Accurate oral reading rate is a common measure of early reading proficiency (grades K-4). A concurrent validation study compared a fully automated measure of accurate reading rate (words read correctly per minute) to DIBELS, a well-established, human-scored assessment. We report data from 174 students at a parochial school in Delaware and 130 students at a public school in Texas. Each student took three forms of an automatically scored test (yielding 898 test forms automatically scored) and also took the grade-appropriate form of the standard DIBELS test, which was scored by a trained person. Test administration order was counterbalanced. Correlations were computed for Machine-Machine and Human-Machine score pairs, for each grade separately and for the total dataset. When all grades are combined, Pearson r = 0.87, and correlations for single grades are all above 0.85, thus at or above the reliability ceiling of the DIBELS criterion score. Also, the automated tests have higher test-retest reliability (r = 0.91) than reported in an independent DIBELS study (Goffreda and DiPerna, 2010). [This research was supported by IES, U.S. Department of Education, via contract ED-IES-17-C-0030 to Analytic Measures, Inc. Disclosure: This report of an accurate automatic method may potentially benefit the authors financially in the future.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2019
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2019
Accurate reading rate: Validations of machine scoring
Masanori Suzuki;
Masanori Suzuki
Analytic Measures, Inc., Palo Alto, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jared Bernstein;
Jared Bernstein
Analytic Measures, Inc., 1330 Tasso St., Palo Alto, CA 94301, jared413@stanford.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Tomoyo Okuda
Tomoyo Okuda
Analytic Measures, Inc., Palo Alto, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 2957 (2019)
Citation
Masanori Suzuki, Jared Bernstein, Jian Cheng, Tomoyo Okuda; Accurate reading rate: Validations of machine scoring. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2019; 146 (4_Supplement): 2957. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137273
Download citation file:
34
Views
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Perseverance measured in children’s oral reading
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2018)
Higher speech levels in K-12 classrooms correlate with lower math achievement scores
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Reading fluency in mono- and multilinguals: Is there an additive effect of the number of languages spoken?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Whole word scoring versus phoneme error scoring for audiological word recognition testing
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2019)
L1 category precision hypothesis in L2 production: Korean learners’ English front vowels
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2023)