Recent research in dyslexia postulates that imprecise representations of phonemes are linked to basic auditory deficits in temporal sampling. Evidence comes from adult readers with dyslexia demonstrating deficits in auditory sampling at several rates of the speech signal including the phoneme rate (>40 Hz). It remains unknown whether such deficits are present in infancy, especially during the “sensitive period” for native phoneme learning (6–12 months). We examined auditory sampling in infants at risk for dyslexia across the period of native phoneme learning. Using magnetoencephalography, we recorded auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to white noise that was amplitude-modulated at frequency rates relevant to speech processing in 6- and 12-month-old at-risk and typically developing (TD) infants. Our results show that the two groups differed in hemisphere involvement of ASSRs at the phoneme rate (50–80 Hz): TD infants showed a shift from right-to-left hemisphere processing from 6 to 12 months, whereas at-risk infants showed stronger right-hemisphere processing at 12 than 6 months. This measure predicted words understood at 13 months. Risk for dyslexia is associated with auditory sampling deficits throughout the sensitive period. These deficits may affect future language acquisition.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2019
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2019
Altered auditory sampling in infants at risk for dyslexia across the sensitive period of native phoneme learning
Maria Mittag;
Maria Mittag
Inst. for Learning & Brain Sci., Univ. of Washington, Portage Bay Bldg., Rm. 356, Seattle, WA 98195-7988, mmittag@uw.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Patricia Kuhl
Patricia Kuhl
Inst. for Learning & Brain Sci., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 2832 (2019)
Citation
Maria Mittag, Eric Larson, Samu Taulu, Maggie Clarke, Patricia Kuhl; Altered auditory sampling in infants at risk for dyslexia across the sensitive period of native phoneme learning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2019; 146 (4_Supplement): 2832. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5136815
Download citation file:
57
Views
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification
Michael A. Ainslie, Robert M. Laws, et al.
Related Content
Basic auditory processing deficits in infants at risk for dyslexia during the sensitive period predict future language
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2019)
Categorical phoneme labeling in children with dyslexia does not depend on stimulus duration
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2019)
Locus of phonological deficits in adults with dyslexia
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2014)
The role of phase synchronisation between low frequency amplitude modulations in child phonology and morphology speech tasks
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2018)
Magnetoencephalography as a tool to study speech perception in awake infants
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2008)