This is an extension of a study of the effect of the interaural correlation for a masking noise upon the masked threshold for a 500‐cps tone as reported in 1961 by Robinson and Jeffress. At that time, comparisons were made between thresholds obtained under both homophasic and antiphasic conditions. However, the variability associated with the threshold measurements (obtained by the constant method) was such as to obscure possible differences between the two antiphasic conditions or between the two homophasic. The present study employs a method derived from the theory of signal detection to obtain a more stable measure of the effects of interaural‐noise correlation. Performance was measured in a two‐interval forced‐choice experiment. The signal levels required for a predetermined value of d′ were obtained for the various conditions from functions relating d′ toE/No. Such signal levels, when plotted as masking level differences (MLD's) relative to the homophasic condition at the 1.0 value of the noise correlation, permit comparisons with similar data obtained by a threshold procedure. The results show, as did the results of the earlier study, a very rapid increase in masking as the correlation is reduced from unity for the antiphasic conditions and a gradual decrease in masking for the homophasic conditions with the same shift in correlation. In addition, the functions relating d′ to E/No show large differences in slope between the antiphasic and homophasic conditions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 1962
May 01 1962
Effect of Noise Correlation on Binaural‐Signal Detection Free
Donald E. Robinson;
Donald E. Robinson
Defense Research Laboratory, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Lloyd A. Jeffress
Lloyd A. Jeffress
Defense Research Laboratory, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Donald E. Robinson
Defense Research Laboratory, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas
Lloyd A. Jeffress
Defense Research Laboratory, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 727–728 (1962)
Citation
Donald E. Robinson, Lloyd A. Jeffress; Effect of Noise Correlation on Binaural‐Signal Detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 1962; 34 (5_Supplement): 727–728. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1937229
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Backward and Forward Masking of Probe Tones of Different Frequencies
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1962)
Optimization of a Crosscorrelator for the Case of a Linear Delay
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1962)
Binaural‐Click Lateralizations with a Three‐Click Paradigm
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1962)
Detectability of Pure Transmission Delay in Telephonic Conversation
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1962)
Combating Echo in Speech Circuits with Long Delay
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1962)