The definition of noise as “unwanted sound” is purposely devoid of technical language owing to the wide spectrum of possible effects upon humans that are both physiological and psychological. The former is largely objective and the latter subjective. While there are a considerable number of published efforts to establish criteria on hearing‐damage risk, such “numbers” are widely debated upon the basis of lack of valid supporting data. In the area of annoyance, efforts to establish criteria are on even more untenable grounds. Attempts to equate degrees of annoyance are most difficult and highly complex. An effort to attach numbers to annoyance is faced not only with emotional and sociological factors but also with the fact that there are wide differences in human susceptibility and adaptability to noise. This paper discusses the major efforts that have been made to evaluate annoyance from industrial noise, zoning laws with performance standards, the rôle of transportation noise in such standards, and the views of the author on the usefulness of such data.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 1967
November 01 1967
Industry Noise
Kenneth M. Morse
Kenneth M. Morse
Director of Industrial Hygiene, United States Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42, 1176–1177 (1967)
Citation
Kenneth M. Morse; Industry Noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 1967; 42 (5_Supplement): 1176–1177. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2144033
Download citation file:
88
Views
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Air Conditioner Equipment
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 1967)
Criteria for Control of Community Noise: a Candid Appraisal of Some Unresolved Questions as seen by One Acoustical Consultant
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 1967)
The Noise Receiver, the Citizen
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 1967)