This study investigates whether listeners’ use of prosodic cues to lexical contrasts can transfer from the processing of one phonological phenomenon in the native (i.e., first) language (L1) to the processing of another phonological phenomenon in a second language (L2). It does so by investigating how Gyeongsang Korean (GK) and Seoul Korean (SK) listeners process English lexical stress contrasts. While GK has lexical pitch accents, SK does not. Korean L2 learners of English completed a sequence-recall task in which they were asked to recall four-item sequences of English words that differed suprasegmentally (stress contrast) or segmentally (phonemic contrast). The results show that there is a significant interaction between L1 and contrast type for GK listeners, but not for SK listeners. The simple effects of L1 confirm that SK listeners showed lower accuracy than GK listeners in the stress contrast condition. GK listeners’ advantage over SK listeners in the stress contrast condition suggests that L2 learners can transfer the use of prosodic cues from one phonological phenomenon in the L1 (lexical pitch accents) to another phonological phenomenon in the L2 (lexical stress), providing robust evidence for the phonetic approach (e.g., Cue-Weighting Transfer Hypothesis) to the perception of lexical stress contrasts.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2020
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2020
Testing the Cue-Weighting Transfer Hypothesis with Korean listeners’ perception of English lexical stress
Hyoju Kim;
Hyoju Kim
Linguist, Univ. of Kansas, 1541 Lilac Ln., Blake Hall, Rm. 427, Lawrence, KS 66045-3129, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Annie Tremblay
Annie Tremblay
Linguist, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148, 2812 (2020)
Citation
Hyoju Kim, Annie Tremblay; Testing the Cue-Weighting Transfer Hypothesis with Korean listeners’ perception of English lexical stress. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2020; 148 (4_Supplement): 2812. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5147839
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Does sound symbolism need sound?: The role of articulatory movement in detecting iconicity between sound and meaning
Mutsumi Imai, Sotaro Kita, et al.
Related Content
The influence of inter-dialect contact on the Korean three-way laryngeal distinction: An acoustic comparison among Seoul, Gyeongsang, and bidialectal speakers
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
A preliminary investigation of the effect of dialect on the perception of Korean sibilant fricatives
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2014)
Perceptual training enhances Seoul Korean listeners’ use of vowel quality and pitch cues to English lexical stress
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2022)
Limits of short-term perceptual training for enhancing Seoul-Korean listeners’ use of English lexical stress in spoken word recognition
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2024)
Effect of native Korean dialects on Chinese learners' perception of lexical tones
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2018)