Phonetic variation poses a challenge for language learners tasked with identifying the abstract sound categories (phonemes) of their target language(s). However, relatively little is known about the full extent of phonetic variability in naturalistic infant-directed speech (IDS), and how much of this variation can be explained by positional allophony. We phonetically annotated ∼31 000 tokens of coronal segments (/t/, /d/, /s/, /z/, and /n/) in naturalistic English IDS from the Providence Corpus (Demuth et al., 2006) in order to quantify the degree of phonetic variation present in the everyday speech directed to infants. We found that canonical variants are the most frequent variants for /d/, /s/, /z/, and /n/, but not for /t/. Additionally, every segment had more canonical instances in word-initial compared to word-final position. We are currently comparing the distribution of phonetic variants in specific phonological environments (e.g., tapping environments) in IDS with naturalistic adult-directed speech. We discuss the implications of these results for infants’ ability to identify the canonical (phonemic) variant from a set of phones, and uncover when and where positionally governed phonetic variants must surface.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2021
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2021
Quantifying phonetic variation: A large-scale corpus analysis of coronal segments in English infant-directed speech
Ekaterina A. Khlystova;
Ekaterina A. Khlystova
Linguist., UCLA, 3125 Campbell Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, ekhlystova@ucla.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Adam J. Chong;
Adam J. Chong
Queen Mary Univ. of London, London, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Megha Sundara
Megha Sundara
Linguist., UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 150, A150–A151 (2021)
Citation
Ekaterina A. Khlystova, Adam J. Chong, Megha Sundara; Quantifying phonetic variation: A large-scale corpus analysis of coronal segments in English infant-directed speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2021; 150 (4_Supplement): A150–A151. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0007947
Download citation file:
67
Views
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Evaluating the learnability of vowel categories from infant-directed speech
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2022)
A multimodal corpus of speech to infant and adult listeners
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2013)
The lexical representation of coda /t/ by 14-month-olds
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2023)
CRSS-LDNN: Long-duration naturalistic noise corpus containing multi-layer noise recordings for robust speech processing
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2018)
Speech rate and pitch characteristics of infant-directed speech: Longitudinal and cross-linguistic observations
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2016)