Recent studies on retuning of phonetic categories by lexically guided perceptual learning suggest an inverse relationship between inherent acoustic variability and malleability of phonetic categories—the greater the variability, the smaller the retuning effect. However, it remains to be investigated what perceptual processing mechanisms are responsible for the observed relationship. Extending our previous study (Kataoka and Koo, 2017) that compared the degree of malleability between [u] (more variable) and [i] (less variable), we not only compared the size of retuning effect between the two vowels but also examined how listeners judge category goodness of synthesized stimuli from a [i]-[u] continuum. Our subjects (1) showed signs of category retuning for [i] but not for [u] and (2) judged goodness of stimuli in a more gradient manner and took longer to do so when asked to judge with reference to [u] than [i]. The results suggest that the two vowels differ in terms of their acoustic variability as well as their internal structure and that relative difficulty in resolving input speech signal in reference to a category such as [u] might be one reason the category is less malleable than a less variable category such as [i].
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2019
Effects of variability and internal structure on malleability of phonetic categories: A case of [i] versus [u]
Reiko Kataoka;
Reiko Kataoka
Linguist and Lang. Development, San José State Univ., One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0093, reiko.kataoka@sjsu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Hahn Koo
Hahn Koo
Linguist and Lang. Development, San José State Univ., San Jose, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 3053 (2019)
Citation
Reiko Kataoka, Hahn Koo; Effects of variability and internal structure on malleability of phonetic categories: A case of [i] versus [u]. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2019; 146 (4_Supplement): 3053. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137584
Download citation file:
6
Views
Citing articles via
Related Content
Comparing malleability of phonetic category between [i] and [u]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2017)
Is perceptual learning influenced by inherent variability of phonetic category?
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2016)
Lexically guided retuning of visual phonetic categories
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2013)
The role of distributional information in cross-talker generalization of phonetic category retuning
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2018)
Size-dependent “malleable-to-brittle” transition in a bulk metallic glass
Appl. Phys. Lett. (August 2008)