One of the earliest applications of analog music synthesizers was the simulation of orchestral instruments. Electronic wind instrument sounds were played through piano-like keyboards or interfaces with breath controllers that mimicked physical wind instruments. Synthesizers are also often the best alternative for artists with disabilities to play a musical instrument. This talk focuses on methods and experiences the authors were involved with to design electronic alternatives to wind instruments for people who lost control of their arms. The Jamboxx is a USB controller that was specifically designed as a head-only interface using a breath controller to simulate airflow but also operates as a suck/puff device to activate menus and buttons, a slider to manipulate pitch, and a tilt-sensor to control expression parameters. The Jamboxx also addressed musicians seeking a harmonica-type interface to augment their guitar performance. The AUMI instrument is a touchless device based on camera tracking. This talk will address different sound synthesis methods to achieve realistic wind instruments, the ability to integrate these instruments with other off-the-shelf products (e.g., VST plugins), and special requirements for artists with special needs to play these instruments without too much fatigue. [Work supported by the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2024
March 01 2024
Electronic wind instruments for mobility-restricted musicians
David S. Whalen;
David S. Whalen
EMPAC, Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., Troy, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Henry Lowengard;
Henry Lowengard
AUMI Consortium, Kingston, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonas Braasch
Jonas Braasch
School of Architecture, Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., 110 8th St., Troy, NY 12180, braasj@rpi.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 155, A149 (2024)
Citation
David S. Whalen, Henry Lowengard, Jonas Braasch; Electronic wind instruments for mobility-restricted musicians. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 2024; 155 (3_Supplement): A149. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0027121
Download citation file:
66
Views
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Measuring harmonic benefit in musicians and non-musicians in several tasks
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2022)
Benefit of tonal context on relative pitch perception in musicians and non-musicians
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Patterns procedural learning for pitch matching in adult musicians and non-musicians
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2017)
Differences in speech-on-speech processing between musicians and non-musicians: The role of durational cues
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Comparison of two types of earplugs by musicians
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)