Sediment geoacoustic properties are of considerable interest for commercial, industrial, and naval applications. In order to make geoacoustic inferences from acoustic data, the practitioner must choose a sediment acoustics model. The ‘Hamilton model’ is the most common, which assumes a frequency-independent sound speed, density, and an attenuation varying linearly with frequency, f1. Buckingham’s Viscous Grain Shearing (VGS) model offers a practical alternative with important benefits. For example, since it obeys causality, it provides fundamental bounds to the parameter space that the Hamilton model does not. Furthermore, if the acoustic data are sufficiently informative, the model provides insight into the frequency dependence of sound speed and attenuation. The central physics in VGS are expressed in high-level (material impulse response) functions, which consider both viscous and friction loss mechanisms and lead to attenuation varying between f1/2 to f1 to f2. Geoacoustic inference from seabed reflection measurements using the VGS model provides insight into the frequency dependence of naturally occurring marine sediments, i.e., admixtures of clay, silt, sand. At present, the VGS model is likely the most general (causal) sediment acoustics model, i.e., can reasonably treat the broadest range of sediment fabrics. [Research supported by the ONR Ocean Acoustics Program.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2019
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2019
Some reflections on Buckingham’s viscous grain shearing model
Charles W. Holland;
Charles W. Holland
Appl. Res. Lab., The Penn State Univ., P.O. Box 30, State College, PA 16804, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Jan Dettmer;
Jan Dettmer
Dept. of Geosci., Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Stan E. Dosso
Stan E. Dosso
School of Earth and Ocean Sci., Univ. of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 2857 (2019)
Citation
Charles W. Holland, Jan Dettmer, Stan E. Dosso; Some reflections on Buckingham’s viscous grain shearing model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2019; 146 (4_Supplement): 2857. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5136912
Download citation file:
64
Views
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Impacts of infauna, worm tubes, and shell hash on sediment acoustic variability and deviation from the viscous grain shearing model
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2022)
Variability of parameter estimates used in the Buckingham viscous grain shearing model.
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2010)
Estimating geoacoustic properties of sediments with a wide grain-size distribution using sediment organic content and the viscous grain shearing model
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2022)
A comparison of three geoacoustic models using Bayesian inversion and selection techniques applied to wave speed and attenuation measurements
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2018)
Biogeoacoustic sediment properties along a horizontal sand-mud gradient
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2021)