Bimodal hearing, which combines a cochlear implant (CI) with a contralateral hearing aid, provides significant speech recognition benefits in quiet and noise. These benefits have also been observed in normal-hearing listeners using vocoder-based CI simulation combined with low-pass filtered speech, even with acoustic bandwidths as narrow as 125–250 Hz. However, it is challenging to measure the optimal acoustic amplification with difficult-to-test populations, such as young children and adults with disabilities. The frequency following response (FFR) offers a potential solution to this problem, as it objectively quantifies subcortical phase-locking to speech features. Recently, FFR fundamental frequency amplitude in the non-implanted ear was found to be well-correlated with bimodal benefit in CI patients. The present study aimed to parametrically examine acoustic bandwidth effects (125, 250, 500, and 750 Hz) on speech evoked FFRs using simulated bimodal stimuli. We hypothesized that FFRenv amplitudes would increase as bandwidth increases up to 750 Hz and the minimal acoustic bandwidth needed to derive FFR bimodal benefit is less than 250 Hz.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2021
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2021
Acoustic bandwidth effects on envelope following responses to simulated bimodal hearing
Can Xu;
Can Xu
Speech, Lang., and Hearing Sci., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Speech, Lang., and Hearing Sci., 2504A Whitis Ave. (A1100), Austin, TX 78712-0114, canxu@utexas.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Spencer Smith
Spencer Smith
Speech, Lang., and Hearing Sci., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 150, A64 (2021)
Connected Content
A companion article has been published:
Frequency following responses to simulated bimodal speech: Acoustic bandwidth effects
Citation
Can Xu, Fan-Yin Cheng, Sarah Medina, Spencer Smith; Acoustic bandwidth effects on envelope following responses to simulated bimodal hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2021; 150 (4_Supplement): A64. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0007634
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification
Michael A. Ainslie, Robert M. Laws, et al.
Related Content
Objective discrimination of bimodal speech using the frequency following response: A machine learning approach
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2022)
Relative contribution of envelope and fine structure to the subcortical encoding of noise-degraded speech
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2016)
The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2012)
Musical emotion perception in bimodal patients: Relationship between bimodal benefit and neural representation of temporal fine structure using Rhodes piano stimuli
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2019)
The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2016)