Loud moving interferers challenge adaptive beamformers (ABFs) attempting attenuate these interferers while detecting quiet sources. Specifically, moving interferers create a dynamic tension in choosing the best window length for estimating the sample covariance matrix (SCM) from received snapshots. If the window is too short, the ABF does not accurately steer its nulls toward the interferers, diminishing its effectiveness in attenuating the interferers. If the window is too long, the interferers transit multiple beamwidths, splitting their power across multiple eigenvectors, also diminishing the ABF's effectiveness (Baggeroer and Cox, 1999). Previously proposed approaches to address this challenge include Multirate Adaptive Beamforming (Cox, 2000) and Null-Broadening (Song et al., 2003). This talk proposes a universal adaptive beamformer (UABF) exploiting online learning techniques to adapt the length of the SCM averaging window. The UABF's array weights blend the array weights of several competing ABFs. The recent performance of each fixed-window ABF determines its contribution to the UABF array weights. The UABF's performance provably converges to rival the best fixed-length window ABF for every finite power input sequence, without assuming a specific probability distribution. In nonstationary environments where interferers change speed, the UABF may outperform all of the competing fixed-window ABFs. [Supported by ONR 321US.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2019
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2019
Universal adaptive beamforming for moving interferers Free
John R. Buck
John R. Buck
ECE, UMass Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Rd., North Dartmouth, MA 02747, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
John R. Buck
ECE, UMass Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Rd., North Dartmouth, MA 02747, [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 3017 (2019)
Citation
John R. Buck; Universal adaptive beamforming for moving interferers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2019; 146 (4_Supplement): 3017. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137457
Download citation file:
134
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Designing a covariance matrix tapered beamformer that is universal over notch width
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2021)
Interpreting the environmental information embodied in universal adaptive beamformers
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Deconvolved conventional beamforming applied to the SWellEx96 data
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2018)
Coherent averaging of the passive fathometer response using short correlation time
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2011)
Cluster analysis and robust use of full-field models for sonar beamforming
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2006)