Sensitivity to interaural phase difference (IPD) cues is critical for localizing sound and hearing in background noise. Recent work from multiple laboratories has explored electrophysiologic methods for assaying IPD sensitivity with the aim of developing an objective measure of binaural hearing. Such a measure would be useful in a variety of clinical and research applications such as understanding the effects of aging on binaural hearing; fine-tuning hearing aids/cochlear implants to maximize binaural benefit; and assessing neural damage after a traumatic brain injury. Here, we present data from an ongoing study evaluating a novel “multi-level” (brainstem, midbrain, and cortex) simultaneous measure of IPD acuity. Amplitude modulated (20, 40, and 80 AM) carrier tones (125, 250, and 500 Hz) with IPDs embedded in them (7 deg–180 deg) were used to generate auditory evoked potentials in young, normal hearing listeners. Neural responses corresponding to the carrier tones (frequency following responses), amplitude modulation envelopes (envelope following responses), and cortical change detection (acoustic change complex) were measured simultaneously to provide a multi-level snapshot of neural IPD processing. Parametric data presented here demonstrate feasibility and limitations of this approach for measuring IPD encoding at multiple levels of the auditory system.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2019
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2019
Multilevel objective measures of interaural phase difference detection
Spencer Smith;
Spencer Smith
Commun. Sci. and Disord., The Univ. of Texas at Austin, 39 Woodstone Square, Austin, TX 78703, spencer.smith@austin.utexas.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Won So
Won So
Commun. Sci. and Disord., The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 2831–2832 (2019)
Citation
Spencer Smith, Won So; Multilevel objective measures of interaural phase difference detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2019; 146 (4_Supplement): 2831–2832. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5136810
Download citation file:
78
Views
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification
Michael A. Ainslie, Robert M. Laws, et al.
Related Content
Neural binaural sensitivity at high sound speeds: Single cell responses in cat midbrain to fast-changing interaural time differences of broadband sounds
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2019)
Temporal constraints on neural and psychophysical sensitivity to interaural level difference cues to sound source location
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2018)
Electrophysiological and behavioral assessment of binaural processing: Effects of age
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2023)
Early temporary asymmetrical hearing impairs behavioral and neural sensitivity to sound location
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2018)
Effects of interaural decoherence on sensitivity to interaural level differences across frequency
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2021)