Auditory Research Laboratory, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Petty
D. Elliott
W. Fraser
Auditory Research Laboratory, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 87 (1969)
Citation
J. Petty, D. Elliott, W. Fraser; Reconsideration of Loudness Adaptation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 July 1969; 46 (1A_Supplement): 87. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1973622
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Drawer-like tunable ventilated sound barrier
Yong Ge, Yi-jun Guan, et al.
Related Content
Binaural Loudness Summation for Tones and Noise
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1969)
Loudness Discrimination as a Function of Attenuation Rate and Duration
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1969)
Effects of Direction of Frequency Sweep on Békésy Audiometry
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1969)
Absolute Thresholds for Continuous and Interrupted Pure Tones
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1969)
An electroencephalographic evoked response correlate of auditory adaptation
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)