A free-field sound source can be accurately rendered over headphones via direct convolution with head-related impulse responses (HRIRs). Using binaural panning techniques, a free-field source can be approximated, which can be thought of as HRIR reconstruction. However, a loss of fidelity occurs related to the panning algorithm’s spatial resolution. Previously, perceptual comparisons of noise bursts were made between panned sources and direct convolution with measured HRIRs. Reconstructions were generated using five different binaural panning methods, both with and without time-alignment of the HRIRs with separate application of the interaural time delay (ITD). To further explore the listening test results, the quantitative differences between the reconstructed and original HRIRs were investigated alongside the perceptual data. Several perceptually-motivated error metrics were evaluated, including errors in both ITD and interaural level difference. The fidelity of the reconstructed HRTF magnitude response was evaluated using metrics that leveraged auditory modeling steps. Both subjective and objective results support that HRIR time-alignment reduces the number of filters needed for high perceptual accuracy. A principal component-base rendering filter set produced the best subjective accuracy with only a small number of required filters (16-25). The ability to predict perceptually detectable degradation via quantitative errors will be discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2024
March 01 2024
Comparing subjective similarity ratings and quantitative errors for the evaluation of free-field binaural panning techniques
Zane T. Rusk;
Zane T. Rusk
The Penn State Univ., 104 Eng. Unit A, University Park, PA 16802, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Matthew Neal;
Matthew Neal
Otolaryngol. and Comm. Disord., Univ. of Louisville and Heuser Hearing Inst., Louisville, KY
Search for other works by this author on:
Michelle C. Vigeant
Michelle C. Vigeant
The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 155, A215 (2024)
Citation
Zane T. Rusk, Matthew Neal, Michelle C. Vigeant; Comparing subjective similarity ratings and quantitative errors for the evaluation of free-field binaural panning techniques. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 2024; 155 (3_Supplement): A215. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0027351
Download citation file:
114
Views
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Does sound symbolism need sound?: The role of articulatory movement in detecting iconicity between sound and meaning
Mutsumi Imai, Sotaro Kita, et al.
Related Content
Free-field perceptual evaluation of virtual acoustic rendering algorithms using two head-related impulse response delay treatment strategies
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2023)
Investigating the perceptual accuracy of machine-learning generated personalized head-eelated impulse responses
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Personalizing head-related transfer functions using anthropometric measurements by combining two machine-learning models
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2019)
Improved accuracy and computational efficiency in virtual acoustic rendering using principal components-based amplitude panning
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2021)
Comparing the differences in robustness between interaural time delay calculation methods
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2021)